• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚残疾妇女和男子的社会经济不平等的时间趋势:不平等持续存在的证据。

Time trends in socio-economic inequalities for women and men with disabilities in Australia: evidence of persisting inequalities.

机构信息

Melbourne School of Population Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 3, 207 Bouverie St, 3010 Parkville, Vic, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2013 Aug 29;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-73.

DOI:10.1186/1475-9276-12-73
PMID:23985044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3766649/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The socio-economic circumstances and health of people with disabilities has been relatively ignored in public health research, policy and practice in Australia and internationally. This is despite emerging evidence that the socio-economic circumstances that people with disabilities live in contributes to their poorer health. Compared to other developed countries, Australians with disabilities are more likely to live in disadvantaged circumstances, despite being an economically prosperous country; it is therefore likely that the socio-economic disadvantage experienced by Australians with disabilities makes a significant contribution to their health. Despite the importance of this issue Australia does not routinely monitor the socio-economic inequalities for people with disabilities. This paper addresses this gap by describing time trends in socio-economic conditions for Australians with and without disabilities according to the severity of the disability and sex.

METHODS

Cross-sectional analyses of the Australian Bureau of Statistics Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers were carried out at three time points (1998, 2003 and 2009) to estimate the proportions of women and men (aged between 25 and 64 years) who were living on low incomes, had not completed year 12, were not in paid work, living in private rental and experiencing multiple disadvantage (three or more of the indicators).

RESULTS

People with disabilities are less likely to have completed year 12, be in paid work and are more likely to be living on low incomes and experiencing multiple disadvantage. These conditions worsened with increasing severity of disability and increased or persisted over time, with most of the increase between 1998 and 2003. While women with milder disabilities tended to fare worse than men, the proportions were similar for those with moderate and severe/profound disabilities.

CONCLUSION

People with disabilities experience high levels of socio-economic disadvantage which has increased or persisted over time and these are likely to translate into poorer health outcomes. A large proportion experience multiple forms of disadvantage, reinforcing the need to tackle disadvantage in a coordinated way across sectors.People with disabilities should be a priority population group for public health. Monitoring socio-economic conditions of people with disabilities is critical for informing policy and assessing the impact of disability reforms.

摘要

简介

在澳大利亚和国际上,残疾人的社会经济状况和健康在公共卫生研究、政策和实践中相对被忽视。尽管越来越多的证据表明,残疾人所生活的社会经济环境对他们的健康状况产生了不利影响。与其他发达国家相比,澳大利亚的残疾人更有可能生活在不利的环境中,尽管澳大利亚是一个经济繁荣的国家;因此,澳大利亚残疾人所经历的社会经济劣势很可能对他们的健康状况产生重大影响。尽管这个问题很重要,但澳大利亚并没有定期监测残疾人的社会经济不平等情况。本文通过描述根据残疾严重程度和性别,澳大利亚残疾人和非残疾人的社会经济状况的时间趋势来填补这一空白。

方法

在三个时间点(1998 年、2003 年和 2009 年),对澳大利亚统计局残疾、老龄化和照顾者调查进行了横断面分析,以估计处于 25 至 64 岁年龄段的女性和男性中,有多少人生活在低收入水平、未完成 12 年级学业、没有从事有报酬的工作、居住在私人出租房中和经历多种劣势(三个或更多指标)的比例。

结果

残疾人更有可能未完成 12 年级学业、没有从事有报酬的工作,并且更有可能生活在低收入水平并经历多种劣势。这些情况随着残疾程度的加重而恶化,并随着时间的推移而增加或持续存在,其中大部分增加发生在 1998 年至 2003 年之间。虽然轻度残疾的女性往往比男性更糟糕,但对于中度和重度/极重度残疾的女性来说,情况大致相同。

