Monastyrskyy Bohdan, Kryshtafovych Andriy, Moult John, Tramontano Anna, Fidelis Krzysztof
Genome Center University of California, Davis, Davis, California, 95616.
Proteins. 2014 Feb;82 Suppl 2(0 2):127-37. doi: 10.1002/prot.24391. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
The article presents the assessment of disorder region predictions submitted to CASP10. The evaluation is based on the three measures tested in previous CASPs: (i) balanced accuracy, (ii) the Matthews correlation coefficient for the binary predictions, and (iii) the area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of predictions using probability annotation. We also performed new analyses such as comparison of the submitted predictions with those obtained with a Naïve disorder prediction method and with predictions from the disorder prediction databases D2P2 and MobiDB. On average, the methods participating in CASP10 demonstrated slightly better performance than those in CASP9.
本文介绍了对提交给CASP10的无序区域预测的评估。评估基于在前几届CASP中测试的三种指标:(i) 平衡准确率,(ii) 二元预测的马修斯相关系数,以及(iii) 使用概率注释的预测在接受者操作特征(ROC)分析中的曲线下面积。我们还进行了新的分析,例如将提交的预测与使用简单无序预测方法获得的预测以及与来自无序预测数据库D2P2和MobiDB的预测进行比较。平均而言,参与CASP10的方法表现略优于CASP9中的方法。