Lozer Diego M, Souza Tamara B, Monfardini Mariane V, Vicentini Fernando, Kitagawa Sônia S, Scaletsky Isabel C A, Spano Liliana C
Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Rua Botucatu, 862, 3 andar, 04023-062, São Paulo, Brazil.
BMC Infect Dis. 2013 Sep 8;13:418. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-418.
Childhood diarrheal diseases remain highly endemic in developing areas of Brazil. The importance of Escherichia coli among children with diarrhea in these areas was unknown. This study determined the prevalence of different E. coli categories in symptomatic and asymptomatic children from low socioeconomic level rural communities in southeastern Brazil.
A total of 560 stool samples were collected from 141 children with diarrhea (< 10 years) and 419 apparently healthy controls who resided in 23 communities. E. coli isolates (n = 1943) were subjected to two multiplex PCRs developed for the detection of enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC), enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), and Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC). Strains were also examined for the presence of EPEC, EAEC, and DAEC by assays of adhesion to HEp-2 cells and by hybridization with specific DNA probes.
Diarrheagenic E. coli strains were isolated from 253 (45.2%) children, and were associated with diarrhea in children aged < 5 years (p < 0.001). EAEC (20.9%), DAEC (11.6%), EPEC (9.3%) were the most frequent pathotypes, followed by ETEC (2.7%), EIEC (0.5%), and STEC (0.2%). Depending of the assay, EPEC, EAEC, and DAEC (collectively termed enteroadherent E. coli) strains were isolated in 45% to 56% of diarrhea cases, a significantly higher incidence than in controls (P < 0.05). Individually, only DAEC showed significant association with diarrhea (p < 0.05), particularly in children aged 2-5 years.
This study indicates that enteroadherent E. coli is an important cause of diarrhea in children living in low socioeconomic level communities in southeastern Brazil. Our results reveal that the PCR1 assay is an excellent tool for the identification of EAEC and DAEC.
儿童腹泻病在巴西的发展中地区仍然高度流行。在这些地区腹泻儿童中大肠杆菌的重要性尚不清楚。本研究确定了巴西东南部社会经济水平较低的农村社区有症状和无症状儿童中不同类别大肠杆菌的流行情况。
从居住在23个社区的141名腹泻儿童(<10岁)和419名看似健康的对照儿童中总共收集了560份粪便样本。对大肠杆菌分离株(n = 1943)进行了两种多重PCR,用于检测肠致病性大肠杆菌(EPEC)、肠聚集性大肠杆菌(EAEC)、弥漫性粘附大肠杆菌(DAEC)、产肠毒素大肠杆菌(ETEC)、肠侵袭性大肠杆菌(EIEC)和产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)。还通过检测对HEp-2细胞的粘附以及与特异性DNA探针杂交来检查菌株中是否存在EPEC、EAEC和DAEC。
从253名(45.2%)儿童中分离出致泻性大肠杆菌菌株,并且与<5岁儿童的腹泻有关(p < 0.001)。EAEC(20.9%)、DAEC(11.6%)、EPEC(9.3%)是最常见的致病型,其次是ETEC(2.7%)、EIEC(0.5%)和STEC(0.2%)。根据检测方法,在45%至56%的腹泻病例中分离出EPEC、EAEC和DAEC(统称为肠粘附性大肠杆菌)菌株,其发病率显著高于对照组(P < 0.05)。单独来看,只有DAEC与腹泻有显著关联(p < 0.05),特别是在2至5岁的儿童中。
本研究表明,肠粘附性大肠杆菌是巴西东南部社会经济水平较低社区儿童腹泻的重要原因。我们的结果表明,PCR1检测是鉴定EAEC和DAEC的优秀工具。