• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在姑息治疗中对癌症家族史进行分诊是否可以更早地进行遗传咨询干预?

Could triaging family history of cancer during palliative care enable earlier genetic counseling intervention?

机构信息

1 Department of Genetics, University of Leicester , United Kingdom .

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2013 Nov;16(11):1350-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0583. Epub 2013 Sep 24.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2012.0583
PMID:24063552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3822399/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients are commonly referred to cancer genetics services when all affected family members are deceased. This makes genetic testing and risk assessment more difficult, reducing the benefit from screening and prophylactic treatment.

METHODS

Observational, retrospective, cohort study of 508 randomly selected patients referred to a regional cancer genetics unit, using review of case notes to explore whether a simple clinical "3, 2, 1" family history rule could have been used to improve timely and appropriate referrals for genetic assessment. The 3, 2, 1 criteria are: three affected relatives with the same/associated cancers, across two generations, with at least one person affected age <50 years.

RESULTS

Most (71% [362]) genetic risk assessment referrals were in unaffected individuals and 22% (80) of these were referred after all affected family members had died, including 24% (19) who lost their last remaining affected relative in the previous year. Most (59% [301]) referrals met all 3, 2, 1 criteria, and 67% of these could have been made earlier in clinical practice. A further 23% (115) met two of the three criteria.

CONCLUSION

Using a simple "3, 2, 1" family rule in cancer care and particularly in palliative care could enable earlier cancer genetic risk assessment for unaffected relatives, improving the potential to benefit from targeted screening and intervention.

摘要

背景

当所有受影响的家庭成员都去世时,患者通常会被转介到癌症遗传学服务机构。这使得基因检测和风险评估更加困难,降低了筛查和预防性治疗的获益。

方法

对 508 名随机选择的被转介到区域癌症遗传学单位的患者进行观察性、回顾性队列研究,通过病历回顾来探讨简单的临床“3、2、1”家族史规则是否可用于改善遗传评估的及时和适当转介。3、2、1 标准为:三代中有三个具有相同/相关癌症的受影响亲属,跨越两代,至少有一个人在 50 岁以下受到影响。

结果

大多数(71%[362])遗传风险评估转介是针对无影响个体的,其中 22%(80 人)是在所有受影响的家庭成员都去世后进行的转介,包括 24%(19 人)在去年失去了最后一个仍受影响的亲属。大多数(59%[301])转介符合所有 3、2、1 标准,其中 67%的转介本可以在临床实践中更早进行。另有 23%(115 人)符合三个标准中的两个。

