Haberl Helmut
Institute of Social Ecology Vienna (SEC), Alpen-Adria Universitaet (AAU) A-1070, Schottenfeldgasse 29, Vienna, Austria.
Glob Change Biol Bioenergy. 2013 Jul;5(4):351-357. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12071. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
The notion that biomass combustion is carbon neutral vis-a-vis the atmosphere because carbon released during biomass combustion is absorbed during plant regrowth is inherent in the greenhouse gas accounting rules in many regulations and conventions. But this 'carbon neutrality' assumption of bioenergy is an oversimplification that can result in major flaws in emission accounting; it may even result in policies that increase, instead of reduce, overall greenhouse gas emissions. This commentary discusses the systemic feedbacks and ecosystem succession/land-use history issues ignored by the carbon neutrality assumption. Based on recent literature, three cases are elaborated which show that the C balance of bioenergy may range from highly beneficial to strongly detrimental, depending on the plants grown, the land used (including its land-use history) as well as the fossil energy replaced. The article concludes by proposing the concept of GHG cost curves of bioenergy as a means for optimizing the climate benefits of bioenergy policies.
许多法规和公约中的温室气体核算规则都有这样一种观念,即生物质燃烧相对于大气而言是碳中性的,因为生物质燃烧过程中释放的碳在植物重新生长过程中会被吸收。但这种生物能源的“碳中性”假设过于简单化,可能导致排放核算出现重大缺陷;甚至可能导致政策非但没有减少,反而增加了总体温室气体排放。本评论讨论了碳中性假设所忽略的系统反馈以及生态系统演替/土地利用历史问题。基于近期文献,阐述了三个案例,这些案例表明,生物能源的碳平衡可能从非常有益到极为有害不等,这取决于种植的植物、使用的土地(包括其土地利用历史)以及被替代的化石能源。文章最后提出了生物能源温室气体成本曲线的概念,作为优化生物能源政策气候效益的一种手段。