• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者合并症与肾移植评估。

Comorbidities and kidney transplant evaluation in the elderly.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.

出版信息

Am J Nephrol. 2013;38(3):204-11. doi: 10.1159/000354483. Epub 2013 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1159/000354483
PMID:23988670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4401035/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The elderly are the fastest growing subpopulation with end-stage renal disease. The goal of our study was to define characteristics of elderly patients who were considered ineligible for transplantation compared to those who were listed.

METHODS

984 patients were referred for evaluation during a 2-year period. Records of patients ≥65 years of age (n = 123) were reviewed. Patients who were listed versus not listed were characterized. Factors associated with waitlisting were determined using standard statistical tools.

RESULTS

Half of elderly transplant candidates were accepted for listing compared to 75.4% of those aged <65 years. In multivariable logistic regression, older age (OR 1.29 per year ≥65, 95% CI 1.14-1.45), coronary artery disease (OR 8.57, 95% CI 2.41-30.53), and poor mobility (OR 13.97, 95% CI 4.76-41.00) were independently associated with denial of listing. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed good discrimination for denial of listing (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88).

CONCLUSION

Elderly candidates carry a heavy burden of comorbidities and over half of those evaluated are deemed unsuitable for waitlisting. Better delineation of characteristics associated with suitability for transplant candidacy in the elderly is warranted to facilitate appropriate referrals by physicians and management of expectations in potential candidates.

摘要

背景/目的:老年人是终末期肾病患者中增长最快的亚群。我们的研究目的是确定与被列入名单的患者相比,不适合接受移植的老年患者的特征。

方法

在两年期间,有 984 名患者被转介进行评估。回顾了年龄≥65 岁的患者(n=123)的记录。对列入名单和未列入名单的患者进行了特征描述。使用标准统计工具确定与列入名单相关的因素。

结果

与<65 岁的患者相比,一半的老年移植候选者被接受列入名单,而 75.4%的患者被接受列入名单。在多变量逻辑回归中,年龄较大(≥65 岁每年的 OR 为 1.29,95%CI 为 1.14-1.45)、冠状动脉疾病(OR 为 8.57,95%CI 为 2.41-30.53)和行动不便(OR 为 13.97,95%CI 为 4.76-41.00)与列入名单的拒绝独立相关。接受者操作特征曲线显示,拒绝列入名单的区分度良好(接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.88)。

结论

老年患者伴有多种合并症,评估的患者中有一半以上被认为不适合列入等候名单。需要更好地确定与老年患者适合移植候选资格相关的特征,以便医生进行适当的转介,并管理潜在候选人的期望。

