University of York, UK.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Sep;21(9):1290-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.007.
To compare the effectiveness of acupuncture with other relevant physical treatments for alleviating pain due to knee osteoarthritis.
Systematic review with network meta-analysis, to allow comparison of treatments within a coherent framework. Comprehensive searches were undertaken up to January 2013 to identify randomised controlled trials in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, which reported pain.
Of 156 eligible studies, 114 trials (covering 22 treatments and 9,709 patients) provided data suitable for analysis. Most trials studied short-term effects and many were classed as being of poor quality with high risk of bias, commonly associated with lack of blinding (which was sometimes impossible to achieve). End of treatment results showed that eight interventions: interferential therapy, acupuncture, TENS, pulsed electrical stimulation, balneotherapy, aerobic exercise, sham acupuncture, and muscle-strengthening exercise produced a statistically significant reduction in pain when compared with standard care. In a sensitivity analysis of satisfactory and good quality studies, most studies were of acupuncture (11 trials) or muscle-strengthening exercise (9 trials); both interventions were statistically significantly better than standard care, with acupuncture being statistically significantly better than muscle-strengthening exercise (standardised mean difference: 0.49, 95% credible interval 0.00-0.98).
As a summary of the current available research, the network meta-analysis results indicate that acupuncture can be considered as one of the more effective physical treatments for alleviating osteoarthritis knee pain in the short-term. However, much of the evidence in this area of research is of poor quality, meaning there is uncertainty about the efficacy of many physical treatments.
比较针灸与其他相关物理治疗缓解膝骨关节炎疼痛的效果。
系统评价与网络荟萃分析,允许在一个连贯的框架内比较治疗方法。全面检索截至 2013 年 1 月的随机对照试验,以确定报告膝关节骨关节炎疼痛的患者的试验。
在 156 项合格研究中,114 项试验(涵盖 22 种治疗方法和 9709 名患者)提供了适合分析的数据。大多数试验研究了短期效果,许多试验被归类为质量差且存在高偏倚风险,通常与缺乏盲法(有时无法实现)有关。治疗结束时的结果表明,八种干预措施:干扰电疗法、针灸、经皮电神经刺激、温泉疗法、有氧运动、假针灸和肌肉强化运动与标准护理相比,疼痛明显减轻。在对满意和高质量研究的敏感性分析中,大多数研究是关于针灸(11 项试验)或肌肉强化运动(9 项试验);这两种干预措施都明显优于标准护理,针灸明显优于肌肉强化运动(标准化均数差:0.49,95%可信区间 0.00-0.98)。
作为当前现有研究的总结,网络荟萃分析结果表明,针灸可被视为缓解膝关节骨关节炎疼痛的更有效物理治疗方法之一,短期有效。然而,该领域研究中的大部分证据质量较差,这意味着许多物理治疗方法的疗效存在不确定性。