• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我选择,所以我喜欢:任意选择引起的面孔偏好。

I choose, therefore I like: preference for faces induced by arbitrary choice.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Keio University, Mita, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Aug 16;8(8):e72071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072071. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0072071
PMID:23977211
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3745416/
Abstract

Behavioral choice alters one's preference rather than simply reflecting it. This effect to fit preferences with past choice, is known as "choice-induced preference change." After making a choice between two equally attractive options, one tends to rate the chosen option better than they initially did and/or the unchosen option worse. The present study examined how behavioral choice changes subsequent preference, using facial images for the choice options as well as blind choice techniques. Participants rated their facial preference for each face, and chose between two equally preferred faces and subsequently rated their facial preference. Results from four experiments demonstrated that randomly chosen faces were more preferred only after participants were required to choose "a preferred face," (in Experiment 1) but not "an unpreferred face," (in Experiment 2) or "a rounder face" (in Experiment 3). Further, preference change was still observed after participants were informed that choices were actually random (in Experiment 4). Our findings provide new and important implications characterizing the conditions under which random choice changes preference, and show that people are tempted to make a biased evaluation even after they know that they did not make the choice for themselves.

摘要

行为选择改变了一个人的偏好,而不仅仅是反映它。这种适应过去选择的偏好的效应被称为“选择诱导偏好改变”。在两个同样吸引人的选项之间做出选择后,人们往往会对所选选项的评价高于最初的评价,并且/或者对未选选项的评价更差。本研究使用面部图像作为选择选项以及盲目选择技术,考察了行为选择如何改变后续偏好。参与者对每张脸的面部偏好进行了评分,并在两个同样受欢迎的面孔之间进行了选择,然后对他们的面部偏好进行了评分。四项实验的结果表明,只有在参与者被要求选择“更喜欢的脸”时(实验 1),而不是“不那么喜欢的脸”(实验 2)或“更圆的脸”(实验 3),随机选择的面孔才会更受欢迎。此外,即使参与者被告知选择实际上是随机的(实验 4),偏好变化仍然存在。我们的研究结果提供了新的和重要的启示,说明了随机选择改变偏好的条件,并表明即使人们知道自己不是为自己做出的选择,他们也会倾向于做出有偏见的评价。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca39/3745416/4c47ae1e2b5d/pone.0072071.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca39/3745416/1f3df4b715dc/pone.0072071.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca39/3745416/399d88617fab/pone.0072071.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca39/3745416/b428c314b21d/pone.0072071.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca39/3745416/4c47ae1e2b5d/pone.0072071.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca39/3745416/1f3df4b715dc/pone.0072071.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca39/3745416/399d88617fab/pone.0072071.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca39/3745416/b428c314b21d/pone.0072071.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca39/3745416/4c47ae1e2b5d/pone.0072071.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
I choose, therefore I like: preference for faces induced by arbitrary choice.我选择,所以我喜欢:任意选择引起的面孔偏好。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 16;8(8):e72071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072071. eCollection 2013.
2
Assessment of health in human faces is context-dependent.对面部健康的评估取决于具体情境。
Behav Processes. 2016 Apr;125:89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
3
Manipulation detection and preference alterations in a choice blindness paradigm.选择盲视范式中的操控检测与偏好改变
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 23;9(9):e108515. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108515. eCollection 2014.
4
Choosing what we like vs liking what we choose: How choice-induced preference change might actually be instrumental to decision-making.选择我们喜欢的与喜欢我们选择的:选择诱发偏好改变如何真正对决策起到工具性作用。
PLoS One. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0231081. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231081. eCollection 2020.
5
Preference for facial self-resemblance and attractiveness in human mate choice.人类择偶中对面部相似性和吸引力的偏好。
Arch Sex Behav. 2011 Dec;40(6):1263-70. doi: 10.1007/s10508-010-9723-z. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
6
Preference for attractive faces in human infants extends beyond conspecifics.人类婴儿对有吸引力面孔的偏好并不局限于同种个体。
Dev Sci. 2008 Jan;11(1):76-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00647.x.
7
When Not Choosing Leads to Not Liking: Choice-Induced Preference in Infancy.当不做选择导致不喜欢时:婴儿期的选择诱导偏好。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Nov;31(11):1422-1429. doi: 10.1177/0956797620954491. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
8
Distinct neural correlates of the preference-related valuation of supraliminally and subliminally presented faces.阈上和阈下呈现面孔的偏好相关评估的不同神经关联。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Aug;36(8):2865-77. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22813. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
9
Happy faces are preferred regardless of familiarity--sad faces are preferred only when familiar.无论熟悉与否,人们更喜欢开心的面孔——只有在熟悉的情况下,人们才更喜欢悲伤的面孔。
Emotion. 2013 Jun;13(3):391-6. doi: 10.1037/a0030861. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
10
Infant's visual preferences for facial traits associated with adult attractiveness judgements: data from eye-tracking.婴儿对与成人吸引力判断相关面部特征的视觉偏好:来自眼动追踪的数据
Infant Behav Dev. 2014 Aug;37(3):268-75. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Original art paintings are chosen over their "color-rotated" versions because of changed color contrast.由于颜色对比度发生了变化,原始艺术画作比其“颜色旋转”版本更受青睐。
Perception. 2025 Oct;54(10):780-814. doi: 10.1177/03010066251345994. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Does Cohort Selection Affect Machine Learning from Clinical Data?队列选择会影响基于临床数据的机器学习吗?
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:473-482. eCollection 2024.
3
The more random people's preference judgments are, the more they explore in gambling tasks.人们的偏好判断越随机,他们在赌博任务中探索得就越多。

