• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管癌手术后的容积和结果:意大利伦巴第大区的经验。

Volume and outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery: the experience of the Region of Lombardy-Italy.

机构信息

General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Esophago-gastric Surgery-Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Via Manzoni, 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy,

出版信息

Updates Surg. 2013 Dec;65(4):271-5. doi: 10.1007/s13304-013-0227-y. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1007/s13304-013-0227-y
PMID:23943409
Abstract

Surgical procedures for cancer of the esophagus are complex operations, with considerable perioperative morbidity and mortality that require high use of resources. Recent reports indicate better results with centralization of these procedures, referring patients to high-volume dedicated hospitals. The aim of this study was to analyze the results of resective surgery for cancer of the esophagus and cardia performed in hospitals of the Region of Lombardy over the period 2005-2011, in terms of volume of operations, 30-day postoperative mortality, and length of hospitalization. The results showed a significant relation between reduction of mortality rate and number of resections performed in intermediate- and high-volume centers. In the Region of Lombardy there is an inverse relation between volume of esophagectomies in the single hospital, length of postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative 30-day mortality. Centralization of care on a regional level and standardized clinical pathways of diagnosis and care at single healthcare organizations and professionals should be implemented to improve clinical results in patients affected by esophageal and cardia cancer.

摘要

食管癌的外科手术是复杂的操作,围手术期发病率和死亡率相当高,需要大量的资源。最近的报告表明,将这些手术集中到高容量的专门医院进行,可以获得更好的结果。本研究旨在分析 2005-2011 年伦巴第大区医院进行的食管癌和贲门癌切除术的结果,包括手术量、30 天术后死亡率和住院时间。结果表明,死亡率的降低与中高容量中心进行的手术数量之间存在显著关系。在伦巴第大区,单个医院的食管癌切除术数量、术后住院时间和 30 天术后死亡率之间存在反比关系。应在区域层面集中治疗,并在单一医疗机构和专业人员中实施标准化的诊断和治疗临床路径,以改善食管癌和贲门癌患者的临床结果。

相似文献

1
Volume and outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery: the experience of the Region of Lombardy-Italy.食管癌手术后的容积和结果:意大利伦巴第大区的经验。
Updates Surg. 2013 Dec;65(4):271-5. doi: 10.1007/s13304-013-0227-y. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
2
Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Spontaneous Centralization in the US Contributed to Reduce Mortality Without Causing Health Disparities.食管癌手术:美国自发性集中化降低了死亡率且未造成健康差异。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;25(6):1580-1587. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6339-3. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
3
Perioperative outcomes of esophageal cancer surgery in a mid-volume institution in the era of centralization.集中化时代中等规模机构食管癌手术的围手术期结局
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2016 Sep;401(6):787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1477-1. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
Is Centralization Needed for Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Patients With Low Operative Risk?: A Nationwide Study.低手术风险的食管癌和胃癌患者需要集中治疗吗?一项全国性研究。
Ann Surg. 2016 Nov;264(5):823-830. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001768.
5
Esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: a comparison of findings and results after standard resection in three consecutive eight-year intervals with improved staging criteria.食管癌和贲门癌的食管胃切除术:采用改进的分期标准,对连续三个八年期间标准切除术后的结果和发现进行比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997 May;113(5):836-46; discussion 846-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(97)70256-3.
6
[Extent of radical surgery in cardia carcinoma--esophagectomy or gastrectomy?].[贲门癌根治手术的范围——食管切除术还是胃切除术?]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1996;113:169-72.
7
Survival, mortality and morbidity outcomes after oesophagogastric cancer surgery in New South Wales, 2001-2008.2001-2008 年新南威尔士州胃食管交界癌手术后的生存、死亡率和发病率结果。
Med J Aust. 2014 Apr 21;200(7):408-13. doi: 10.5694/mja13.11182.
8
Surgery for esophageal and cardia cancer in Hungary: a nationwide retrospective five-year survey.匈牙利食管癌和贲门癌手术:一项全国性五年回顾性调查。
Surg Today. 1996;26(5):368-72. doi: 10.1007/BF00311610.
9
Outcomes of Complex Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection at US News & World Report Top-Ranked vs Non-Ranked Hospitals.美国新闻与世界报道排名靠前的医院与非排名医院复杂胃肠道癌症切除术的结果比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Jul;233(1):21-27.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
10
Mortality after esophageal and gastric cancer resection.食管癌和胃癌切除术后的死亡率。
World J Surg. 2012 Nov;36(11):2630-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1724-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Hospital volume-mortality association after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.癌症患者食管癌切除术的医院容量-死亡率相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):3021-3029. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001185.
2
Incidence and treatment of mediastinal leakage after esophagectomy: Insights from the multicenter study on mediastinal leaks.食管癌切除术后纵隔漏的发生率和治疗:来自纵隔漏多中心研究的见解。
World J Gastroenterol. 2019 Jan 21;25(3):356-366. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.356.
3
Is There a Rationale for Structural Quality Assurance in Esophageal Surgery?

