Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜全胃或近端胃切除术后经口内置入吻合器(OrVil)行管腔内圆形吻合在安全性方面与体外吻合的比较。

Safety of intracorporeal circular stapling esophagojejunostomy using trans-orally inserted anvil (OrVil) following laparoscopic total or proximal gastrectomy - comparison with extracorporeal anastomosis.

机构信息

Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yeouido St, Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, #62 Yeouido-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 150-713, South Korea.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Aug 23;11:209. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-209.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There have been several attempts to develop a unique and easier way to perform esophagojejunostomy during laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy or laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy. The OrVil system (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) is one of those methods, but its technical and oncologic feasibility have not been proven and need to be observed.

METHODS

Among 87 patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG; 79 cases) and laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with double tract anastomosis (LAPG_DT; 8 cases) from April 2004, 47 patients underwent the conventional extracorporeal method (Group I; 2004-2008) were compared with 40 patients treated with the intracorporeal OrVil system (Group II; 2009-2012).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in clinicopathologic characteristics between the two groups except tumor location; more cardia lesions were involved in group II (p = 0.012). The mean time for esophagojejunostomy (E-J), defined as the time from anvil insertion to closure of the jejunal entry site has no significant difference (Group I vs II: 22.2 ± 3.2 min vs 18.6 ± 3.5 min, p = 0.623). In terms of anastomotic complication, there was no significant difference in E-J leakage and stricture. E-J leakage occurred in 2 out of 47 (4.3%) cases in group I and 2 out of 40 (5%) in group II (p = 0.628); half of them were treated conservatively in each group and the others underwent reoperation. E-J stricture occurred in 2 (4.3%) cases in group I and 1 (2.5%) in group II (p = 0.561), which required postoperative gastrofiberscopic balloon dilatation.

CONCLUSIONS

Esophagojejunostomy using the OrVil system was a feasible and safe technique compared with the conventional extracorporeal method through mini-laparotomy in terms of anastomotic complications. Moreover, it can help to reduce surgeon's stress regarding esophagojejunostomy because it needs no purse-string procedure and serves a secure operation view laparoscopically.

摘要

背景

为了在腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术或腹腔镜辅助近端胃切除术期间施行独特且更简单的食管空肠吻合术,已经进行了多次尝试。OrVil 系统(Covidien,Mansfield,MA,美国)是其中一种方法,但它的技术和肿瘤学可行性尚未得到证实,需要进行观察。

方法

在 2004 年 4 月至 2012 年期间,87 例接受腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术(LATG;79 例)和腹腔镜辅助双通道吻合近端胃切除术(LAPG_DT;8 例)的患者中,47 例行传统的体外方法(I 组;2004-2008 年)与 40 例接受腔内 OrVil 系统治疗的患者(II 组;2009-2012 年)进行比较。

结果

两组患者的临床病理特征除肿瘤位置外无明显差异;II 组更多的贲门病变(p=0.012)。食管空肠吻合术(E-J)的平均时间(从吻合器插入到空肠入口闭合的时间)无显著差异(I 组 vs II 组:22.2±3.2min vs 18.6±3.5min,p=0.623)。在吻合口并发症方面,E-J 漏和狭窄无显著差异。I 组有 2 例(4.3%)和 II 组有 2 例(5%)发生 E-J 漏(p=0.628);每组各有一半经保守治疗,其余均行再次手术。I 组有 2 例(4.3%)和 II 组有 1 例(2.5%)发生 E-J 狭窄(p=0.561),需要术后胃纤维镜球囊扩张。

结论

与通过小切口进行的传统体外方法相比,使用 OrVil 系统行食管空肠吻合术在吻合口并发症方面是一种可行且安全的技术。此外,它可以帮助减轻外科医生对食管空肠吻合术的压力,因为它不需要荷包缝合程序,并提供安全的腹腔镜手术视野。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8681/3765957/457d170a6a0f/1477-7819-11-209-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验