• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“背痛残疾指数”(BADIX)在非特异性下背痛患者中的有效性和可靠性探索。

Exploration of the validity and reliability of the "backache disability index" (BADIX) in patients with non-specific low back pain.

作者信息

Farasyn Andre, Meeusen Romain, Nijs Jo, Cuesta-Vargas Antonio

机构信息

Faculty of Physical Education and Rehabilitation Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(4):451-9. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130405.

DOI:10.3233/BMR-130405
PMID:23948835
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In clinical examinations of a patient with non-specific low back pain (LBP), there is a need to dispose over a valid and quick to perform rating system. The "Backache Disability Index" for LBP or BADIX includes rating of 5 trunk movements in erect position and a "Morning Back Stiffness" score, whereof the sum gives the BADIX (max. 20 points). The objective of this study was to explore the reliability, responsiveness and concurrent validity of the BADIX. Patients with LBP (n=100) were randomly assigned into a "control" group (n=40) in function of validity studies, and a "treatment" group (n=60) in function of responsiveness studies. The treatment group underwent two weekly sessions of in total 30 minutes of deep cross-friction on the thoraco-lumbar Erector spinae and gluteals. All patients completed the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire validated Dutch version (ODQ), the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ). The impairment examination consists, besides current orthopaedic and neurologic examinations, of the new BADIX scoring system.

RESULTS

In our study the retest reliability after 3 days of the BADIX was perfect (n=039, r=0.95). A good correlation (p < 0.001) was found between BADIX at baseline, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (n=93, r=0.76), and McGill-Quality of Life Index (r=0.74). Similar discriminative ability and effect size of measures was found for BADIX and ODI (n=54). It is proposed that the minimal detectable change should be equal or more than 2 points.

CONCLUSIONS

The "Backache Disability Index" appears to be a reliable and a valid assessment tool of morning stiffness and restricted spinal movements, and discriminates between successful and unsuccessful treatment outcome. The BADIX will allow patients to take snapshots of their daily treatment evolution, save them on their computer or tablets (apps) and share the results with their doctors and/or therapists.

摘要

背景与目的

在对非特异性下背痛(LBP)患者进行临床检查时,需要一种有效且操作快速的评分系统。用于LBP的“背痛残疾指数”(BADIX)包括对直立位时5种躯干运动的评分以及一个“晨僵”分数,两者相加即得BADIX(最高20分)。本研究的目的是探讨BADIX的可靠性、反应性和同时效度。根据效度研究,将100例LBP患者随机分为“对照组”(n = 40),根据反应性研究分为“治疗组”(n = 60)。治疗组每周接受两次总计30分钟的胸腰段竖脊肌和臀肌深层交叉摩擦治疗。所有患者均完成了经荷兰语验证的Oswestry残疾问卷(ODQ)、麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)。除了当前的骨科和神经科检查外,损伤检查还包括新的BADIX评分系统。

结果

在我们的研究中,BADIX在3天后的重测信度极佳(n = 39,r = 0.95)。在基线时的BADIX与Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)(n = 93,r = 0.76)以及麦吉尔生活质量指数(r = 0.74)之间发现了良好的相关性(p < 0.001)。BADIX和ODI在鉴别能力和测量效应大小方面相似(n = 54)。建议最小可检测变化应等于或大于2分。

结论

“背痛残疾指数”似乎是一种可靠且有效的晨僵和脊柱活动受限评估工具,能够区分治疗成功与失败的结果。BADIX将使患者能够随时了解其日常治疗进展,将结果保存在电脑或平板电脑(应用程序)上,并与医生和/或治疗师分享。

相似文献

1
Exploration of the validity and reliability of the "backache disability index" (BADIX) in patients with non-specific low back pain.“背痛残疾指数”(BADIX)在非特异性下背痛患者中的有效性和可靠性探索。
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(4):451-9. doi: 10.3233/BMR-130405.
2
Validity of the new Backache Index (BAI) in patients with low back pain.新型背痛指数(BAI)在腰痛患者中的效度。
Spine J. 2006 Sep-Oct;6(5):565-71. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.01.021.
3
Hebrew adaptation and validation of a clinical-quantitative method of low back pain evaluation (the BADIX).希伯来文改编和验证一种用于下腰痛评估的临床量化方法(BADIX)。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Jul;27:176-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
4
Validity and reliability of English and Marathi Oswestry Disability Index (version 2.1a) in Indian population.英文和马拉地文 Oswestry 残疾指数(版本 2.1a)在印度人群中的有效性和可靠性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15;38(11):E662-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828a34c3.
5
Validation in Colombia of the Oswestry disability questionnaire in patients with low back pain.哥伦比亚低腰痛患者 Oswestry 残疾问卷的验证。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 15;36(26):E1730-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219d184.
6
The functional rating index: reliability and validity of the Persian language version in patients with low back pain.功能评定指数:在腰痛患者中评估波斯语版本的可靠性和有效性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):E1573-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182103282.
7
The Oswestry Disability Index (version 2.1a): validation of a Dutch language version.奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数(2.1a版):荷兰语版本的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Jan 15;40(2):E83-90. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000683.
8
Development of a French-Canadian version of the Oswestry Disability Index: cross-cultural adaptation and validation.《Oswestry 残疾指数的法加版本开发:跨文化调适与验证》。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 1;37(7):E439-44. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318233eaf9.
9
Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.针对腰痛患者的魁北克腰痛残疾量表土耳其语版本的验证
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Mar 15;34(6):E219-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181971e2d.
10
An assessment of a short composite questionnaire designed for use in an interventional spine pain management setting.用于介入性脊柱疼痛管理环境中的简短综合问卷评估。
PM R. 2012 Jun;4(6):413-8; quiz 418. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.03.018.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment Modalities for Aromatase Inhibitor-Associated Musculoskeletal Syndrome (AIMSS): A Scoping Review of Prospective Treatment Studies.芳香化酶抑制剂相关肌肉骨骼综合征(AIMSS)的治疗方式:前瞻性治疗研究的范围综述
J Pain Res. 2025 Apr 7;18:1853-1889. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S492891. eCollection 2025.
2
Smartphone applications are used for self-management, telerehabilitation, evaluation and data collection in low back pain healthcare: a scoping review.智能手机应用程序在低背痛医疗保健中用于自我管理、远程康复、评估和数据收集:范围综述。
F1000Res. 2024 May 7;11:1001. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.123331.2. eCollection 2022.
3
Functional Tests Predicting Return to Work of Workers with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: Are There Any Validated and Usable Functional Tests for Occupational Health Services in Everyday Practice? A Systematic Review.
功能测试预测非特异性下腰痛患者重返工作岗位的情况:在日常实践中,职业健康服务是否有经过验证和可用的功能测试?系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 15;20(6):5188. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065188.
4
Effect of neuromuscular taping on musculoskeletal disorders secondary to the use of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer survivors: a pragmatic randomised clinical trial.神经肌肉贴扎对乳腺癌幸存者使用芳香化酶抑制剂引起的肌肉骨骼疾病的影响:一项实用随机临床试验。
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018 Jun 11;18(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12906-018-2236-3.
5
Validation of a Spanish version of the Spine Functional Index.脊柱功能指数西班牙语版本的验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jun 27;12:96. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-96.