BMC Med Educ. 2013 Aug 23;13:114. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-114.
Despite rapid growth and development of medical technology, personal relationship between the patient and physician remains the basis of high quality treatment. The aim of our study was to develop, implement and evaluate patient therapeutic letters written by students as a tool in teaching family medicine.
The study included all 6th year students attending their rounds in family medicine, structured into two 10-day cycles, one in urban offices and one in offices on the Adriatic islands (rural). After receiving detailed instructions, students wrote letters to two patients after a consultation in the office. The letters were audited by patients and 3 family medicine experts who used a grading instrument (scale 0 - poor, 1 - medium, 2 - good) for 1) adequacy and clarity of description of patients' disease/state, 2) knowledge, 3) adequacy of recommendations, 4) courtesy and respect and 5) language and style. Patients and experts were also asked to underline phrases they thought would be difficult to understand; the underlined text was subjected to content analysis.
Both the patients and the experts gave high scores for the value and quality of the letters in terms of the description of the problem, adequacy of recommendations given, and courtesy and respect (mean (±standard deviation) 5.65 ± 0.79 for patients vs. 4.87 ± 0.79 for experts out of maximum score of 6). Family medicine experts were stricter than patients in their evaluation of the content of the letters (adequacy and clarity of disease description (P < 0.001) and adequacy of recommendations (P < 0.001). Both the patients and the experts seemed to like longer letters as the length of the letter showed significant positive correlation with the quality summary score (correlation r = 0.492 vs. r = 0.338, respectively, P < 0.010). Overlapping of the text underlined as difficult to understand by patients and experts was found in 10 (11.6%) out of 86 letters. The highest overlap (20 terms) was found for the category "Technical terms unclear to a lay reader".
Writing of a letter to their first patients may be a useful tool for students to personally experience the practice of medicine and establish better partnership with patients in health care.
尽管医学技术迅速发展和进步,但医患之间的个人关系仍然是高质量治疗的基础。我们研究的目的是开发、实施和评估由学生撰写的治疗患者信件,作为家庭医学教学的一种工具。
该研究包括所有参加家庭医学轮转的 6 年级学生,分为两个为期 10 天的周期,一个在城市办公室,一个在亚得里亚海岛屿(农村)的办公室。在接受详细指导后,学生在办公室就诊后给两位患者写了信。信件由患者和 3 名家庭医学专家审核,专家使用评分工具(0-差,1-中,2-好)对以下方面进行评分:1)对患者疾病/状况的描述的充分性和清晰度,2)知识,3)建议的充分性,4)礼貌和尊重,5)语言和风格。患者和专家还被要求在他们认为难以理解的短语下划线;下划线的文本进行内容分析。
患者和专家都对信件在问题描述、建议的充分性以及礼貌和尊重方面的价值和质量给予了很高的评价(患者平均(±标准差)为 5.65±0.79,专家为 4.87±0.79,满分 6 分)。家庭医学专家在评估信件内容时比患者更严格(疾病描述的充分性和清晰度(P<0.001)和建议的充分性(P<0.001)。患者和专家似乎都喜欢更长的信件,因为信件的长度与质量总结评分呈显著正相关(相关 r=0.492 与 r=0.338,分别,P<0.010)。患者和专家认为难以理解的下划线文本有 10 处(86 封信中有 11.6%)存在重叠。重叠最多的(20 个术语)是“对非专业读者来说不清楚的技术术语”这一类别。
给他们的第一位患者写信可能是学生个人体验医学实践并在医疗保健中与患者建立更好伙伴关系的有用工具。