• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对痴呆症患者进行姑息治疗的景观建模:一项欧洲混合方法研究。

Modelling the landscape of palliative care for people with dementia: a European mixed methods study.

机构信息

Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, England.

出版信息

BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Aug 12;12(1):30. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-30.

DOI:10.1186/1472-684X-12-30
PMID:23937891
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3751306/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palliative care for people with dementia is often sub-optimal. This is partly because of the challenging nature of dementia itself, and partly because of system failings that are particularly salient in primary care and community services. There is a need to systematize palliative care for people with dementia, to clarify where changes in practice could be made.To develop a model of palliative care for people with dementia that captures commonalities and differences across Europe, a technology development approach was adopted, using mixed methods including 1) critical synthesis of the research literature and policy documents, 2) interviews with national experts in policy, service organisation, service delivery, patient and carer interests, and research in palliative care, and 3) nominal groups of researchers tasked with synthesising data and modelling palliative care.

DISCUSSION

A generic model of palliative care, into which quality indicators can be embedded. The proposed model includes features deemed important for the systematisation of palliative care for people with dementia. These are: the division of labour amongst practitioners of different disciplines; the structure and function of care planning; the management of rising risk and increasing complexity; boundaries between disease-modifying treatment and palliative care and between palliative and end-of-life care; and the process of bereavement.

SUMMARY

The co-design approach to developing a generic model of palliative care for people with dementia has placed the person needing palliative care within a landscape of services and professional disciplines. This model will be explored further in the intervention phase of the IMPACT project.

摘要

背景

痴呆症患者的姑息治疗往往不尽如人意。这部分是因为痴呆症本身具有挑战性,部分是因为在初级保健和社区服务中特别明显的系统故障。需要将痴呆症患者的姑息治疗系统化,明确可以在哪些方面改变实践。为了制定一种适用于欧洲各地的痴呆症患者姑息治疗模式,采用了技术开发方法,结合使用混合方法,包括 1)对研究文献和政策文件进行批判性综合,2)对政策、服务组织、服务提供、患者和照顾者利益以及姑息治疗研究方面的国家专家进行访谈,以及 3)指定的研究人员名义小组负责综合数据和模拟姑息治疗。

讨论

一种姑息治疗通用模型,可以嵌入质量指标。拟议的模型包括被认为对痴呆症患者姑息治疗系统化很重要的特征。这些特征是:不同学科从业者之间的分工;护理计划的结构和功能;风险上升和复杂性增加的管理;疾病修正治疗与姑息治疗之间以及姑息治疗与临终关怀之间的界限;以及丧亲之痛的过程。

总结

为痴呆症患者制定姑息治疗通用模型的共同设计方法将需要姑息治疗的人置于服务和专业学科的背景下。该模型将在 IMPACT 项目的干预阶段进一步探讨。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d695/3751306/0a16334c1865/1472-684X-12-30-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d695/3751306/5f9861d21220/1472-684X-12-30-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d695/3751306/0a16334c1865/1472-684X-12-30-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d695/3751306/5f9861d21220/1472-684X-12-30-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d695/3751306/0a16334c1865/1472-684X-12-30-2.jpg

