Hughes David, Williams-Jones Bryn
Doctoral Student, Applied Human Sciences (Bioethics Option), Bioethics Programme, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC.
Healthc Policy. 2013 Aug;9(1):52-64.
In the context of scarce public resources, patient interest groups have increasingly turned to private organizations for financing, including the pharmaceutical industry. This practice puts advocacy groups in a situation of potential conflicts between the interests of patients and those of the drug companies. The interests of patients and industry can converge on issues related to the approval and reimbursement of medications. But even on this issue, interests do not always align perfectly. Using the Quebec example of Coalition Priorité Cancer (CPC) as a case study, we examine the ethical issues raised by such financial relationships in the context of drug reimbursement decision-making. We collected, compiled and analyzed publicly available information on the CPC's organization and activities; this approach allowed us to raise and discuss important questions regarding the possible influence exerted on patient groups by donors. We conclude with some recommendations.
在公共资源稀缺的背景下,患者利益集团越来越多地转向包括制药行业在内的私人组织寻求资金支持。这种做法使倡导团体陷入患者利益与制药公司利益之间潜在冲突的境地。患者和行业的利益可能在与药物审批和报销相关的问题上趋于一致。但即使在这个问题上,利益也并非总是完全一致。以魁北克的癌症优先联盟(CPC)为例进行案例研究,我们探讨了在药物报销决策背景下这种财务关系引发的伦理问题。我们收集、整理并分析了关于CPC组织和活动的公开信息;这种方法使我们能够提出并讨论有关捐赠者可能对患者群体施加影响的重要问题。我们最后提出了一些建议。