Smania Nicola, Fonte Cristina, Picelli Alessandro, Gandolfi Marialuisa, Varalta Valentina
Department of Neurological and Movement Sciences, Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Verona , Verona , Italy.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 2;7:527. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00527.
Eye patching (EP; monocular or right hemifield) has been proposed to improve visuospatial attention to the ignored field in patients with hemispatial neglect. The aim of this paper is to review the literature on the effects of EP in hemispatial neglect after stroke in order to convey evidence-based recommendations to clinicians in stroke rehabilitation. Thirteen intervention studies were selected from the Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, PsychINFO, EBRSR, and Health Star databases. Methodological quality was defined according to the Physiotherapy Evidence Database. Overall, seven studies used monocular EP, five used right hemifield patching, and one compared right monocular with right hemifield patching. Seven studies compared normal viewing to monocular or hemifield patching conditions. Six studies included a period of treatment. As to the monocular EP, four studies reported positive effects of right monocular patching. One study showed an improvement in hemispatial neglect with left monocular patching. Two studies found no superiority of right vs. left monocular patching. One study found no effects of right monocular patching. As to the right hemifield EP, one study showed improvements in neglect after right hemifield patching. Three studies found that right hemifield patching combined with another rehabilitation technique was more effective than that treatment alone. One study found no differences between right hemifield patching combined with another treatment and that treatment alone. One study found the same effect between right hemifield patching alone and another rehabilitation technique. Our results globally tend to support the usefulness of right hemifield EP in clinical practice. In order to define a level of evidence with the standard rehabilitation evidence rating tools, further properly powered randomized controlled trials or meta-analysis are needed.
眼罩遮盖疗法(EP;单眼或右半视野)已被提出用于改善半侧空间忽视患者对被忽视视野的视觉空间注意力。本文的目的是回顾关于眼罩遮盖疗法对中风后半侧空间忽视影响的文献,以便向中风康复领域的临床医生传达基于证据的建议。从医学在线数据库(Medline)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、Scopus数据库、考克兰图书馆、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL)、心理学文摘数据库(PsychINFO)、循证康复与系统评价数据库(EBRSR)以及健康之星数据库中选取了13项干预性研究。方法学质量依据物理治疗证据数据库进行界定。总体而言,7项研究采用单眼罩遮盖疗法,5项采用右半视野眼罩遮盖疗法,1项比较了右单眼眼罩遮盖疗法与右半视野眼罩遮盖疗法。7项研究将正常视觉与单眼或半视野眼罩遮盖情况进行了比较。6项研究纳入了一个治疗期。对于单眼罩遮盖疗法,4项研究报告了右单眼罩遮盖疗法的积极效果。1项研究表明左单眼罩遮盖疗法可改善半侧空间忽视。2项研究发现右单眼罩遮盖疗法与左单眼罩遮盖疗法无优越性差异。1项研究发现右单眼罩遮盖疗法无效果。对于右半视野眼罩遮盖疗法,1项研究表明右半视野眼罩遮盖疗法后忽视症状有所改善。3项研究发现右半视野眼罩遮盖疗法与另一种康复技术相结合比单独该治疗更有效。1项研究发现右半视野眼罩遮盖疗法与另一种治疗相结合和单独该治疗之间无差异。1项研究发现单独右半视野眼罩遮盖疗法与另一种康复技术效果相同。我们的结果总体上倾向于支持右半视野眼罩遮盖疗法在临床实践中的有效性。为了使用标准康复证据评级工具确定证据水平,需要进一步开展有足够效力的随机对照试验或荟萃分析。