结论

在癌症护理中,特别是在姑息治疗中使用简单的“3、2、1”家族规则,可以使未受影响的亲属更早地进行癌症遗传风险评估,提高通过针对性筛查和干预获益的潜力。

相似文献

1
Could triaging family history of cancer during palliative care enable earlier genetic counseling intervention?在姑息治疗中对癌症家族史进行分诊是否可以更早地进行遗传咨询干预?
J Palliat Med. 2013 Nov;16(11):1350-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0583. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
2
Multidisciplinary interventions in a specialist Drug Development Unit to improve family history documentation and onward referral of patients with advanced cancer to cancer genetics services.多学科干预在专科药物开发单位,以改善先进癌症患者的家族史记录,并将其转介至癌症遗传服务。
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jun;114:97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 16.
3
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明更新:癌症易感性基因检测
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2397-406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.189. Epub 2003 Apr 11.
4
Exploring cancer genetics and care of the family: an evolving challenge for palliative care.探索癌症遗传学与家庭关怀:姑息治疗面临的不断演变的挑战。
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2006 Feb;12(2):70-4. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2006.12.2.20533.
5
Adherence Patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for Referral of Women With Breast Cancer to Genetics Professionals.乳腺癌女性转诊至遗传学专业人员的国家综合癌症网络指南的遵循模式。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug;39(4):363-7. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000073.
6
Prevalence and healthcare actions of women in a large health system with a family history meeting the 2005 USPSTF recommendation for BRCA genetic counseling referral.在一个有家族病史且符合 2005 年 USPSTF 推荐进行 BRCA 基因咨询转诊标准的大型医疗体系中,具有家族病史的女性的流行情况和医疗保健措施。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Apr;22(4):728-35. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-1280. Epub 2013 Jan 31.
7
Improving the referral process for familial breast cancer genetic counselling: findings of three randomised controlled trials of two interventions.改善家族性乳腺癌遗传咨询的转诊流程:两项干预措施的三项随机对照试验结果
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Feb;9(3):iii-iv, 1-126. doi: 10.3310/hta9030.
8
Referrals of patients to colorectal cancer genetics services in south-east Scotland.苏格兰东南部患者转介至结直肠癌遗传学服务机构的情况。
Fam Cancer. 2005;4(2):151-61. doi: 10.1007/s10689-004-4488-y.
9
Timing of palliative care team referrals for inpatients receiving rapid response services: A retrospective pilot study in a US hospital.快速反应服务住院患者的姑息治疗团队转介时机:美国医院的回顾性试点研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2017 Oct;75:147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.07.017. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
10
Adherence to guidelines for the referral of patients with colorectal cancer and abnormal tumour tissue testing for assessment of Lynch syndrome.遵循结直肠癌患者转诊及异常肿瘤组织检测以评估林奇综合征的指南。
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Oct;89(10):1281-1285. doi: 10.1111/ans.15054. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A survey of genetic and palliative care health professionals' views of integrating genetics into palliative care.遗传与姑息治疗健康专业人员对将遗传学纳入姑息治疗的看法的调查。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Jan;32(1):109-116. doi: 10.1038/s41431-023-01409-6. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
2
Approaching discussions about genetics with palliative patients and their families: a qualitative exploration with genetic health professionals.与姑息治疗患者及其家属探讨遗传学问题:一项针对遗传健康专业人员的定性探索。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 Aug;31(8):945-952. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01179-7. Epub 2022 Sep 5.
3
Views and experiences of palliative care clinicians in addressing genetics with individuals and families: a qualitative study.姑息治疗临床医生在与个人和家庭探讨遗传学问题方面的观点和经验:一项定性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Feb;30(2):1615-1624. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06569-z. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
4
The Role of Palliative Medicine in Assessing Hereditary Cancer Risk.姑息医学在评估遗传性癌症风险中的作用。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Dec;35(12):1490-1497. doi: 10.1177/1049909118778865. Epub 2018 May 29.
5
Mainstreaming genetics in palliative care: barriers and suggestions for clinical genetic services.姑息治疗中遗传学的主流化:临床遗传服务的障碍与建议
J Community Genet. 2018 Jul;9(3):243-256. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0345-1. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
6
Inclusion of diverse populations in genomic research and health services: Genomix workshop report.将不同人群纳入基因组研究和医疗服务:基因组学研讨会报告
J Community Genet. 2017 Oct;8(4):267-273. doi: 10.1007/s12687-017-0317-5. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
7
Issues related to family history of cancer at the end of life: a palliative care providers' survey.临终时与癌症家族史相关的问题:一项姑息治疗提供者的调查。
Fam Cancer. 2018 Apr;17(2):303-307. doi: 10.1007/s10689-017-0021-y.
8
The Spectrum of Caregiving in Palliative Care for Serious, Advanced, Rare Diseases: Key Issues and Research Directions.重症、晚期、罕见病姑息治疗中的照护范围:关键问题与研究方向
J Palliat Med. 2016 Jul;19(7):698-705. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0464. Epub 2016 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of aspirin postdiagnosis improves survival for colon cancer patients.诊断后使用阿司匹林可提高结肠癌患者的生存率。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Apr 24;106(9):1564-70. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.101. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
2
MRI for breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment.磁共振成像在乳腺癌筛查、诊断和治疗中的应用。
Lancet. 2011 Nov 19;378(9805):1804-11. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61350-0.
3
Caring for families with a family history of cancer: why concerns about genetic predisposition are missing from the palliative agenda.照顾有癌症家族史的家庭:为什么姑息治疗议程中缺失了对遗传易感性的关注。
Palliat Med. 2011 Mar;25(2):117-24. doi: 10.1177/0269216310383738. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
4
Inherited susceptibility to common cancers.常见癌症的遗传易感性。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 13;359(20):2143-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0802968.
5
In silico analysis of missense substitutions using sequence-alignment based methods.使用基于序列比对的方法对错义替换进行计算机模拟分析。
Hum Mutat. 2008 Nov;29(11):1327-36. doi: 10.1002/humu.20892.
6
Providing a community-based cancer risk assessment service for a socially and ethnically diverse population.
Fam Cancer. 2007;6(2):189-95. doi: 10.1007/s10689-007-9134-z. Epub 2007 May 23.
7
Estimating the referral rate for cancer genetic assessment from a systematic review of the evidence.通过对证据的系统评价估算癌症基因评估的转诊率。
Br J Cancer. 2007 Jan 29;96(2):391-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603432.
8
Population BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequencies and cancer penetrances: a kin-cohort study in Ontario, Canada.人群中BRCA1和BRCA2基因突变频率及癌症发病风险:加拿大安大略省的一项亲属队列研究
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 Dec 6;98(23):1694-706. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj465.
9
Prevalence and predictors of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based study of breast cancer in white and black American women ages 35 to 64 years.一项针对年龄在35至64岁的美国白人和黑人女性乳腺癌患者的基于人群的研究中,BRCA1和BRCA2突变的患病率及预测因素。
Cancer Res. 2006 Aug 15;66(16):8297-308. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0503.
10
Deficiency of knowledge of genetics and genetic tests among general practitioners, gynecologists, and pediatricians: a global problem.全科医生、妇科医生和儿科医生对遗传学及基因检测的知识欠缺:一个全球性问题。
Genet Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;7(9):605-10. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000182895.28432.c7.