相似文献

1
Modelling the landscape of palliative care for people with dementia: a European mixed methods study.对痴呆症患者进行姑息治疗的景观建模:一项欧洲混合方法研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Aug 12;12(1):30. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-30.
2
3
A comparison of four dementia palliative care services using the RE-AIM framework.使用 RE-AIM 框架对四种痴呆症姑息治疗服务进行比较。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04343-w.
4
Consensus on quality indicators to assess the organisation of palliative cancer and dementia care applicable across national healthcare systems and selected by international experts.关于质量指标的共识,这些指标用于评估适用于各国医疗保健系统并由国际专家选定的姑息性癌症和痴呆症护理的组织情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 17;14:396. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-396.
5
An intervention to improve outcomes of falls in dementia: the DIFRID mixed-methods feasibility study.一项旨在改善痴呆症患者跌倒结局的干预措施:DIFRID 混合方法可行性研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Oct;23(59):1-208. doi: 10.3310/hta23590.
6
Barriers to the provision of high-quality palliative care for people with dementia in England: a qualitative study of professionals' experiences.英格兰为痴呆症患者提供高质量姑息治疗的障碍:一项关于专业人员经历的定性研究
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Jul;22(4):386-94. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12094. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
7
8
Explanation of context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care: the MH-CREST realist evidence synthesis.成人社区心理健康危机护理中的背景、机制和结果解释:MH-CREST 真实证据综合研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(15):1-161. doi: 10.3310/TWKK5110.
9
CELPI: trial protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a Carer End of Life Planning Intervention in people dying with dementia.CELPI:一项针对痴呆症临终患者的照顾者临终计划干预的随机对照试验的试验方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Nov 16;22(1):869. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03534-1.
10
Palliative and end of life care for people with dementia: lessons for clinical commissioners.痴呆症患者的姑息治疗和临终关怀:给临床专员的经验教训
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2014 Oct;15(4):406-17. doi: 10.1017/S146342361300039X. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Health System Leadership for Psychological Health and Organizational Resilience During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Multimethod Study.新冠疫情期间心理健康与组织韧性的卫生系统领导力:一项多方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 28;14:e66402. doi: 10.2196/66402.
2
Improving end-of-life care for people with dementia: a mixed-methods study.改善痴呆症患者的临终关怀:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Jan 30;23(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12904-023-01335-w.
3
Palliative Care in Nursing Home Residents with Young-Onset Dementia: Professional and Family Caregiver Perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
Palliative care services for people with dementia: a synthesis of the literature reporting the views and experiences of professionals and family carers.为痴呆症患者提供的姑息治疗服务:综合报道专业人员和家庭护理人员观点及经验的文献
Dementia (London). 2014 Jan;13(1):96-110. doi: 10.1177/1471301212450538. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
2
Evaluating educational initiatives to improve palliative care for people with dementia: a narrative review.评估改善痴呆症患者姑息治疗的教育举措:一项叙述性综述。
Dementia (London). 2014 May;13(3):366-81. doi: 10.1177/1471301212474140. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
3
Older people dying with dementia: a nationwide study.
养老院中早发性痴呆患者的姑息治疗:专业护理人员和家庭护理人员的观点。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;97(2):573-586. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230486.
4
Current State of Palliative Care in Iran and Related Issues: A Narrative Review.伊朗姑息治疗的现状及相关问题:叙述性综述
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2021 Sep 2;26(5):380-391. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_418_20. eCollection 2021 Sep-Oct.
5
How Do Persons with Young and Late Onset Dementia Die?早发性和晚发性痴呆患者的死亡方式有哪些?
J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;81(2):843-852. doi: 10.3233/JAD-210046.
6
Lay Caregivers' Experiences With Caring for Persons With Dementia: A Phenomenological Study.照顾者照顾痴呆症患者的体验:一项现象学研究。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Aug 1;46(8):17-27. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20200527-02. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
7
IssuEs in Palliative care for people in advanced and terminal stages of Young-onset and Late-Onset dementia in GErmany (EPYLOGE): the study protocol.德国早发性和晚发性痴呆晚期和终末期患者姑息治疗中的问题(EPYLOGE):研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Aug 31;18(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1846-0.
8
The facilitators and challenges of dying at home with dementia: A narrative synthesis.《有痴呆症在家中临终的促进因素和挑战:叙事综述》。
Palliat Med. 2018 Jun;32(6):1042-1054. doi: 10.1177/0269216318760442.
9
Improving palliative care in selected settings in England using quality indicators: a realist evaluation.利用质量指标改善英格兰特定环境下的姑息治疗:一项实在论评价
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Aug 2;15:69. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0144-1.
10
Strategies to implement evidence into practice to improve palliative care: recommendations of a nominal group approach with expert opinion leaders.将证据应用于实践以改善姑息治疗的策略:采用名义群体法并征求专家意见领袖的建议
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Sep 29;14:47. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0044-9.
痴呆症患者的死亡:一项全国性研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Oct;24(10):1581-91. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000865. Epub 2012 May 30.
4
When the profession becomes personal: dementia care practitioners as family caregivers.当职业变得个人化:痴呆症护理从业者作为家庭护理者。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Jun;24(6):902-10. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211002882. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
5
The need for new perspectives on evaluation of palliative care.对姑息治疗评估新视角的需求。
Palliat Med. 2011 Dec;25(8):737-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216311425641.
6
Dying well with dementia: qualitative examination of end-of-life care.《痴呆症末期的美好离世:对临终关怀的定性研究》
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;199(5):417-22. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.093989. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
7
The dementia social care workforce in England: secondary analysis of a national workforce dataset.英格兰的痴呆症社会护理人员队伍:国家人员配置数据集的二次分析。
Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(1):110-8. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2011.596808. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
8
Do nursing homes for older people have the support they need to provide end-of-life care? A mixed methods enquiry in England.老年人养老院是否有提供临终关怀所需的支持?英格兰的一项混合方法研究。
Palliat Med. 2011 Mar;25(2):125-38. doi: 10.1177/0269216310387964. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
9
Perceived barriers and facilitators for general practitioner-patient communication in palliative care: a systematic review.姑息治疗中全科医生与患者沟通的感知障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2011 Sep;25(6):613-29. doi: 10.1177/0269216310395987. Epub 2011 Jan 27.
10
The Netherlands: health system review.荷兰:卫生系统综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(1):v-xxvii, 1-228.