• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于质量指标的共识,这些指标用于评估适用于各国医疗保健系统并由国际专家选定的姑息性癌症和痴呆症护理的组织情况。

Consensus on quality indicators to assess the organisation of palliative cancer and dementia care applicable across national healthcare systems and selected by international experts.

作者信息

van Riet Paap Jasper, Vernooij-Dassen Myrra, Dröes Rose-Marie, Radbruch Lukas, Vissers Kris, Engels Yvonne

机构信息

Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ healthcare), Radboud university medical center, P,O, Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 17;14:396. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-396.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-14-396
PMID:25228087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4177156/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large numbers of vulnerable patients are in need of palliative cancer and dementia care. However, a wide gap exists between the knowledge of best practices in palliative care and their use in everyday clinical practice. As part of a European policy improvement program, quality indicators (QIs) have been developed to monitor and improve the organisation of palliative care for patients with cancer and those with dementia in various settings in different European countries.

METHOD

A multidisciplinary, international panel of professionals participated in a modified RAND Delphi procedure to compose a set of palliative care QIs based on existing sets of QIs on the organisation of palliative care. Panellists participated in three written rounds, one feedback round and one meeting. The panel's median votes were used to identify the final set of QIs.

RESULTS

The Delphi procedure resulted in 23 useful QIs. These QIs represent key elements of the organisation of good clinical practice, such as the availability of palliative care teams, the availability of special facilities to provide palliative care for patients and their relatives, and the presence of educational interventions for professionals. The final set also includes QIs that are related to the process of palliative care, such as documentation of pain and other symptoms, communication with patients in need of palliative care and their relatives, and end-of-life decisions.

CONCLUSION

International experts selected a set of 23 QIs for the organisation of palliative care. Although we particularly focused on the organisation of cancer and dementia palliative care, most QIs are generic and are applicable for other types of diseases as well.

摘要

背景

大量脆弱患者需要癌症和痴呆症的姑息治疗。然而,姑息治疗最佳实践的知识与日常临床实践中的应用之间存在很大差距。作为欧洲政策改进计划的一部分,已制定质量指标(QIs),以监测和改善欧洲不同国家各种环境下癌症患者和痴呆症患者的姑息治疗组织情况。

方法

一个多学科的国际专业小组参与了改良的兰德德尔菲程序,根据现有的姑息治疗组织质量指标集,编制了一套姑息治疗质量指标。小组成员参与了三轮书面调查、一轮反馈调查和一次会议。小组的中位数投票用于确定最终的质量指标集。

结果

德尔菲程序产生了23个有用的质量指标。这些质量指标代表了良好临床实践组织的关键要素,如姑息治疗团队的可用性、为患者及其亲属提供姑息治疗的特殊设施的可用性,以及针对专业人员的教育干预措施的存在。最终指标集还包括与姑息治疗过程相关的质量指标,如疼痛和其他症状的记录、与需要姑息治疗的患者及其亲属的沟通,以及临终决策。

