• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常用儿科粪便量表的评估:一项试点研究。

Assessment of commonly used pediatric stool scales: a pilot study.

作者信息

Saps M, Nichols-Vinueza D, Dhroove G, Adams P, Chogle A

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.

出版信息

Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2013 Jul-Sep;78(3):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.rgmx.2013.04.001
PMID:23948097
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) and a modified child-friendly version (M-BSFS) are frequently used in clinical practice and research. These scales have not been validated in children. 3-D stool scale models may be better adapted to the child's development.

AIMS

To assess the usefulness of the BSFS, M-BSFS, and a newly developed 3-D stool scale in children.

METHODS

Fifty children were asked to rank the picture cards of the BSFS and 3-D models from hardest to softest and to match the pictures with descriptors for each stool type.

RESULTS

Thirty percent of the children appropriately characterized the stools as hard, loose, or normal using the BSFS vs. 36.6% with the 3-D model (p=0.27). Appropriate correlation of stools as hard, loose, or normal consistency using the BSFS vs. the 3-D model by age group was: 6 to 11-year-olds, 27.5% vs. 33.3% (p=0.58) and 12 to 17-year-olds, 32.1% vs. 39.5% (p=0.41). Thirty-three percent correlated the BSFS pictures with the correct BSFS words, 46% appropriately correlated with the M-BSFS words, and 46% correlated the 3-D stool models with the correct wording.

CONCLUSIONS

The BSFS and M-BSFS that are widely used as stool assessment instruments are not user-friendly for children. The 3-D model was not found to be better than the BSFS and the M-BSFS.

摘要

背景

布里斯托大便形态量表(BSFS)及其改良的儿童友好版(M - BSFS)在临床实践和研究中经常被使用。这些量表尚未在儿童中得到验证。三维大便量表模型可能更适合儿童的发育情况。

目的

评估BSFS、M - BSFS和新开发的三维大便量表在儿童中的实用性。

方法

让50名儿童将BSFS的图片卡片和三维模型从最难到最软进行排序,并将图片与每种大便类型的描述词进行匹配。

结果

使用BSFS时,30%的儿童能正确将大便描述为硬、稀或正常,而使用三维模型时这一比例为36.6%(p = 0.27)。按年龄组划分,使用BSFS与三维模型对大便硬、稀或正常一致性的正确相关性为:6至11岁儿童,分别为27.5%和33.3%(p = 0.58);12至17岁儿童,分别为32.1%和39.5%(p = 0.41)。33%的儿童能将BSFS图片与正确的BSFS描述词相关联,46%能与M - BSFS描述词正确关联,46%能将三维大便模型与正确的描述词相关联。

结论

广泛用作大便评估工具的BSFS和M - BSFS对儿童来说并不方便使用。未发现三维模型比BSFS和M - BSFS更好。

相似文献

1
Assessment of commonly used pediatric stool scales: a pilot study.常用儿科粪便量表的评估:一项试点研究。
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 2013 Jul-Sep;78(3):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2013.04.001. Epub 2013 Aug 12.
2
Usefulness of Assessment of Stool Form by the Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale in Primary Care Pediatrics.改良布里斯托大便形状量表在基层儿科护理中评估大便形状的实用性。
Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2018 Apr;21(2):93-100. doi: 10.5223/pghn.2018.21.2.93. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
3
Bristol Stool Form Scale reliability and agreement decreases when determining Rome III stool form designations.在确定罗马III型粪便形态分类时,布里斯托大便分类法的可靠性和一致性会降低。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Mar;28(3):443-8. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12738. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
4
Validity and reliability of the Bristol Stool Form Scale in healthy adults and patients with diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.布里斯托大便性状量表在健康成年人及腹泻型肠易激综合征患者中的效度和信度
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Oct;44(7):693-703. doi: 10.1111/apt.13746. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
5
The Brussels Infant and Toddler Stool Scale: A Study on Interobserver Reliability.布鲁塞尔婴幼儿粪便量表:一项观察者间可靠性研究。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2019 Feb;68(2):207-213. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002153.
6
The Modified Bristol Stool Form Scale: A Reliable and Valid Tool to Score Stool Consistency in Dutch (Non)Toilet-trained Toddlers.改良布里斯托大便形状量表:一种可靠且有效的用于评估荷兰(非)如厕训练幼儿粪便稠度的工具。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021 Aug 1;73(2):210-216. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003186.
7
Assessing Children's Report of Stool Consistency: Agreement Between the Pediatric Rome III Questionnaire and the Bristol Stool Scale.评估儿童对粪便稠度的报告:儿科罗马III问卷与布里斯托大便分类法之间的一致性
J Pediatr. 2017 Nov;190:69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
8
Calcium Supplementation Does Not Contribute to Constipation in Healthy Women.补钙不会导致健康女性便秘。
Can J Diet Pract Res. 2016 Jun;77(2):103-5. doi: 10.3148/cjdpr-2015-043. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
9
Stool characteristics and colonic transit in irritable bowel syndrome: evaluation at two time points.肠易激综合征的粪便特征与结肠转运:两个时间点的评估
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;48(3):295-301. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2012.758767. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
10
Using the Bristol Stool Scale and Parental Report of Stool Consistency as Part of the Rome III Criteria for Functional Constipation in Infants and Toddlers.使用布里斯托大便分类法及家长对大便稠度的报告作为婴幼儿功能性便秘罗马Ⅲ标准的一部分。
J Pediatr. 2016 Oct;177:44-48.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.055. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the Bristol Stool Scale and Modified Version for Children: Use by Providers vs Children.布里斯托大便分类法及其儿童改良版的比较:医疗服务提供者与儿童的使用情况
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 21. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003218.
2
Machine Learning Supports Automated Digital Image Scoring of Stool Consistency in Diapers.机器学习支持对尿布中粪便稠度进行自动数字图像评分。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021 Feb 1;72(2):255-261. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003007.
3
Behavioral factors for predicting severity of enuresis and treatment responses in different compliance groups receiving behavioral therapy.
在接受行为疗法的不同依从性组中,用于预测遗尿严重程度和治疗反应的行为因素。
Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Jul-Aug;33(4):953-958. doi: 10.12669/pjms.334.12922.
4
Bristol Stool Form Scale reliability and agreement decreases when determining Rome III stool form designations.在确定罗马III型粪便形态分类时,布里斯托大便分类法的可靠性和一致性会降低。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Mar;28(3):443-8. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12738. Epub 2015 Dec 21.