结论

残疾人经历着高水平的社会经济劣势,这种劣势随着时间的推移而增加或持续存在,这很可能转化为更差的健康结果。很大一部分人经历多种形式的劣势,这就需要在跨部门协调一致地解决劣势问题。残疾人应该成为公共卫生的优先人群。监测残疾人的社会经济状况对于为政策提供信息和评估残疾改革的影响至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1569/3766649/21a844fb775e/1475-9276-12-73-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1569/3766649/da3a18b0262c/1475-9276-12-73-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1569/3766649/c13000e697af/1475-9276-12-73-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1569/3766649/21a844fb775e/1475-9276-12-73-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1569/3766649/da3a18b0262c/1475-9276-12-73-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1569/3766649/c13000e697af/1475-9276-12-73-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1569/3766649/21a844fb775e/1475-9276-12-73-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Time trends in socio-economic inequalities for women and men with disabilities in Australia: evidence of persisting inequalities.澳大利亚残疾妇女和男子的社会经济不平等的时间趋势:不平等持续存在的证据。
Int J Equity Health. 2013 Aug 29;12:73. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-12-73.
2
Inequalities in socio-economic characteristics and health and wellbeing of men with and without disabilities: a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline wave of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Male Health.残疾男性与非残疾男性在社会经济特征、健康及幸福方面的不平等:对澳大利亚男性健康纵向研究基线波次的横断面分析
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 31;16(Suppl 3):1042. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3700-y.
3
Intersections between disability, type of impairment, gender and socio-economic disadvantage in a nationally representative sample of 33,101 working-aged Australians.在一个包含33101名澳大利亚工作年龄人群的全国代表性样本中,残疾、损伤类型、性别与社会经济劣势之间的交叉情况。
Disabil Health J. 2015 Apr;8(2):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
4
Inequalities in social capital and health between people with and without disabilities.残疾人和非残疾人在社会资本与健康方面的不平等。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Feb;126:26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.12.009. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
5
Prevalence of disability among the major cities in Australia 2012 with geographical representation of distribution in Western Australia.澳大利亚主要城市残疾患病率 2012 年,西澳大利亚州分布的地理代表性。
Health Promot J Austr. 2020 Jan;31(1):121-127. doi: 10.1002/hpja.265. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
6
Disability-based discrimination and health: findings from an Australian-based population study.基于残疾的歧视与健康:一项澳大利亚人群研究的结果。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018 Apr;42(2):172-174. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12735. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
7
Discrimination and avoidance due to disability in Australia: evidence from a National Cross Sectional Survey.澳大利亚的残疾歧视与回避:来自全国横断面调查的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 5;18(1):1347. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6234-7.
8
Cancer survival disparities worsening by socio-economic disadvantage over the last 3 decades in new South Wales, Australia.在过去三十年中,澳大利亚新南威尔士州因社会经济劣势导致的癌症生存差距不断恶化。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 14;17(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4692-y.
9
Disability in two health care systems: access, quality, satisfaction, and physician contacts among working-age Canadians and Americans with disabilities.两种医疗保健系统中的残疾状况:有残疾的加拿大和美国工作年龄人群在获得医疗服务、医疗质量、满意度和医生接触方面的情况。
Disabil Health J. 2008 Oct;1(4):196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.07.006.
10
Disability-related inequalities in the prevalence of loneliness across the lifespan: trends from Australia, 2003 to 2020.残疾相关的孤独感在整个生命周期中的患病率不平等:来自澳大利亚 2003 年至 2020 年的趋势。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 27;24(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17936-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Preliminary Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Perceptions on the Implementation of UN CRPD Principles Concerning Social Inclusion and Participation of Persons with Disabilities in Municipalities.一份关于评估对联合国《残疾人权利公约》中有关残疾人在市政当局的社会包容和参与原则实施情况看法的问卷的编制与初步验证
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2025 Jan 16;21:e17450179360265. doi: 10.2174/0117450179360265250113081501. eCollection 2025.
2
How does the subjective well-being of Australian adults with a congenital corpus callosum disorder compare with that of the general Australian population?澳大利亚胼胝体发育不全症患者的主观幸福感与澳大利亚一般人群相比如何?
Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):3161-3172. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03741-w. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Housing affordability and mental health: does the relationship differ for renters and home purchasers?住房负担能力与心理健康:租房者和购房者的关系是否不同?
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct;94:91-7. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.023. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
2
Lower well-being of young Australian adults with self-reported disability reflects their poorer living conditions rather than health issues.自报残疾的澳大利亚年轻成年人福祉水平较低,反映出他们较差的生活条件,而非健康问题。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2012 Apr;36(2):176-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2011.00810.x. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
3
Understanding how race/ethnicity and gender define age-trajectories of disability: an intersectionality approach.
Use of Parental Disability Trajectories to Identify Adolescents Who are Young Carers.利用父母残疾轨迹识别青少年护老者。
J Youth Adolesc. 2023 Feb;52(2):449-460. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01627-z. Epub 2022 May 20.
4
Volunteer peer support frameworks supporting older women living alone.支持独居老年女性的志愿者同伴支持框架。
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Nov;30(6):e4252-e4263. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13818. Epub 2022 May 6.
5
On the outside looking in: a phenomenological study of the lived experience of Australian adults with a disorder of the corpus callosum.从外部观察:对澳大利亚患有胼胝体疾病的成年人的生活体验的现象学研究。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Dec 14;16(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-02140-5.
6
Navigating Complexity in a Global Pandemic: The Effects of COVID-19 on Children and Young People with Disability and Their Families in Australia.应对全球大流行中的复杂性:新冠疫情对澳大利亚残疾儿童和青少年及其家庭的影响
Public Adm Rev. 2021 Nov-Dec;81(6):1192-1196. doi: 10.1111/puar.13352. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
7
Flexibility in individual funding schemes: How well did Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme support remote learning for students with disability during COVID-19?个人资助计划的灵活性:澳大利亚国家残疾保险计划在新冠疫情期间对残疾学生远程学习的支持效果如何?
Soc Policy Adm. 2021 Sep;55(5):906-920. doi: 10.1111/spol.12670. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
8
Area-Level Associations between Built Environment Characteristics and Disability Prevalence in Australia: An Ecological Analysis.澳大利亚建成环境特征与残疾流行率的区域水平关联:生态分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 26;17(21):7844. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217844.
9
The Relative Risk of Homelessness among Persons with a Disability: New Methods and Policy Insights.残疾人士无家可归的相对风险:新方法和政策见解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 6;16(22):4304. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224304.
10
The cumulative effect of living with disability on mental health in working-age adults: an analysis using marginal structural models.残疾对工作年龄成年人心理健康的累积影响:使用边缘结构模型的分析。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Mar;55(3):309-318. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01688-9. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
理解种族/民族和性别如何定义残疾的年龄轨迹:一种交叉性方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Apr;72(8):1236-48. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.034. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
4
The health of disabled people and the social determinants of health.残疾人的健康与健康的社会决定因素。
Public Health. 2011 Mar;125(3):145-7. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.11.003.
5
Poverty transitions among families supporting a child with intellectual disability.抚养智障儿童家庭中的贫困状况转变
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010 Dec;35(4):224-34. doi: 10.3109/13668250.2010.518562.