MBChB, FRACP, GDip, Epi Biostats, Centre for Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Rd, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Pediatrics. 2013 Oct;132(4):e895-904. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3878. Epub 2013 Sep 16.
Population approaches to lessen the adverse impacts of preschool language delay remain elusive. We aimed to determine whether systematic ascertainment of language delay at age 4 years, followed by a 10-month, 1-on-1 intervention, improves language and related outcomes at age 5 years.
A randomized trial nested within a cross-sectional ascertainment of language delay. Children with expressive and/or receptive language scores more than 1.25 SD below the mean at age 4 years entered the trial. Children randomly allocated to the intervention received 18 1-hour home-based therapy sessions. The primary outcomes were receptive and expressive language (Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals - Preschool, 2(nd) Edition) and secondary outcomes were child phonological skills, letter awareness, pragmatic skills, behavior, and quality of life.
A total of 1464 children were assessed for language delay at age 4 years. Of 266 eligible children, 200 (13.6%) entered the trial, with 91 intervention (92% of 99) and 88 control (87% of 101) children retained at age 5 years. At age 5 years, there was weak evidence of benefit to expressive (adjusted mean difference, intervention - control, 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.5 to 4.4; P = .12) but not receptive (0.6; 95% CI -2.5 to 3.8; P = .69) language. The intervention improved phonological awareness skills (5.0; 95% CI 2.2 to 7.8; P < .001) and letter knowledge (2.4; 95% CI 0.3 to 4.5; P = .03), but not other secondary outcomes.
A standardized yet flexible 18-session language intervention was successfully delivered by non-specialist staff, found to be acceptable and feasible, and has the potential to improve long-term consequences of early language delay within a public health framework.
降低学龄前语言发育迟缓不良影响的人群方法仍难以捉摸。我们旨在确定在 4 岁时系统地确定语言发育迟缓,然后进行为期 10 个月的 1 对 1 干预,是否能改善 5 岁时的语言和相关结果。
这是一项嵌套在 4 岁时语言发育迟缓横断面确定中的随机试验。在 4 岁时,表达和/或接受语言评分低于平均值 1.25 个标准差的儿童进入试验。随机分配到干预组的儿童接受 18 次 1 小时的家庭基础治疗。主要结局是接受性和表达性语言(临床语言基础知识评估 - 第 2 版),次要结局是儿童语音技能、字母意识、语用技能、行为和生活质量。
共有 1464 名儿童在 4 岁时接受语言发育迟缓评估。在 266 名符合条件的儿童中,有 200 名(13.6%)进入试验,91 名干预(99%的 99)和 88 名对照(101%的 87)儿童在 5 岁时保留。在 5 岁时,表达能力的干预有微弱的获益证据(调整后的平均差异,干预 - 对照,2.0;95%置信区间[CI] -0.5 至 4.4;P =.12),但接受能力没有获益(0.6;95%CI -2.5 至 3.8;P =.69)。干预改善了语音意识技能(5.0;95%CI 2.2 至 7.8;P <.001)和字母知识(2.4;95%CI 0.3 至 4.5;P =.03),但其他次要结局没有改善。
一种标准化但灵活的 18 节语言干预措施由非专业人员成功实施,被发现是可接受和可行的,并有可能在公共卫生框架内改善早期语言发育迟缓的长期后果。