Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 21;8(8):e71488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071488. eCollection 2013.
Although many people naively assume that the bite of carbonation is due to tactile stimulation of the oral cavity by bubbles, it has become increasingly clear that carbonation bite comes mainly from formation of carbonic acid in the oral mucosa. In Experiment 1, we asked whether bubbles were in fact required to perceive carbonation bite. Subjects rated oral pungency from several concentrations of carbonated water both at normal atmospheric pressure (at which bubbles could form) and at 2.0 atmospheres pressure (at which bubbles did not form). Ratings of carbonation bite under the two pressure conditions were essentially identical, indicating that bubbles are not required for pungency. In Experiment 2, we created controlled streams of air bubbles around the tongue in mildly pungent CO2 solutions to determine how tactile stimulation from bubbles affects carbonation bite. Since innocuous sensations like light touch and cooling often suppress pain, we predicted that bubbles might reduce rated bite. Contrary to prediction, air bubbles flowing around the tongue significantly enhanced rated bite, without inducing perceived bite in blank (un-carbonated) solutions. Accordingly, though bubbles are clearly not required for carbonation bite, they may well modulate perceived bite. More generally, the results show that innocuous tactile stimulation can enhance chemogenic pain. Possible physiological mechanisms are discussed.
虽然许多人天真地认为碳酸化的刺痛感是由于口腔内气泡的触觉刺激引起的,但越来越明显的是,碳酸化刺痛感主要来自口腔黏膜中碳酸的形成。在实验 1 中,我们探讨了气泡是否实际上是感知碳酸刺痛感所必需的。受试者对不同浓度的碳酸水在正常大气压(在此气压下可以形成气泡)和 2.0 大气压(在此气压下不能形成气泡)下的口腔刺激性进行了评价。在两种压力条件下,碳酸化刺痛感的评价基本相同,表明气泡不是刺激性所必需的。在实验 2 中,我们在轻微刺激性的 CO2 溶液周围产生可控的气泡流,以确定气泡的触觉刺激如何影响碳酸刺痛感。由于像轻触和冷却等无害感觉常常会抑制疼痛,我们预测气泡可能会降低刺痛感的评价。与预测相反,气泡在舌头上流动显著增强了刺痛感的评价,而在无味的(未碳酸化的)溶液中并没有引起感知到的刺痛感。因此,尽管气泡对于碳酸刺痛感不是必需的,但它们可能会调节感知到的刺痛感。更一般地说,这些结果表明,无害的触觉刺激可以增强化学刺激性疼痛。讨论了可能的生理机制。