• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丹麦重返工作方案对长期病假的影响:来自三个市的随机对照试验结果。

Effect of the Danish return-to-work program on long-term sickness absence: results from a randomized controlled trial in three municipalities.

机构信息

National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkalle 105, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014 Jan;40(1):47-56. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3383. Epub 2013 Sep 17.

DOI:10.5271/sjweh.3383
PMID:24045856
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Danish return-to-work (RTW) program on long-term sickness absence in a randomized controlled trial in three municipalities.

METHODS

The intervention group comprised 1948 participants while the control group comprised 1157 participant receiving ordinary sickness benefit management (OSM). Study participants were working-age adults receiving long-term (≥8 weeks or more) benefits, included regardless of reason for sickness absence or employment status. Each beneficiary was followed-up for a maximum period of 52 weeks. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for return to work (RTW) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

The intervention effect differed significantly between the municipalities (P=0.00005). In one municipality (M2) the intervention resulted in a statistically significant increased rate of recovery from long-term sickness absence (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.31-1.74). In the other two municipalities, the intervention did not show a statistically significant effect (HR M11.12, 95% CI 0.97-1.29, and HR M30.80, 95% CI 0.63-1.03, respectively). Adjustment for a series of possible confounders only marginally altered the estimated HR.

CONCLUSION

The effect of the intervention differed substantially between the three municipalities, indicating that that contextual factors are of major importance for success or failure of this complex intervention.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过在三个市的随机对照试验评估丹麦的返工(RTW)方案对长期病假的影响。

方法

干预组包括 1948 名参与者,而对照组包括 1157 名接受常规疾病津贴管理(OSM)的参与者。研究参与者为正在工作年龄的成年人,长期(≥8 周或更长时间)领取福利,无论病假原因或就业状况如何,均包括在内。每位受益人最多随访 52 周。使用 Cox 比例风险模型来估计(95%置信区间[95%CI])重返工作岗位(RTW)的风险比(HR)。

结果

干预效果在市之间存在显著差异(P=0.00005)。在一个市(M2),干预导致长期病假康复的速度有统计学意义的提高(HR 1.51,95%CI 1.31-1.74)。在另外两个市,干预没有显示出统计学意义上的效果(HR M11.12,95%CI 0.97-1.29,和 HR M30.80,95%CI 0.63-1.03,分别)。对一系列可能的混杂因素进行调整,仅略微改变了估计的 HR。

结论

干预效果在三个市之间存在很大差异,表明情境因素对于这种复杂干预的成功或失败至关重要。

相似文献

1
Effect of the Danish return-to-work program on long-term sickness absence: results from a randomized controlled trial in three municipalities.丹麦重返工作方案对长期病假的影响:来自三个市的随机对照试验结果。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2014 Jan;40(1):47-56. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3383. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
2
A multisite randomized controlled trial on time to self-support among sickness absence beneficiaries. The Danish national return-to-work programme.一项关于疾病缺勤受益者实现自给自足时间的多中心随机对照试验。丹麦国家重返工作岗位计划。
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb;25(1):96-102. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku016. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
3
Improving the effectiveness of sickness benefit case management through a public-private partnership? A difference-in-difference analysis in eighteen Danish municipalities.通过公私伙伴关系提高疾病津贴案例管理的有效性?丹麦18个市镇的双重差分分析。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 18;17(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4236-5.
4
The Danish national return-to-work program--aims, content, and design of the process and effect evaluation.丹麦国家重返工作岗位计划——目的、内容、流程设计及效果评估。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012 Mar;38(2):120-33. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3272. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
5
Return to work after work-related stress: a randomized controlled trial of a work-focused cognitive behavioral intervention.与工作相关压力后的重返工作:一项以工作为重点的认知行为干预随机对照试验
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 Sep 1;43(5):436-446. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3655. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
6
Predictors of return to work in employees sick-listed with mental health problems: findings from a longitudinal study.精神健康问题员工请病假后重返工作岗位的预测因素:一项纵向研究的结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2011 Dec;21(6):806-11. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckq171. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
7
Stability of return to work after a coordinated and tailored intervention for sickness absence compensation beneficiaries with mental health problems: results of a two-year follow-up study.针对患有心理健康问题的疾病缺勤补偿受益人进行协调和量身定制的干预后恢复工作的稳定性:一项为期两年的随访研究结果
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(22):2107-13. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.1001524. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
Effects of a randomized controlled intervention trial on return to work and health care utilization after long-term sickness absence.一项随机对照干预试验对长期病假后重返工作岗位及医疗保健利用情况的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 9;16(1):1149. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3812-4.
9
Integrated mental health care and vocational rehabilitation to improve return to work rates for people on sick leave because of exhaustion disorder, adjustment disorder, and distress (the Danish IBBIS trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.综合精神卫生保健与职业康复以提高因精疲力竭症、适应障碍和精神困扰而休病假者的复工率(丹麦IBBIS试验):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 2;18(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2273-0.
10
Effectiveness of a blended web-based intervention on return to work for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于网络的综合干预措施对患有常见精神障碍的病假员工重返工作岗位的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 13;17(5):e116. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4097.

引用本文的文献

1
Fifty years of research in the Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health.《斯堪的纳维亚工作、环境与健康杂志》五十年的研究成果。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024 Jan 1;50(1):3-10. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4135. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
2
Association of short poor work ability measure with increased mortality risk: a prospective multicohort study.短时间内工作能力较差与死亡率风险增加相关:一项前瞻性多队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 22;12(12):e065672. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065672.
3
Effectiveness of work-related interventions for return to work in people on sick leave: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
工作相关干预措施对病假员工重返工作岗位的有效性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 5;11(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02055-7.
4
Do baseline industry and job group skill level predict welfare dependency at 1, 3 and 5 years after mental health related sickness absence? A Danish cohort study.基线行业和职业群体技能水平是否预测心理健康相关病假 1、3 和 5 年后的福利依赖?一项丹麦队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):697. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13105-z.
5
An innovative case management intervention for people at high risk of permanent work disability to improve rehabilitation coverage and coordination of health services: a randomized controlled trial (AktiFAME, DRKS00024648).一项针对永久性工作残疾高风险人群的创新病例管理干预措施,以改善康复服务的覆盖范围和协调:一项随机对照试验(AktiFAME,DRKS00024648)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 15;22(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07482-9.
6
Alternative duty work as workplace-initiated procedure to reduce sickness absence.作为工作场所发起的减少病假的程序的替代职责工作。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 16;21(1):1154. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11181-1.
7
Comparing two interdisciplinary occupational rehabilitation programs for employees on sick leave: a mixed-method design study protocol.比较两种针对病假员工的跨学科职业康复计划:一项混合方法设计研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 9;22(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-03994-3.
8
Self-reported work ability predicts health-related exit and absence from work, work participation, and death: longitudinal findings from a sample of German employees.自我报告的工作能力可预测与健康相关的离职和缺勤、工作参与度和死亡:来自德国员工样本的纵向研究结果。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 May;94(4):591-599. doi: 10.1007/s00420-020-01608-4. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
9
Musculoskeletal pain as a predictor for depression in the general working population of Denmark.肌肉骨骼疼痛是丹麦普通工作人群中抑郁的预测因素。
Scand J Public Health. 2021 Aug;49(6):589-597. doi: 10.1177/1403494819875337. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
10
The association between having a coordinator and return to work: the rapid-return-to-work cohort study.协调员与重返工作岗位之间的关联:快速重返工作岗位队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 18;9(2):e024597. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024597.