Suppr超能文献

2009 年至 2010 年美国成年 2 型糖尿病患者心血管风险因素控制趋势:按现患心血管疾病状况的比较。

Trends in control of cardiovascular risk factors among US adults with type 2 diabetes from 1999 to 2010: comparison by prevalent cardiovascular disease status.

机构信息

Heart Disease Prevention Program, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2013 Nov;10(6):505-13. doi: 10.1177/1479164113496828. Epub 2013 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) suffer from cardiovascular disease (CVD). Whether CVD risk factors have improved in those with DM with and without CVD is not established. We compared risk factor levels and goal attainment in US adults with diabetes with and without CVD.

METHODS

We examined 2403 adults (aged ≥ 18 years) in the United States with T2DM (n = 654, 27% with CVD) across 1999-2010 using the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and evaluated control of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), blood pressure (BP), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and body mass index (BMI) in those with DM with versus without CVD.

RESULTS

The proportions controlled for HbA1c, BP and LDL-C have improved (p < 0.001) overall between 1999 and 2010, but only 24% were at goal for all three factors in 2009-2010. There were improvements in BP, triglycerides and LDL-C in those with CVD, and in those without CVD, there were also improvements in control of all parameters, although changes in mean levels of risk factors were less impressive.

CONCLUSION

Despite modest improvement over time, in most CVD risk factors, only one-fourth of those with T2DM are at goal for HbA1c, BP and LDL-C, with improvements seen in those without CVD more often than those with CVD.

摘要

背景

大多数 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者患有心血管疾病(CVD)。患有和不患有 CVD 的糖尿病患者的 CVD 风险因素是否有所改善尚不清楚。我们比较了美国患有和不患有 CVD 的糖尿病患者的危险因素水平和目标达标情况。

方法

我们使用美国国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)检查了美国 1999-2010 年间 2403 名年龄≥18 岁的 T2DM 成年人(n=654,27%患有 CVD),并评估了患有和不患有 CVD 的糖尿病患者的血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)、血压(BP)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和体重指数(BMI)的控制情况。

结果

总体而言,HbA1c、BP 和 LDL-C 的控制比例在 1999 年至 2010 年间有所改善(p<0.001),但在 2009-2010 年仅 24%的患者达到了所有三个因素的目标。CVD 患者的 BP、甘油三酯和 LDL-C 有所改善,而无 CVD 的患者的所有参数控制也有所改善,尽管危险因素的平均水平变化不太明显。

结论

尽管随着时间的推移有所改善,但在大多数 CVD 风险因素中,只有四分之一的 T2DM 患者达到了 HbA1c、BP 和 LDL-C 的目标,并且在没有 CVD 的患者中,改善情况比有 CVD 的患者更为常见。

相似文献

7

引用本文的文献

3
Challenges in the Prevention and Management of Diabetic Kidney Diseases.糖尿病肾病预防与管理中的挑战
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2021 Aug 23;2:728320. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2021.728320. eCollection 2021.
10

本文引用的文献

4
Impact of weight gain on outcomes in type 2 diabetes.体重增加对 2 型糖尿病结局的影响。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jul;27(7):1431-8. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2011.585396. Epub 2011 May 23.
6
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2010.《糖尿病医疗护理标准——2010》
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jan;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S11-61. doi: 10.2337/dc10-S011.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验