Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul 1;49(7):1137-1148. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004951.
Two previously published trials (ARDS et Curarisation Systematique [ACURASYS] and Reevaluation of Systemic Early Neuromuscular Blockade [ROSE]) presented equivocal evidence on the effect of neuromuscular blocking agent infusions in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (acute respiratory distress syndrome). The sedation regimen differed between these trials and also within the ROSE trial between treatment and control groups. We hypothesized that the proportion of deeper sedation is a mediator of the effect of neuromuscular blocking agent infusions on mortality.
Retrospective cohort study.
Seven ICUs in an academic hospital network, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA).
Intubated and mechanically ventilated ICU patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (Berlin definition) admitted between January 2008 until June 2019.
None.
The proportion of deeper sedation was defined as days with nonlight sedation as a fraction of mechanical ventilation days in the ICU after acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis. Using clinical data obtained from a hospital network registry, 3,419 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were included, of whom 577 (16.9%) were treated with neuromuscular blocking agent infusions, for a mean (sd) duration of 1.8 (±1.9) days. The duration of deeper sedation was prolonged in patients receiving neuromuscular blocking agent infusions (4.6 ± 2.2 d) compared with patients without neuromuscular blocking agent infusions (2.4 ± 2.2 d; p < 0.001). The proportion of deeper sedation completely mediated the negative effect of neuromuscular blocking agent infusions on in-hospital mortality (p < 0.001). Exploratory analysis in patients who received deeper sedation revealed a beneficial effect of neuromuscular blocking agent infusions on mortality (49% vs 51%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.63-0.99, adjusted absolute risk difference, -0.05; p = 0.048).
In acute respiratory distress syndrome patients who receive neuromuscular blocking agent infusions, a prolonged, high proportion of deeper sedation is associated with increased mortality. Our data support the view that clinicians should minimize the duration of deeper sedation after recovery from neuromuscular blocking agent infusion.
两项先前发表的试验(ARDS et Curarisation Systematique [ACURASYS] 和 Reevaluation of Systemic Early Neuromuscular Blockade [ROSE])对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(acute respiratory distress syndrome)患者使用神经肌肉阻滞剂输注的效果提供了相互矛盾的证据。这些试验之间以及 ROSE 试验中的治疗组和对照组之间的镇静方案也存在差异。我们假设,深度镇静的比例是神经肌肉阻滞剂输注对死亡率影响的中介因素。
回顾性队列研究。
贝丝以色列女执事医疗中心(波士顿,马萨诸塞州)的一个学术医院网络中的 7 个 ICU。
2008 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间,柏林定义的急性呼吸窘迫综合征的气管插管和机械通气 ICU 患者。
无。
深度镇静的比例定义为急性呼吸窘迫综合征诊断后 ICU 机械通气天数中非轻度镇静的天数占比。使用从医院网络注册处获得的临床数据,共纳入 3419 名急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者,其中 577 名(16.9%)接受了神经肌肉阻滞剂输注,平均(标准差)持续时间为 1.8(±1.9)天。与未接受神经肌肉阻滞剂输注的患者相比,接受神经肌肉阻滞剂输注的患者的深度镇静持续时间延长(4.6 ± 2.2 d 比 2.4 ± 2.2 d;p < 0.001)。深度镇静的比例完全介导了神经肌肉阻滞剂输注对住院死亡率的负面影响(p < 0.001)。在接受深度镇静的患者中进行的探索性分析显示,神经肌肉阻滞剂输注对死亡率有有益影响(49%比 51%;调整后的优势比,0.80;95%置信区间,0.63-0.99,调整后的绝对风险差异,-0.05;p = 0.048)。
在接受神经肌肉阻滞剂输注的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中,长时间、高比例的深度镇静与死亡率增加相关。我们的数据支持这样一种观点,即临床医生应在从神经肌肉阻滞剂输注中恢复后尽量减少深度镇静的持续时间。