Eade John
Dept of Social Science, University of Roehampton, 80 Roehampton Lane, London, SW15 5SL, UK,
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2013 Dec;47(4):509-15. doi: 10.1007/s12124-013-9244-0.
This article provides a commentary on seven papers published in a special issue led by J. Dahinden and T. Zittoun in this journal. The papers explore social polarisation, boundary making, inter-group dialogue and migrants' movement between groups in the context of religion. The exploration is undertaken from different disciplinary backgrounds and in various countries across Europe as well as in Australia. A critical engagement is developed with some of the key issues raised by the papers. This engagement begins by drawing on critiques of 'groupism' and then proceeds to consider the role played by process, power, knowledge and governmentality in the context of both time and space. The discussion is supported by illustrations from the case studies provided by the papers. The discussion also links issues raised by the papers to developments within Britain over time and in urban space, which involve the state, Muslim community representatives and the everyday practices of Muslim citizens in London, particularly those concerned with the body.
本文对由J. 达欣登和T. 齐托恩在本期刊主导的特刊中发表的七篇论文进行了评论。这些论文探讨了宗教背景下的社会两极分化、边界划分、群体间对话以及群体间移民流动。这种探讨是从不同学科背景出发，在欧洲各国以及澳大利亚展开的。针对这些论文提出的一些关键问题进行了批判性分析。这种分析首先借鉴了对“群体主义”的批判，然后进而考虑过程、权力、知识和治理在时空背景下所起的作用。论文提供的案例研究中的例证为该讨论提供了支持。该讨论还将论文提出的问题与英国随时间推移以及城市空间中的发展联系起来，这些发展涉及国家、穆斯林社区代表以及伦敦穆斯林公民的日常实践，尤其是那些与身体相关的实践。
