Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Arctic Ecology Department, The Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 20;8(8):e71912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071912. eCollection 2013.
This paper presents results from a multidisciplinary study of a negotiation process between farmers and wildlife authorities which led to an agricultural subsidy scheme to alleviate conflicts between agriculture and geese in Norway. The Svalbard-breeding population of pink-footed geese Anser brachyrhynchus has increased considerably over the last decades and conflicts with farmers have escalated, especially at stopover sites in spring when geese feed on newly sprouted pasture grass. In Vesterålen, an important stopover site for geese in North Norway, farmers deployed scaring of geese at varying intensity dependent on the level of conflict during 1988-2012. We assessed the efficiency of a subsidy scheme established in 2006, in terms of its conflict mitigation, reflected in a near discontinuation of scaring activities. The presence of pink-footed geese was analysed in relation to scaring intensity, the total goose population size and the increasing occurrence of another goose species, the barnacle goose Branta leucopsis. Scaring significantly affected the number of geese staging in Vesterålen, both in absolute and relative terms (controlling for total population size). The geese responded immediately to an increased, and reduced, level of scaring. Despite the establishment of the subsidy scheme, the number of pink-footed geese has recently declined which is probably caused by the increasing number of barnacle geese. For the farmers, the subsidy scheme provides funding that reduces the economic costs caused by the geese. Sustaining a low level of conflict will require close monitoring, dialogue and adaptation of the subsidy scheme to cater for changes in goose population dynamics.
本文介绍了一项多学科研究的结果,该研究涉及农民和野生动物管理部门之间的谈判过程,该过程导致了一项农业补贴计划的出台,以缓解挪威农业和鹅之间的冲突。过去几十年里,斯瓦尔巴德繁殖的粉脚鹅(Anser brachyrhynchus)数量大幅增加,与农民的冲突也愈演愈烈,尤其是在春季鹅觅食新长出的牧草的停歇地。在挪威北部的重要停歇地——韦斯特龙,农民在 1988-2012 年期间根据冲突程度的不同,采用了不同强度的驱赶鹅的措施。我们评估了 2006 年设立的补贴计划的效率,该计划通过减少驱赶活动来缓解冲突。粉脚鹅的存在与驱赶强度、鹅的总数量以及另一种鹅——斑嘴鸭(Branta leucopsis)的出现频率有关。驱赶行为显著影响了在韦斯特龙停歇的鹅的数量,无论是绝对数量还是相对数量(控制总种群数量)。鹅对驱赶强度的增加和减少都做出了立即反应。尽管设立了补贴计划,但最近粉脚鹅的数量有所下降,这可能是由于斑嘴鸭数量的增加所致。对于农民来说,补贴计划提供了资金,减少了鹅带来的经济成本。要维持低水平的冲突,需要密切监测、对话和调整补贴计划,以适应鹅种群动态的变化。