ADHD Outpatient Program (ProDAH) at the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Division, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Ramiro Barcellos, 2350 - 2201A, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-003, Brazil.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;23(6):451-9. doi: 10.1007/s00787-013-0466-y. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
Although major guidelines in the field and current diagnostic criteria clearly demand an assessment of children's attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms at school, few studies address the fundamental question of which is the best approach for clinicians to get this information from teachers. Three screening strategies for ADHD were applied to teachers of 247 third grade students. They were asked (1) an overt question about potential cases of ADHD in their classroom; (2) to complete a broad-band questionnaire assessing common child mental health problems; (3) to rate ADHD-specific symptoms in a narrow-band questionnaire. Based on the overt question, teachers identified one in five students (21.1 %) as having ADHD; 28 cases (11.3 %) were identified using standard cut-offs for the narrow-band, and 13 (5.3 %) using a standard threshold for the sub-scale of hyperactivity from the broad-band questionnaire. Agreement among strategies was low (k = 0.28). A subsample of students, clinically assessed to confirm screenings, showed modest agreement with final diagnosis. The narrow-band questionnaire had the best diagnostic performance. Multivariate analysis indicated that the presence of a comorbid externalizing disorder was the only variable associated with teachers' ascertainment of ADHD caseness or non-caseness. Choice of screening strategy significantly affects how teachers report on ADHD symptoms at school. The halo effect of externalizing behaviors impacts the correct identification of true cases of ADHD in the school setting. Clinicians can rely on narrow-band instruments like the SNAP-IV to get information on ADHD symptoms at school from teachers.
尽管该领域的主要指南和当前的诊断标准明确要求评估儿童的注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)症状在学校,但很少有研究解决临床医生从教师那里获取这些信息的最佳方法这一基本问题。我们向 247 名三年级学生的教师应用了三种 ADHD 筛查策略。他们被要求 (1) 就课堂上潜在的 ADHD 病例提出公开问题;(2) 完成一份广泛的问卷,评估常见的儿童心理健康问题;(3) 在窄带问卷中评估 ADHD 特定症状。根据公开问题,教师识别出五分之一的学生(21.1%)患有 ADHD;28 例(11.3%)使用窄带的标准截止值识别,13 例(5.3%)使用宽频问卷的多动子量表的标准阈值识别。策略之间的一致性较低(k = 0.28)。对一组学生进行临床评估以确认筛查,结果显示与最终诊断有一定的一致性。窄带问卷具有最佳的诊断性能。多变量分析表明,共患外化障碍的存在是与教师确定 ADHD 病例或非病例相关的唯一变量。筛查策略的选择显著影响教师对学校 ADHD 症状的报告方式。外化行为的晕轮效应会影响学校中 ADHD 真实病例的正确识别。临床医生可以依靠 SNAP-IV 等窄带工具从教师那里获取有关 ADHD 症状的信息。