Stubbe Janine H, Chorus Astrid M J, Frank Laurence E, de Hon Olivier, van der Heijden Peter G M
TNO, PO Box 2215, 2301 CE, Leiden, the Netherlands; Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, School of Sports & Nutrition, Dr Meurerlaan 8, 1067 SM, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Drug Test Anal. 2014 May;6(5):434-8. doi: 10.1002/dta.1525. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
Studies on the use of performance enhancing drugs (PED) in fitness centres rely predominately on conventional survey methods using direct questioning. However, research indicates that direct questioning of sensitive information is characterized by under-reporting. The aim of the present study was to contrast direct questioning of different types of PED use by Dutch fitness centre members with results obtained with the Randomized Response Technique (RRT). Questionnaires were conducted among members of fitness centres. PED were classified into the following categories: anabolic steroids, prohormones, substances to counteract side-effects, growth hormone and/or insulin, stimulants (to reduce weight), and miscellaneous substances. A total of 718 athletes from 92 fitness centres completed the questionnaire. The conventional method resulted in prevalences varying between 0% and 0.4% for the different types of PED with an overall prevalence of 0.4%. RRT resulted in prevalences varying between 0.8% and 4.8% for the different types of PED with an overall prevalence of 8.2%. The overall prevalence of the two survey methods differed significantly. The current study showed that the conventional survey method using direct questioning led to an underestimation of the prevalence. Based on the RRT results, the percentage of users of PED among members of fitness centres is approximately 8.2%. Stimulants to lose weight had the highest prevalence, even higher than anabolic steroids. The key task for future preventive health work is to not only focus on anabolic steroid use, but also include interventions focusing on the use of stimulants to lose weight.
关于健身中心使用提高运动成绩药物(PED)的研究主要依赖于使用直接提问的传统调查方法。然而,研究表明,对敏感信息进行直接提问的特点是报告不足。本研究的目的是将荷兰健身中心会员使用不同类型PED的直接提问结果与随机应答技术(RRT)获得的结果进行对比。对健身中心会员进行了问卷调查。PED被分为以下几类:合成代谢类固醇、促激素、对抗副作用的物质、生长激素和/或胰岛素、兴奋剂(用于减肥)以及其他物质。来自92家健身中心的718名运动员完成了问卷。传统方法得出的不同类型PED的流行率在0%至0.4%之间,总体流行率为0.4%。RRT得出的不同类型PED的流行率在0.8%至4.8%之间,总体流行率为8.2%。两种调查方法的总体流行率差异显著。当前研究表明,使用直接提问的传统调查方法导致了流行率的低估。根据RRT结果,健身中心会员中使用PED的比例约为8.2%。用于减肥的兴奋剂流行率最高,甚至高于合成代谢类固醇。未来预防保健工作的关键任务不仅要关注合成代谢类固醇的使用,还应包括针对使用兴奋剂减肥的干预措施。