Cooper Brittany Rhoades, Bumbarger Brian K, Moore Julia E
Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA,
Prev Sci. 2015 Jan;16(1):145-57. doi: 10.1007/s11121-013-0427-1.
Over the past four decades, significant strides have been made in the science of preventing youth problem behaviors. Subsequently, policymakers and funders have begun to insist on the use of evidence-based programs (EBPs) as a requirement for funding. However, unless practitioners are able to sustain these programs beyond initial seed funding, they are unlikely to achieve their ultimate goal of broad public health impact. Despite its obvious importance, sustainability has received relatively little attention in prevention science until recently. Moreover, there have been few opportunities to study the correlates of sustainability in large-scale, multi-year initiatives involving multiple programs. The present study examined rates of sustainment of a wide range of proven-effective prevention and intervention programs; identified factors related to organizational support and readiness, program and implementer characteristics, and sustainability planning that distinguished sustained programs; and examined variability in these associations across classroom-based, community/mentoring, family-focused prevention, and family treatment program types within the context of a state-wide EBP dissemination initiative in Pennsylvania over 4 years. The majority of EBPs sustained functioning 2 years or more beyond their initial funding. In general, sustained programs reported greater community coalition functioning, communication to key stakeholders, knowledge of the program's logical model, communication with the trainer or program developer, and sustainability planning. In addition to these universal correlates, important program-specific correlates emerged as well. Implications for the technical assistance and support necessary to promote the sustainability of EBPs in nonresearch contexts are also discussed.
在过去的四十年里,预防青少年问题行为的科学取得了重大进展。随后,政策制定者和资助者开始坚持将使用循证项目(EBPs)作为资助的一项要求。然而,除非从业者能够在初始种子资金之外维持这些项目,否则它们不太可能实现其广泛的公共卫生影响这一最终目标。尽管可持续性具有明显的重要性,但直到最近,它在预防科学中受到的关注相对较少。此外,在涉及多个项目的大规模、多年度倡议中,研究可持续性相关因素的机会也很少。本研究考察了一系列经证实有效的预防和干预项目的维持率;确定了与组织支持和准备情况、项目及实施者特征以及区分持续实施项目的可持续性规划相关的因素;并在宾夕法尼亚州一项为期4年的全州循证项目推广倡议的背景下,考察了这些关联在基于课堂的、社区/辅导、以家庭为重点的预防以及家庭治疗项目类型中的差异。大多数循证项目在初始资金之后持续运作了两年或更长时间。总体而言,持续实施的项目报告称社区联盟运作更好、与关键利益相关者的沟通更顺畅、对项目逻辑模型的了解更深入、与培训师或项目开发者的沟通更频繁以及可持续性规划更完善。除了这些普遍相关因素外,还出现了重要的项目特定相关因素。文中还讨论了在非研究背景下促进循证项目可持续性所需的技术援助和支持的意义。