Suppr超能文献

比较和验证 2 种分析方法测量尿蔗糖和果糖排泄。

Comparison and validation of 2 analytical methods for measurement of urinary sucrose and fructose excretion.

机构信息

Cancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.

出版信息

Nutr Res. 2013 Sep;33(9):696-703. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2013.05.017. Epub 2013 Jul 3.

Abstract

Urinary sugars excretion has been proposed as a potential biomarker for intake of sugars. In this study, we compared 2 analytical methods (gas chromatography [GC] and enzymatic reactions-UV absorption) for quantifying urinary fructose and sucrose using 24-hour urine samples from a randomized crossover controlled feeding study. All samples were successfully quantified by the GC method; however, 21% and 1.9% of samples were below the detection limit of the enzymatic method for sucrose and fructose, respectively. Although the correlation between the 2 methods was good for fructose (Pearson correlation, 0.71), the correlation was weak for sucrose (Pearson correlation, 0.27). We favor the GC method because of its better sensitivity, simplicity, and the ability to quantify fructose and sucrose directly in the same run. Of the 106 samples from 53 participants with complete urine collection after 2 study diets, 24-hour urinary fructose excretion was significantly associated with fructose intake. The sum of 24-hour urinary fructose and sucrose was significantly associated with total sugars consumption. However, variation in intakes of sugars explained only a modest amount of variation in urinary sugars excretion. In the unadjusted models, fructose intake explained 24.3% of urinary fructose excretion, and intake of total sugars explained 16.3% of the sum of urinary fructose and sucrose. The adjusted models explained 44.3% of urinary fructose excretion and 41.7% of the sum of urinary fructose and sucrose. Therefore, we caution using these biomarkers to predict sugars consumption before other factors that determine urinary sugars excretion are understood.

摘要

尿糖排泄被认为是摄入糖的潜在生物标志物。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种分析方法(气相色谱法[GC]和酶反应-紫外吸收法),用于定量 24 小时尿液样本中的果糖和蔗糖。GC 方法成功定量了所有样本;然而,21%和 1.9%的蔗糖和果糖样本的检测限以下。虽然两种方法之间的相关性良好(果糖的 Pearson 相关系数为 0.71),但蔗糖的相关性较弱(Pearson 相关系数为 0.27)。我们倾向于使用 GC 方法,因为它具有更好的灵敏度、简单性,并且能够直接在同一次运行中定量果糖和蔗糖。在 106 个样本中,有 53 个参与者在完成两种研究饮食后的 24 小时内完成了尿液收集,24 小时尿果糖排泄与果糖摄入量显著相关。24 小时尿果糖和蔗糖的总和与总糖摄入量显著相关。然而,糖摄入量的变化仅能解释尿糖排泄变化的一小部分。在未调整的模型中,果糖摄入量解释了 24.3%的尿果糖排泄,总糖摄入量解释了尿果糖和蔗糖总和的 16.3%。调整后的模型解释了 44.3%的尿果糖排泄和 41.7%的尿果糖和蔗糖总和。因此,我们在理解决定尿糖排泄的其他因素之前,对使用这些生物标志物来预测糖的摄入量持谨慎态度。

相似文献

2
Urinary sucrose and fructose as biomarkers for sugar consumption.尿中蔗糖和果糖作为糖摄入的生物标志物。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 May;14(5):1287-94. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0827.

引用本文的文献

4
Intestinal Absorption of Fructose.果糖的肠道吸收。
Annu Rev Nutr. 2018 Aug 21;38:41-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-082117-051707. Epub 2018 May 11.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验