相似文献

1
Comorbidities and kidney transplant evaluation in the elderly.老年患者合并症与肾移植评估。
Am J Nephrol. 2013;38(3):204-11. doi: 10.1159/000354483. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
2
Non-invasive cardiac stress studies may not offer significant benefit in pre-kidney transplant evaluation: A retrospective cohort study.非侵入性心脏应激研究在肾移植前评估中可能没有显著获益:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 28;15(10):e0240912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240912. eCollection 2020.
3
Rapid access to renal transplant waiting list in children: impact of patient and centre characteristics in France.法国儿童快速进入肾移植等待名单:患者及中心特征的影响
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014 Oct;29(10):1973-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu220. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
4
Screening for Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease in Waitlisted Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Cost-Utility Analysis.无症状性冠状动脉疾病在等待肾移植候选人中的筛查:成本-效用分析。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 May;75(5):693-704. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
5
Obesity and gender-biased access to deceased donor kidney transplantation.肥胖与性别偏见对接受已故供体肾移植的影响。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020 Jan 1;35(1):184-189. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz100.
6
Preemptive renal transplant candidate survival, access to care, and renal function at listing.预先确定的肾移植候选者的生存、获得医疗服务的机会和入选时的肾功能。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Aug;27(8):3321-9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs012. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
7
Prevalence and outcomes of multiple-listing for cadaveric kidney and liver transplantation.尸体肾和肝移植重复登记的患病率及结局
Am J Transplant. 2004 Jan;4(1):94-100. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-6135.2003.00282.x.
8
Association Between Declined Offers of Deceased Donor Kidney Allograft and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Candidates.接受或拒绝已故供体肾移植与肾移植候选人结局的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e1910312. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.10312.
9
Association of Socioeconomic Status and Comorbidities with Racial Disparities during Kidney Transplant Evaluation.社会经济地位和合并症与肾移植评估中的种族差异的关联。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Jun 8;15(6):843-851. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12541019. Epub 2020 May 7.
10
Fragmented QRS on 12-Lead Electrocardiogram Is Correlated With Severe Coronary Artery Disease and Abnormal Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy Results in Renal Transplant Candidates.12导联心电图上的碎裂QRS与肾移植候选者的严重冠状动脉疾病及异常心肌灌注闪烁扫描结果相关。
Exp Clin Transplant. 2018 Dec;16(6):690-695. doi: 10.6002/ect.2017.0263. Epub 2018 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardiologist Evaluation and Approval Was the Primary Predictor of Kidney Transplant Candidacy and Transplantation Among Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.心脏病专家的评估与批准是左心室射血分数降低患者肾移植候选资格及移植的主要预测因素。
Transplant Direct. 2023 Jan 6;9(2):e1421. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001421. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Has the Department of Veterans Affairs Found a Way to Avoid Racial Disparities in the Evaluation Process for Kidney Transplantation?美国退伍军人事务部是否找到了一种方法来避免肾脏移植评估过程中的种族差异?
Transplantation. 2017 Jun;101(6):1191-1199. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001377.
3
Therapeutic alternatives and palliative care for advanced renal disease in the very elderly: a review of the literature.高龄晚期肾病的治疗选择与姑息治疗:文献综述
Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Apr;47(4):647-54. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0886-8. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
4
Current and emerging treatment options for the elderly patient with chronic kidney disease.老年慢性肾病患者当前及新出现的治疗选择
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Jan 15;9:191-9. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S39763. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
'United States Renal Data System 2011 Annual Data Report: Atlas of chronic kidney disease & end-stage renal disease in the United States.《美国肾脏数据系统2011年年报:美国慢性肾脏病与终末期肾病地图集》
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Jan;59(1 Suppl 1):A7, e1-420. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.015.
2
Optimizing renal replacement therapy in older adults: a framework for making individualized decisions.优化老年患者的肾脏替代治疗:个体化决策框架。
Kidney Int. 2012 Aug;82(3):261-9. doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.384. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
3
Psychosocial variables are associated with being wait-listed, but not with receiving a kidney transplant in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS).在透析结果和实践模式研究(DOPPS)中,社会心理变量与等待名单有关,但与接受肾移植无关。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 May;27(5):2107-13. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr568. Epub 2011 Nov 5.
4
Barriers to evaluation and wait listing for kidney transplantation.评估和等待肾移植的障碍。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Jul;6(7):1760-7. doi: 10.2215/CJN.08620910. Epub 2011 May 19.
5
Access to kidney transplantation among the elderly in the United States: a glass half full, not half empty.美国老年人的肾移植机会:半满的玻璃杯,而非半空的。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Nov;5(11):2109-14. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03490410. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
6
Low level of self-reported physical activity in ambulatory patients new to dialysis.新透析患者自我报告的身体活动水平低。
Kidney Int. 2010 Dec;78(11):1164-70. doi: 10.1038/ki.2010.312. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
7
The interplay of socioeconomic status, distance to center, and interdonor service area travel on kidney transplant access and outcomes.社会经济地位、距离中心的远近以及供体服务区之间的相互作用对肾移植的机会和结果的影响。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Dec;5(12):2276-88. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04940610. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
8
Cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality among patients starting dialysis.开始透析的患者的心血管和非心血管死亡率。
JAMA. 2009 Oct 28;302(16):1782-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1488.
9
Access to kidney transplantation among remote- and rural-dwelling patients with kidney failure in the United States.美国偏远和农村地区肾衰竭患者获得肾脏移植的情况。
JAMA. 2009 Apr 22;301(16):1681-90. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.545.
10
Physical function in older candidates for renal transplantation: an impaired population.老年肾移植候选者的身体功能:一个功能受损的群体。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Mar;4(3):588-94. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03860808. Epub 2009 Mar 4.