结论

国际专家为姑息治疗组织选定了一套23个质量指标。尽管我们特别关注癌症和痴呆症姑息治疗的组织,但大多数质量指标是通用的,也适用于其他类型的疾病。

相似文献

1
Consensus on quality indicators to assess the organisation of palliative cancer and dementia care applicable across national healthcare systems and selected by international experts.关于质量指标的共识,这些指标用于评估适用于各国医疗保健系统并由国际专家选定的姑息性癌症和痴呆症护理的组织情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 17;14:396. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-396.
2
Development and pilot testing of quality improvement indicators for integrated primary dementia care.制定并试点评估综合性原发性痴呆护理质量改进指标。
BMJ Open Qual. 2020 Jun;9(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000916.
3
Nursing-sensitive quality indicators for quality improvement in Norwegian nursing homes - a modified Delphi study.挪威养老院护理质量改进的护理敏感质量指标 - 一项改良 Delphi 研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 6;23(1):1068. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10088-4.
4
Development and Practical Test of Quality Indicators for Palliative Care in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure.开发并实践心力衰竭慢性病患者姑息治疗质量指标
Circ J. 2020 Mar 25;84(4):584-591. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0225. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
5
Development of quality indicators for hypertension, extractable from the electronic health record of the general practitioner: a rand-modified Delphi method.高血压质量指标的开发,可从全科医生的电子健康记录中提取:一项随机修正 Delphi 法。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 15;25(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02543-w.
6
Face-validation of quality indicators for the organization of palliative care in hospitals in Indonesia: a contribution to quality improvement.印度尼西亚医院姑息治疗组织质量指标的面部验证:对质量改进的贡献。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Dec;22(12):3301-10. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2343-8. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
7
The development of quality indicators to improve psychosocial care in dementia.制定质量指标以改善痴呆症的社会心理关怀。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Jun;24(6):921-30. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211002523. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
8
Development of a set of process and structure indicators for palliative care: the Europall project.制定一套姑息治疗过程和结构指标:Europall 项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 2;12:381. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-381.
9
Validation of quality indicators for the organization of palliative care: a modified RAND Delphi study in seven European countries (the Europall project).姑息治疗组织质量指标的验证:一项在七个欧洲国家开展的改良兰德德尔菲研究(欧洲姑息治疗项目)
Palliat Med. 2014 Feb;28(2):121-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216313493952. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
10
Quality Indicators of Primary Care Provider Engagement in Nursing Home Care.初级保健提供者参与养老院护理的质量指标。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Oct;19(10):824-832. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.08.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Tips for Managing Ethical Challenges in Advance Care Planning: A Qualitative Analysis of Japanese Practical Textbooks for Clinicians.提前医疗照护计划中管理伦理挑战的技巧:对日本临床医生实用教材的定性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 9;19(8):4550. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084550.
2
A multi-stage process to develop quality indicators for community-based palliative care using interRAI data.采用 interRAI 数据制定基于社区的姑息治疗质量指标的多阶段流程。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 7;17(4):e0266569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266569. eCollection 2022.
3
Large differences in the organization of palliative care in nursing homes in six European countries: findings from the PACE cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Actual and preferred place of death of home-dwelling patients in four European countries: making sense of quality indicators.四个欧洲国家居家患者的实际死亡地点和首选死亡地点:解读质量指标
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 8;9(4):e93762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093762. eCollection 2014.
2
Validation of quality indicators for the organization of palliative care: a modified RAND Delphi study in seven European countries (the Europall project).姑息治疗组织质量指标的验证:一项在七个欧洲国家开展的改良兰德德尔菲研究(欧洲姑息治疗项目)
Palliat Med. 2014 Feb;28(2):121-9. doi: 10.1177/0269216313493952. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
3
White paper defining optimal palliative care in older people with dementia: a Delphi study and recommendations from the European Association for Palliative Care.
六个欧洲国家养老院姑息治疗组织的巨大差异:PACE 横断面研究的结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Aug 25;20(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00827-x.
4
Using data linkage for national surveillance of clinical quality indicators for dementia care among Australian aged care users.利用数据链接对澳大利亚老年护理用户的痴呆症护理临床质量指标进行国家监测。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 21;11(1):10674. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89646-x.
5
Lay Caregivers' Experiences With Caring for Persons With Dementia: A Phenomenological Study.照顾者照顾痴呆症患者的体验:一项现象学研究。
J Gerontol Nurs. 2020 Aug 1;46(8):17-27. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20200527-02. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
6
Dying in acute hospitals: voices of bereaved relatives.在急症医院去世:失去亲人的亲属的声音。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 31;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0464-z.
7
A systematic review and critical appraisal of quality indicators to assess optimal palliative care for older people with dementia.系统评价和质量指标的批判性评估,以评估最佳的姑息治疗为老年痴呆症患者。
Palliat Med. 2019 Apr;33(4):415-429. doi: 10.1177/0269216319834227. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
8
Quality indicators for Palliative Day Services: A modified Delphi study.姑息治疗日间服务质量指标:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Palliat Med. 2019 Feb;33(2):197-205. doi: 10.1177/0269216318810601. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
9
Quality of care for the dying across different levels of palliative care development: A population-based cohort study.不同姑息治疗发展水平下临终关怀的护理质量:基于人群的队列研究。
Palliat Med. 2018 Dec;32(10):1596-1604. doi: 10.1177/0269216318801251. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
10
Staff Perspectives of Barriers to Access and Delivery of Palliative Care for Persons With Dementia in Long-Term Care.长期护理中痴呆患者获得姑息治疗的障碍及提供姑息治疗的障碍:工作人员观点
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2018 Aug;33(5):284-291. doi: 10.1177/1533317518765124. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
定义老年痴呆症患者最佳姑息治疗的白皮书:来自欧洲姑息治疗协会的德尔菲研究和建议。
Palliat Med. 2014 Mar;28(3):197-209. doi: 10.1177/0269216313493685. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
4
Quality indicators for palliative care: update of a systematic review.姑息治疗质量指标:系统评价更新。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Oct;46(4):556-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.09.013. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
5
Consensus building on access to controlled medicines: a four-stage Delphi consensus procedure.关于获取管制药品的共识建立:四阶段德尔菲共识程序。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Dec;46(6):897-910. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.01.014. Epub 2013 May 21.
6
Global framework for noncommunicable diseases: how can we monitor palliative care?全球非传染性疾病框架:我们如何监测姑息治疗?
J Palliat Med. 2013 Mar;16(3):226-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0493. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
7
Palliative medicine update: a multidisciplinary approach.缓和医学最新进展:多学科方法。
Pain Pract. 2013 Sep;13(7):576-88. doi: 10.1111/papr.12025. Epub 2012 Dec 14.
8
Development of a set of process and structure indicators for palliative care: the Europall project.制定一套姑息治疗过程和结构指标:Europall 项目。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 2;12:381. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-381.
9
Quality indicators for palliative care: debates and dilemmas.姑息治疗的质量指标:争论与困境
Palliat Med. 2012 Jul;26(5):679-80. doi: 10.1177/0269216312450123.
10
Quality indicators for care of cancer patients in their last days of life: literature update and experts' evaluation.癌症患者临终关怀质量指标:文献更新与专家评估。
J Palliat Med. 2012 Mar;15(3):308-16. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0393. Epub 2012 Feb 10.