Eythórsson Einar, Tombre Ingunn M, Madsen Jesper
High North Department, Fram Centre, Norwegian Institute for Cultural Heritage Research (NIKU), P.O. Box 6606, Langnes, 9296, Tromsø, Norway.
Department of Arctic Ecology, The Fram Centre, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), P.O. Box 6606, Langnes, 9296, Tromsø, Norway.
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):231-240. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0884-4.
In 2012, the four countries hosting the Svalbard population of pink-footed goose Anser brachyrhynchus along its flyway launched an International Species Management Plan for the population. One of the aims was to reduce conflicts between geese and agriculture to an acceptable level. Since 2006, Norway has offered subsidies to farmers that provide refuge areas for geese on their land. We evaluate the mid-Norwegian goose management subsidy scheme, with a view to its adjustment to prevailing ecological and socio-economic parameters. The analysis indicates that the legitimacy of the scheme is highly dependent on transparency of knowledge management and accountability of management scheme to the farming community. Among farmers, as well as front-line officials, outcomes of prioritisation processes within the scheme are judged unfair when there is an evident mismatch between payments and genuine damage. We suggest how the scheme can be made more fair and responsive to ecological changes, within a framework of adaptive management.
2012年,在斯瓦尔巴群岛粉脚雁(Anser brachyrhynchus)迁徙路线上的四个国家,针对该种群发起了一项国际物种管理计划。其目标之一是将大雁与农业之间的冲突减少到可接受的水平。自2006年以来,挪威一直向那些在其土地上为大雁提供避难所的农民提供补贴。我们评估了挪威中部的大雁管理补贴计划,以期使其适应当前的生态和社会经济参数。分析表明,该计划的合法性高度依赖于知识管理的透明度以及管理计划对农业社区的问责制。在农民以及一线官员中,如果补贴与实际损失之间存在明显不匹配,那么该计划内优先排序过程的结果就会被判定为不公平。我们建议在适应性管理框架内,如何使该计划更加公平并对生态变化做出响应。