Simonsen Caroline E, Tombre Ingunn M, Madsen Jesper
Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Kalø, Grenåvej 14, 8410, Rønde, Denmark.
Department of Arctic Ecology, The Fram Centre, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, P.O. Box 6606, 9296, Tromsø, Norway.
Ambio. 2017 Mar;46(Suppl 2):319-327. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0891-5.
Expanding populations of farmland foraging geese are causing escalating conflict with agriculture. We used questionnaires to investigate farmers´ perceptions in mid-Norway of spring staging geese and the extent to which they attempt to reduce pasture damage by goose scaring. We predicted farmers' scaring effort (a measure of dissatisfaction) to increase on fields closer to goose roosting sites where goose grazing intensity was highest (measured by dropping counts). Results showed no such relationship, suggesting that farmers' perception of goose use was not linked to actual goose use, but influenced by sociological factors and individual opinion. These results confirm the need to distribute subsidies/compensation to affected farmers based upon quantifiable measures of goose use rather than complaint levels. To avoid further conflict escalation, it is equally important that managers are aware of farmers´ perceptions and their causes, to effectively target communication about policies and measures to mitigate goose-agriculture problems.
农田觅食鹅种群数量的不断增加正导致与农业的冲突不断升级。我们通过问卷调查来调查挪威中部农民对春季停歇鹅的看法,以及他们通过驱赶鹅来减少牧场损害的程度。我们预测,在距离鹅栖息地点较近、鹅放牧强度最高(通过粪便计数衡量)的田地上,农民的驱赶力度(一种不满程度的衡量指标)会增加。结果并未显示出这种关系,这表明农民对鹅活动情况的认知与实际鹅的活动情况并无关联,而是受到社会因素和个人观点的影响。这些结果证实了有必要根据鹅活动情况的可量化指标而非投诉水平向受影响农民发放补贴/补偿。为避免冲突进一步升级,同样重要的是,管理者要了解农民的看法及其成因,以便有效地针对缓解鹅与农业问题的政策和措施进行沟通。