• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生命早期益生菌干预、特应性和哮喘:临床试验的荟萃分析。

Probiotic administration in early life, atopy, and asthma: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2013 Sep;132(3):e666-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0246. Epub 2013 Aug 19.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2013-0246
PMID:23958764
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Probiotics may reduce the risk of atopy and asthma in children. However, results from clinical trials have been conflicting, and several of them may have been underpowered. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials to assess the effects of probiotic supplementation on atopic sensitization and asthma/wheeze prevention in children.

METHODS

Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk estimates. Meta-regression was conducted to examine the effect of potential factors on probiotics efficacy.

RESULTS

Probiotics were effective in reducing total immunoglobulin E (IgE) (mean reduction: -7.59 U/mL [95% confidence interval (CI): -14.96 to -0.22]; P = .044). Meta-regression showed that the reduction in IgE was more pronounced with longer follow-up. Probiotics significantly reduced the risk of atopic sensitization when administered prenatally (relative risk: 0.88 [95% CI: 0.78 to 0.99]; P = .035 for positive result on the skin prick test and/or elevated specific IgE to common allergens) and postnatally (relative risk: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.75 to 0.98]; P = .027 for positive result on skin prick test). Administration of Lactobacillus acidophilus, compared with other strains, was associated with an increased risk of atopic sensitization (P = .002). Probiotics did not significantly reduce asthma/wheeze (relative risk: 0.96 [95% CI: 0.85 to 1.07]).

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal and/or early-life probiotic administration reduces the risk of atopic sensitization and decreases the total IgE level in children but may not reduce the risk of asthma/wheeze. Follow-up duration and strain significantly modified these effects. Future trials for asthma prevention should carefully select probiotic strain and consider longer follow-up.

摘要

背景与目的

益生菌可能降低儿童特应性和哮喘的风险。然而,临床试验的结果相互矛盾,其中一些可能效力不足。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,纳入了随机、安慰剂对照试验,以评估益生菌补充对儿童特应性致敏和预防哮喘/喘息的效果。

方法

采用随机效应模型计算汇总风险估计值。进行了元回归分析,以研究潜在因素对益生菌疗效的影响。

结果

益生菌能有效降低总免疫球蛋白 E(IgE)(平均降低:-7.59 U/mL [95%置信区间(CI):-14.96 至-0.22];P =.044)。元回归分析显示,随着随访时间的延长,IgE 的降低更为显著。益生菌在产前(相对风险:0.88 [95% CI:0.78 至 0.99];P =.035 时皮试和/或常见过敏原特异性 IgE 升高呈阳性)和产后(相对风险:0.86 [95% CI:0.75 至 0.98];P =.027 时皮试呈阳性)给予时,能显著降低特应性致敏的风险。与其他菌株相比,给予嗜酸乳杆菌与特应性致敏风险增加相关(P =.002)。益生菌不能显著降低哮喘/喘息的风险(相对风险:0.96 [95% CI:0.85 至 1.07])。

结论

产前和/或生命早期益生菌的给予能降低儿童特应性致敏的风险,降低 IgE 总水平,但可能不会降低哮喘/喘息的风险。随访时间和菌株显著改变了这些效果。未来预防哮喘的试验应仔细选择益生菌菌株,并考虑更长的随访时间。