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in outcomes of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery across Europe.欧洲各地食管癌和胃癌手术结果的差异。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(1):83-94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8966. Epub 2012 Nov 23.
2
An enhanced recovery pathway decreases duration of stay after esophagectomy.加速康复路径可减少食管癌手术后的住院时间。
Surgery. 2012 Oct;152(4):606-14; discussion 614-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.021. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
3
Effect of hospital volume on postoperative mortality and survival after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2009.
食管手术中结构质量保证是否有理论依据?
Visc Med. 2017 May;33(2):135-139. doi: 10.1159/000458454. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
4
Surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it : A proposal for esophageal, hepatic, pancreatic and colo-rectal surgery.意大利的外科手术。确定有权开展该手术的医院科室和三级转诊中心的标准:关于食管、肝脏、胰腺和结直肠手术的提议
Updates Surg. 2016 Jun;68(2):115-6. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0378-8.
5
Esophageal surgery in Italy. Criteria to identify the hospital units and the tertiary referral centers entitled to perform it.意大利的食管手术。确定有权开展该手术的医院科室及三级转诊中心的标准。
Updates Surg. 2016 Jun;68(2):129-33. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0374-z. Epub 2016 May 30.
6
Intra-operative hypotensive episodes may be associated with post-operative esophageal anastomotic leak.术中低血压发作可能与术后食管吻合口漏有关。
Updates Surg. 2016 Jun;68(2):185-90. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0369-9. Epub 2016 May 5.
1989 年至 2009 年荷兰医院容量对食管和胃癌手术后术后死亡率和生存率的影响。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 May;48(7):1004-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.064. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
4
Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000-2011.手术治疗食管恶性肿瘤的量效关系:2000-2011 年系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 May;16(5):1055-63. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1731-3. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
5
The volume-outcome relation in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.食管癌手术治疗的量效关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer. 2012 Apr 1;118(7):1754-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26383. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
6
Hospital volume and survival in oesophagectomy and gastrectomy for cancer.癌症患者行食管癌切除术和胃癌切除术的医院容量与生存率。
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Nov;47(16):2408-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.07.001. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
7
Variation in esophagectomy outcomes in hospitals meeting Leapfrog volume outcome standards.符合莱普戈夫(Leapfrog)容量结局标准的医院中食管切除术结局的变化。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Apr;91(4):1003-9; discussion 1009-10. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.11.006.
8
In an era of health reform: defining cost differences in current esophageal cancer management strategies and assessing the cost of complications.在医疗改革时代:定义当前食管癌管理策略中的成本差异,并评估并发症的成本。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jan;141(1):16-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
9
Re-organisation of oesophago-gastric cancer care in England: progress and remaining challenges.英国食管癌和胃癌治疗的重新布局:进展与遗留挑战。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Nov 12;9:204. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-204.
10
Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery.与住院手术相关的医院死亡率差异。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1368-75. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0903048.