Purdue University, Department of Nutrition Science, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2013 Aug 15;120:173-81. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.08.013.
Chewing reportedly contributes to satiation and satiety signals. Attempts to document and quantify this have led to small and inconsistent effects. The present trial manipulated oral processing effort though required chewing of gums of different hardness and measured appetitive sensations, energy intake, gastric emptying, GI transit time, and concentrations of glucose, insulin, GLP-1, ghrelin and pancreatic polypeptide. Sixty adults classified by sex and BMI (15 each of lean females, obese females, lean males and obese males) were tested in a randomized, controlled, cross-over trial with three arms. They chewed nothing, soft gum or hard gum for 15 min while sipping grape juice (10% of individual energy needs) containing acetaminophen and lactulose on one day each separated by 7 days. Electromyographic recordings and self-reports were obtained during and after chewing to quantify oral processing effort. Blood was sampled through an indwelling catheter and appetite ratings were obtained at baseline and at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180 and 240 min after chewing initiation. Breath samples were collected at 10 min intervals for the first 2h and at 30 min intervals for the next 2h. No effects of chewing were observed for appetitive sensations or gut peptide concentrations. Energy intake tended to decline in lean and increase in obese participants so that daily energy intake differed significantly between the two groups when chewing either gum, while no difference was observed on the non-chewing day. Serum glucose and insulin were significantly lower at selected time points 90-240 min after chewing compared to baseline and the non-chewing day. These data indicate chewing effort does not affect appetitive sensations or gut peptide secretion, but may exert a small differential effect on acute energy intake in lean and obese individuals and lead to greater post-prandial declines of serum glucose and insulin. The efficacy of gum chewing as a substitute for eating for weight management remains uncertain.
咀嚼据称有助于产生饱腹感和满足感信号。尝试记录和量化这些信号导致了效果较小且不一致。本试验通过要求咀嚼不同硬度的口香糖来操纵口腔处理的难度,并测量了食欲感觉、能量摄入、胃排空、胃肠道转运时间以及葡萄糖、胰岛素、GLP-1、胃饥饿素和胰多肽的浓度。60 名按性别和 BMI 分类的成年人(每组 15 名,包括瘦女性、肥胖女性、瘦男性和肥胖男性)在一项随机、对照、交叉试验中接受了三种处理方式的测试。他们在一天内分别咀嚼 15 分钟无物、软胶或硬胶,同时小口饮葡萄汁(占个人能量需求的 10%),葡萄汁中含有对乙酰氨基酚和乳果糖。在咀嚼过程中和咀嚼结束后进行肌电图记录和自我报告,以量化口腔处理难度。在开始咀嚼后的 0、15、30、45、60、90、120、180 和 240 分钟时采集血样,并在基线和咀嚼开始后 10 分钟采集一次、之后 30 分钟采集一次进行食欲评分。在最初的 2 小时内每隔 10 分钟采集一次呼气样本,之后的 2 小时内每隔 30 分钟采集一次。咀嚼对食欲感觉或肠道肽浓度没有影响。在瘦参与者中,能量摄入有下降趋势,在肥胖参与者中则有增加趋势,因此当咀嚼任何一种口香糖时,两组之间的日能量摄入差异显著,而在非咀嚼日则没有差异。与基线和非咀嚼日相比,咀嚼后 90-240 分钟时血清葡萄糖和胰岛素的某些时间点明显降低。这些数据表明,咀嚼难度不会影响食欲感觉或肠道肽分泌,但可能对瘦和肥胖个体的急性能量摄入产生微小的差异影响,并导致餐后血清葡萄糖和胰岛素水平更大幅度的下降。咀嚼口香糖作为控制体重的饮食替代方法的疗效仍不确定。