Soo H, Sherman K A, Kangas M
Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia,
J Behav Med. 2014 Aug;37(4):793-805. doi: 10.1007/s10865-013-9531-8. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
The cognitive style of rumination extends existing cognitive models of emotional response to illness. In the absence of a specific measure, we developed the Multidimensional Rumination in Illness Scale (MRIS). In Study 1, an initial 60-item pool was tested, followed by confirmation of the factor structure in Study 2. In Study 1 participants (n = 185) completed the pilot version of the MRIS, then in Study 2 (n = 163) a reduced 41-item model was tested. Study 1: Exploratory factor analysis of a reduced 32-item scale indicated an initial four-factor solution for the MRIS (Intrusion, Brooding, Instrumental, Preventability), with satisfactory internal consistency and stable factor structure across gender. Study 2: Following scale revision, confirmatory factor analysis substantiated the adequacy of a three-factor MRIS structure, and good internal consistency, test-rest reliability, and concurrent and discriminant validity was demonstrated for the MRIS. The MRIS exhibited good psychometric properties in the current sample, providing a comprehensive assessment of the cognitive style of rumination in the context of physical illness.
沉思的认知风格扩展了现有的疾病情绪反应认知模型。在缺乏特定测量工具的情况下,我们开发了疾病中的多维沉思量表(MRIS)。在研究1中,对最初的60个项目池进行了测试,随后在研究2中对因子结构进行了确认。在研究1中,参与者(n = 185)完成了MRIS的试点版本,然后在研究2中(n = 163)对简化后的41个项目模型进行了测试。研究1:对简化后的32个项目量表进行探索性因子分析,结果表明MRIS最初有一个四因子解决方案(侵入、沉思、工具性、可预防性),具有令人满意的内部一致性,且因子结构在不同性别间稳定。研究2:量表修订后,验证性因子分析证实了三因子MRIS结构的充分性,并且MRIS显示出良好的内部一致性、重测信度、同时效度和区分效度。MRIS在当前样本中表现出良好的心理测量特性,为身体疾病背景下的沉思认知风格提供了全面评估。