Paradies Yin, Truong Mandy, Priest Naomi
Centre for Citizenship and Globalisation, Faculty of Arts and Education, Deakin University, Burwood Hwy, Burwood, 3125, Victoria, Australia,
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb;29(2):364-87. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2583-1. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
Although considered a key driver of racial disparities in healthcare, relatively little is known about the extent of interpersonal racism perpetrated by healthcare providers, nor is there a good understanding of how best to measure such racism.
This paper reviews worldwide evidence (from 1995 onwards) for racism among healthcare providers; as well as comparing existing measurement approaches to emerging best practice, it focuses on the assessment of interpersonal racism, rather than internalized or systemic/institutional racism.
The following databases and electronic journal collections were searched for articles published between 1995 and 2012: Medline, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Sociological Abstracts. Included studies were published empirical studies of any design measuring and/or reporting on healthcare provider racism in the English language. Data on study design and objectives; method of measurement, constructs measured, type of tool; study population and healthcare setting; country and language of study; and study outcomes were extracted from each study.
The 37 studies included in this review were almost solely conducted in the U.S. and with physicians. Statistically significant evidence of racist beliefs, emotions or practices among healthcare providers in relation to minority groups was evident in 26 of these studies. Although a number of measurement approaches were utilized, a limited range of constructs was assessed.
Despite burgeoning interest in racism as a contributor to racial disparities in healthcare, we still know little about the extent of healthcare provider racism or how best to measure it. Studies using more sophisticated approaches to assess healthcare provider racism are required to inform interventions aimed at reducing racial disparities in health.
尽管人际种族主义被认为是医疗保健领域种族差异的关键驱动因素,但对于医疗保健提供者实施的人际种族主义程度,我们知之甚少,而且对于如何最好地衡量这种种族主义也缺乏深入理解。
本文回顾了全球范围内(自1995年起)关于医疗保健提供者种族主义的证据;除了将现有的测量方法与新兴的最佳实践进行比较外,它还专注于人际种族主义的评估,而非内化的或系统性/制度性的种族主义。
检索了以下数据库和电子期刊合集,以查找1995年至2012年间发表的文章:医学索引数据库(Medline)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、心理学文摘数据库(PsycInfo)、社会学文摘数据库(Sociological Abstracts)。纳入的研究为以英文发表的、采用任何设计来测量和/或报告医疗保健提供者种族主义的实证研究。从每项研究中提取了关于研究设计和目的;测量方法、所测量的结构、工具类型;研究人群和医疗保健环境;研究国家和语言;以及研究结果的数据。
本综述纳入的37项研究几乎均在美国进行,且研究对象为医生。其中26项研究中有统计学意义的证据表明,医疗保健提供者对少数群体存在种族主义信念、情感或行为。尽管使用了多种测量方法,但所评估的结构范围有限。
尽管人们对种族主义作为医疗保健领域种族差异的一个因素的兴趣日益浓厚,但我们对医疗保健提供者种族主义的程度或如何最好地衡量它仍然知之甚少。需要采用更复杂方法来评估医疗保健提供者种族主义的研究,以为旨在减少健康方面种族差异的干预措施提供信息。