相似文献

1
Probiotic administration in early life, atopy, and asthma: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.生命早期益生菌干预、特应性和哮喘:临床试验的荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2013 Sep;132(3):e666-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0246. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
2
Probiotics supplementation during pregnancy or infancy for the prevention of atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis.孕期或婴儿期补充益生菌预防特应性皮炎:荟萃分析。
Epidemiology. 2012 May;23(3):402-14. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31824d5da2.
3
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of probiotics for primary prevention: no clinical effects of Lactobacillus GG supplementation.益生菌用于一级预防的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验:补充鼠李糖乳杆菌GG无临床效果。
Pediatrics. 2008 Apr;121(4):e850-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1492. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
4
Prevention of allergic disease in childhood: clinical and epidemiological aspects of primary and secondary allergy prevention.儿童过敏性疾病的预防:一级和二级过敏预防的临床与流行病学方面
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2004 Jun;15 Suppl 16:4-5, 9-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2004.0148b.x.
5
Probiotics in primary prevention of atopic disease: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.益生菌在特应性疾病一级预防中的作用:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2001 Apr 7;357(9262):1076-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04259-8.
6
[Meta-analysis of probiotics preventing allergic diseases in infants].[益生菌预防婴儿过敏性疾病的荟萃分析]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Jul;50(7):504-9.
7
Effect of probiotic mix (Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bifidobacterium lactis, Lactobacillus acidophilus) in the primary prevention of eczema: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.益生菌混合制剂(双歧双歧杆菌、乳双歧杆菌、嗜酸乳杆菌)对湿疹一级预防的效果:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2010 Mar;21(2 Pt 2):e386-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2009.00958.x. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
8
Probiotic supplementation for the first 6 months of life fails to reduce the risk of atopic dermatitis and increases the risk of allergen sensitization in high-risk children: a randomized controlled trial.对高危儿童在出生后头6个月补充益生菌不能降低患特应性皮炎的风险,反而会增加过敏原致敏风险:一项随机对照试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Jan;119(1):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.08.036. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
9
Prenatal and postnatal probiotics reduces maternal but not childhood allergic diseases: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.产前和产后益生菌可减少母体而非儿童期过敏疾病:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2012 Sep;42(9):1386-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2012.04037.x.
10
Probiotics and prevention of atopic disease: 4-year follow-up of a randomised placebo-controlled trial.益生菌与特应性疾病的预防:一项随机安慰剂对照试验的4年随访
Lancet. 2003 May 31;361(9372):1869-71. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13490-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics on the prevention and treatment of atopic dermatitis in children: an umbrella meta-analysis.益生元、益生菌和合生元对儿童特应性皮炎防治的影响:一项伞状荟萃分析。
Front Pediatr. 2025 Mar 21;13:1498965. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1498965. eCollection 2025.
2
Oral microbiota and respiratory diseases: advances and perspectives.口腔微生物群与呼吸道疾病:进展与展望
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2025 Jun 12;38(2):e0015024. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00150-24. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
3
The role of the early-life gut microbiome in childhood asthma.
早期肠道微生物群在儿童哮喘中的作用。
Gut Microbes. 2025 Dec;17(1):2457489. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2457489. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
4
Traditional pediatric massage enhanced the skeletal muscle mass in OVA-exposed adolescent rats via regulating SCFAs-FFAR2-IGF-1/AKT pathway.传统小儿推拿通过调节短链脂肪酸-游离脂肪酸受体2-胰岛素样生长因子-1/蛋白激酶B通路增加卵清蛋白致敏青春期大鼠的骨骼肌质量。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Jan 3;15:1492783. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1492783. eCollection 2024.
5
Non-pharmacological interventions for asthma prevention and management across the life course: Umbrella review.贯穿生命历程的哮喘预防与管理的非药物干预措施:伞状综述
Clin Transl Allergy. 2024 Mar;14(3):e12344. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12344.
6
Nutritional Status of Breastfeeding Mothers and Impact of Diet and Dietary Supplementation: A Narrative Review.母乳喂养母亲的营养状况以及饮食与膳食补充剂的影响:一项叙述性综述
Nutrients. 2024 Jan 19;16(2):301. doi: 10.3390/nu16020301.
7
The Microbiota and Equine Asthma: An Integrative View of the Gut-Lung Axis.微生物群与马哮喘:肠道-肺轴的综合观点
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jan 13;14(2):253. doi: 10.3390/ani14020253.
8
Prevention of exacerbation in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD with the intent to modulate respiratory microbiome: a pilot prospective, multi-center, randomized controlled trial.旨在调节呼吸道微生物群以预防中重度至极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者病情加重:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验的初步研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 5;10:1265544. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1265544. eCollection 2023.
9
Molecular Mechanism and Clinical Effects of Probiotics in the Management of Cow's Milk Protein Allergy.益生菌在管理牛奶蛋白过敏中的分子机制和临床效果。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 6;24(12):9781. doi: 10.3390/ijms24129781.
10
The Role of the Microbiome in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Asthma.微生物群在哮喘发病机制及治疗中的作用
Biomedicines. 2023 Jun 2;11(6):1618. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11061618.