本文引用的文献

1
Is choice-induced preference change long lasting?选择诱导偏好改变是否持久?
Psychol Sci. 2012 Oct 1;23(10):1123-1129. doi: 10.1177/0956797612438733. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
2
When flexibility is stable: implicit long-term shaping of olfactory preferences.当灵活性稳定时:嗅觉偏好的隐性长期塑造。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e37857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037857. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
3
Does ignoring lead to worse evaluations? A new explanation of the stimulus devaluation effect.忽视会导致更糟糕的评价吗?刺激贬值效应的新解释。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Dec 20;12(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02252-0.
4
Does choice change preferences? An incentivized test of the mere choice effect.选择会改变偏好吗?对单纯选择效应的一项激励测试。
Exp Econ. 2023;26(3):499-521. doi: 10.1007/s10683-021-09728-5. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
5
The value of confidence: Confidence prediction errors drive value-based learning in the absence of external feedback.信心的价值:在缺乏外部反馈的情况下,信心预测误差驱动基于价值的学习。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Oct 3;18(10):e1010580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010580. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
What Bias Management Can Learn From Change Management? Utilizing Change Framework to Review and Explore Bias Strategies.偏见管理能从变革管理中学到什么?利用变革框架来审视和探索偏见应对策略。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 15;12:644145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.644145. eCollection 2021.
7
Computational modeling of choice-induced preference change: A Reinforcement-Learning-based approach.基于强化学习的选择诱导偏好变化的计算建模。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):e0244434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244434. eCollection 2021.
8
Sour grapes and sweet victories: How actions shape preferences.酸葡萄与甜胜利:行动如何塑造偏好。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jan 7;15(1):e1006499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006499. eCollection 2019 Jan.
9
Why is the environment important for decision making? Local reservoir model for choice-based learning.为什么环境对决策很重要?基于选择的学习的局部水库模型。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 4;13(10):e0205161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205161. eCollection 2018.
10
Relation between choice-induced preference change and depression.选择诱导的偏好改变与抑郁之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 29;12(6):e0180041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180041. eCollection 2017.
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(2):193-208. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.570313. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
4
Liking is not the opposite of disliking: the functional separability of positive and negative attitudes toward minority groups.喜欢不是不喜欢的对立面:对少数群体的积极和消极态度的功能可分离性。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2011 Apr;17(2):134-43. doi: 10.1037/a0023806.
5
Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research.面部吸引力:基于进化的研究。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 12;366(1571):1638-59. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0404.
6
Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change.认知失调和选择诱发偏好改变的神经相关物。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Dec 21;107(51):22014-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011879108. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
7
Do decisions shape preference? Evidence from blind choice.决策会塑造偏好吗?来自盲目选择的证据。
Psychol Sci. 2010 Sep;21(9):1231-5. doi: 10.1177/0956797610379235. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
8
How choice affects and reflects preferences: revisiting the free-choice paradigm.选择如何影响和反映偏好:重新审视自由选择范式。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):573-94. doi: 10.1037/a0020217.
9
The neural basis of rationalization: cognitive dissonance reduction during decision-making.合理化的神经基础:决策过程中的认知失调减少。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011 Sep;6(4):460-7. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq054. Epub 2010 Jul 9.
10
Experience and choice shape expected aversive outcomes.经验和选择塑造了预期的厌恶性结果。
J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 7;30(27):9209-15. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4770-09.2010.