Swindle Taren, Bellows Laura L, Mitchell Virginia, Johnson Susan L, Shakya Samjhana, Zhang Dong, Selig James P, Whiteside-Mansell Leanne, Curran Geoffrey M
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States.
Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Front Health Serv. 2022 Nov 9;2:1010305. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1010305. eCollection 2022.
The goal of the present study was to investigate factors associated with sustainment of two evidence-based programs for nutrition promotion in early care and education (ECE) settings - Food Friends (FF) and Together, We Inspire Smart Eating (WISE).
In a cross-sectional study design, ECE directors ( = 55) from centers that had previously been trained in WISE or FF completed a survey. Program-specific measures included Steckler's Perception of Innovations, the Program Sustainability Assessment Tool (PSAT), and the Organizational Readiness for Change Assessment (ORCA). For our primary outcomes, two measures of sustainment were examined: Nutrition Continued Practice (i.e., the use of or general focus on nutrition programs) and Program Fidelity (i.e., how well centers used specific evidence-based practices of WISE or FF). Multiple regression was used to determine the association of these outcomes with program, years since last implementation, and overall scores on predictors. Follow-up correlation analyses were used to investigate outcome relationships with context submeasures due to high intercorrelations between predictor submeasures.
Nutrition Continued Practice was significantly predicted by program and overall PSAT score. WISE programs had significantly higher Nutrition Continued Practice scores than FF program ( = 0.03). All subscales of the PSAT (e.g., environmental support, funding stability, organizational capacity, program adaptation, communications, and strategic planning) were significantly correlated with Nutrition Continued Practice (all rs > 0.30, all ps < 0.03). Program Fidelity was significantly predicted by PSAT and Steckler Perception of Innovation scores. All subscales of the PSAT were strongly positively correlated with Program Fidelity (all rs > 0.48, all ps < 0.001); relative advantage (r = 0.54, < 0.001) and level of institutionalization (r = 0.61, < 0.001) were positively correlated with Program Fidelity.
This study suggests that factors associated with the continued practice of program principles are partially distinct from those that are associated with the sustainment of specific practices driving program fidelity. Results suggest capacity building strategies may be important for both continued attention to nutrition and physical activity as well as sustaining fidelity to specific evidence-based practices.
本研究的目的是调查与早期护理和教育(ECE)环境中两种基于证据的营养促进计划——食物伙伴(FF)和“我们共同激励明智饮食”(WISE)的持续实施相关的因素。
在一项横断面研究设计中,来自之前接受过WISE或FF培训的中心的ECE主任(n = 55)完成了一项调查。特定计划的测量指标包括斯特克勒创新感知量表、计划可持续性评估工具(PSAT)和组织变革准备评估(ORCA)。对于我们的主要结果,研究了两种持续实施的测量指标:营养持续实践(即营养计划的使用或总体关注)和计划保真度(即各中心对WISE或FF特定循证实践的运用程度)。使用多元回归来确定这些结果与计划、自上次实施以来的年份以及预测指标的总体得分之间的关联。由于预测指标子量表之间的高度相互关联,后续的相关分析用于研究结果与背景子量表之间的关系。
营养持续实践由计划和PSAT总体得分显著预测。WISE计划的营养持续实践得分显著高于FF计划(p = 0.03)。PSAT的所有子量表(如环境支持、资金稳定性、组织能力、计划适应性、沟通和战略规划)均与营养持续实践显著相关(所有r值> 0.30,所有p值< 0.03)。计划保真度由PSAT和斯特克勒创新感知得分显著预测。PSAT的所有子量表均与计划保真度呈强正相关(所有r值> 0.48,所有p值< 0.001);相对优势(r = 0.54,p < 0.001)和制度化程度(r = 0.61,p < 0.001)与计划保真度呈正相关。
本研究表明,与计划原则持续实践相关的因素与那些与驱动计划保真度的特定实践的持续实施相关的因素部分不同。结果表明,能力建设策略对于持续关注营养和身体活动以及维持对特定循证实践的保真度可能都很重要。