Suppr超能文献

比较和验证 2 种分析方法测量尿蔗糖和果糖排泄。

Comparison and validation of 2 analytical methods for measurement of urinary sucrose and fructose excretion.

机构信息

Cancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.

出版信息

Nutr Res. 2013 Sep;33(9):696-703. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2013.05.017. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

Abstract

Urinary sugars excretion has been proposed as a potential biomarker for intake of sugars. In this study, we compared 2 analytical methods (gas chromatography [GC] and enzymatic reactions-UV absorption) for quantifying urinary fructose and sucrose using 24-hour urine samples from a randomized crossover controlled feeding study. All samples were successfully quantified by the GC method; however, 21% and 1.9% of samples were below the detection limit of the enzymatic method for sucrose and fructose, respectively. Although the correlation between the 2 methods was good for fructose (Pearson correlation, 0.71), the correlation was weak for sucrose (Pearson correlation, 0.27). We favor the GC method because of its better sensitivity, simplicity, and the ability to quantify fructose and sucrose directly in the same run. Of the 106 samples from 53 participants with complete urine collection after 2 study diets, 24-hour urinary fructose excretion was significantly associated with fructose intake. The sum of 24-hour urinary fructose and sucrose was significantly associated with total sugars consumption. However, variation in intakes of sugars explained only a modest amount of variation in urinary sugars excretion. In the unadjusted models, fructose intake explained 24.3% of urinary fructose excretion, and intake of total sugars explained 16.3% of the sum of urinary fructose and sucrose. The adjusted models explained 44.3% of urinary fructose excretion and 41.7% of the sum of urinary fructose and sucrose. Therefore, we caution using these biomarkers to predict sugars consumption before other factors that determine urinary sugars excretion are understood.

摘要

尿糖排泄被认为是摄入糖的潜在生物标志物。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种分析方法(气相色谱法[GC]和酶反应-紫外吸收法),用于定量 24 小时尿液样本中的果糖和蔗糖。GC 方法成功定量了所有样本;然而,21%和 1.9%的蔗糖和果糖样本的检测限以下。虽然两种方法之间的相关性良好(果糖的 Pearson 相关系数为 0.71),但蔗糖的相关性较弱(Pearson 相关系数为 0.27)。我们倾向于使用 GC 方法,因为它具有更好的灵敏度、简单性,并且能够直接在同一次运行中定量果糖和蔗糖。在 106 个样本中,有 53 个参与者在完成两种研究饮食后的 24 小时内完成了尿液收集,24 小时尿果糖排泄与果糖摄入量显著相关。24 小时尿果糖和蔗糖的总和与总糖摄入量显著相关。然而,糖摄入量的变化仅能解释尿糖排泄变化的一小部分。在未调整的模型中,果糖摄入量解释了 24.3%的尿果糖排泄,总糖摄入量解释了尿果糖和蔗糖总和的 16.3%。调整后的模型解释了 44.3%的尿果糖排泄和 41.7%的尿果糖和蔗糖总和。因此,我们在理解决定尿糖排泄的其他因素之前,对使用这些生物标志物来预测糖的摄入量持谨慎态度。

相似文献

1
Comparison and validation of 2 analytical methods for measurement of urinary sucrose and fructose excretion.
Nutr Res. 2013 Sep;33(9):696-703. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2013.05.017. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
2
Urinary sucrose and fructose as biomarkers for sugar consumption.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1287-94. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0827.
6
Urinary sucrose and fructose to validate self-reported sugar intake in children and adolescents: results from the I.Family study.
Eur J Nutr. 2019 Apr;58(3):1247-1258. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1649-6. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
7
Urinary sucrose and fructose as biomarkers of sugar consumption: comparison of normal weight and obese volunteers.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Nov;32(11):1736-40. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.145. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
10
Biomarker-predicted sugars intake compared with self-reported measures in US Hispanics/Latinos: results from the HCHS/SOL SOLNAS study.
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Dec;19(18):3256-3264. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016001580. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Urinary metabolites as biomarkers of dietary intake: a systematic review.
Front Nutr. 2025 May 15;12:1596543. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1596543. eCollection 2025.
3
The complex human urinary sugar profile: determinants revealed in the cross-sectional KarMeN study.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Sep 1;108(3):502-516. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy131.
4
Intestinal Absorption of Fructose.
Annu Rev Nutr. 2018 Aug 21;38:41-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-082117-051707. Epub 2018 May 11.
6
Measurement of Circulating Phospholipid Fatty Acids: Association between Relative Weight Percentage and Absolute Concentrations.
J Am Coll Nutr. 2016 Sep-Oct;35(7):647-656. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2015.1116417. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
7
Urinary Sugars--A Biomarker of Total Sugars Intake.
Nutrients. 2015 Jul 15;7(7):5816-33. doi: 10.3390/nu7075255.
8
Use of a urinary sugars biomarker to assess measurement error in self-reported sugars intake in the nutrition and physical activity assessment study (NPAAS).
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Dec;23(12):2874-83. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0594. Epub 2014 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2013 Jan 1;127(1):e6-e245. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31828124ad. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
4
Use of the predictive sugars biomarker to evaluate self-reported total sugars intake in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Mar;20(3):490-500. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0820. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
5
Dietary sources of energy, solid fats, and added sugars among children and adolescents in the United States.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Oct;110(10):1477-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.07.010.
6
Evaluation of a novel isotope biomarker for dietary consumption of sweets.
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Nov 1;172(9):1045-52. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq247. Epub 2010 Sep 3.
7
Urinary fructose: a potential biomarker for dietary fructose intake in children.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2010 Nov;64(11):1365-70. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.160. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
8
Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis.
Diabetes Care. 2010 Nov;33(11):2477-83. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1079. Epub 2010 Aug 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验