Department of Psychiatry, Flinders Human Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Flinders University, Room 4T306, Margaret Tobin Centre, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Sep 10;10(9):4224-44. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10094224.
The culture of smoking by patients and staff within mental health systems of care has a long and entrenched history. Cigarettes have been used as currency between patients and as a patient management tool by staff. These settings have traditionally been exempt from smoke-free policy because of complex held views about the capacity of people with mental disorder to tolerate such policy whilst they are acutely unwell, with stakeholders' continuing fierce debate about rights, choice and duty of care. This culture has played a significant role in perpetuating physical, social and economic smoking associated impacts experienced by people with mental disorder who receive care within mental health care settings. The past decade has seen a clear policy shift towards smoke-free mental health settings in several countries. While many services have been successful in implementing this change, many issues remain to be resolved for genuine smoke-free policy in mental health settings to be realized. This literature review draws on evidence from the international published research, including national audits of smoke-free policy implementation in mental health units in Australia and England, in order to synthesise what we know works, why it works, and the remaining barriers to smoke-free policy and how appropriate interventions are provided to people with mental disorder.
在精神卫生保健系统中,患者和工作人员的吸烟文化由来已久。香烟曾被用作患者之间的货币,也被工作人员用作患者管理工具。这些场所由于人们普遍认为患有精神障碍的人在病情严重时无法忍受此类政策,再加上利益相关者就权利、选择和护理责任持续激烈争论,因此传统上一直豁免于无烟政策。这种文化在延续精神障碍患者在精神卫生保健环境中接受护理时所经历的与吸烟有关的身体、社会和经济影响方面发挥了重要作用。在过去的十年中,一些国家明显朝着无烟精神卫生保健环境的政策方向转变。虽然许多服务已经成功实施了这一变革,但要实现真正的精神卫生保健环境中的无烟政策,仍有许多问题需要解决。本文献综述借鉴了国际已发表研究的证据,包括澳大利亚和英国对精神卫生单位无烟政策实施情况的国家审计,以综合了解哪些措施有效、为什么有效,以及实现无烟政策的剩余障碍,以及如何向精神障碍患者提供适当的干预措施。