• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发表偏倚的存在及其发生的风险因素。

The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence.

作者信息

Dickersin K

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Md.

出版信息

JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1385-9.

PMID:2406472
Abstract

Publication bias is the tendency on the parts of investigators, reviewers, and editors to submit or accept manuscripts for publication based on the direction or strength of the study findings. Much of what has been learned about publication bias comes from the social sciences, less from the field of medicine. In medicine, three studies have provided direct evidence for this bias. Prevention of publication bias is important both from the scientific perspective (complete dissemination of knowledge) and from the perspective of those who combine results from a number of similar studies (meta-analysis). If treatment decisions are based on the published literature, then the literature must include all available data that is of acceptable quality. Currently, obtaining information regarding all studies undertaken in a given field is difficult, even impossible. Registration of clinical trials, and perhaps other types of studies, is the direction in which the scientific community should move.

摘要

发表偏倚是指研究者、评审人员和编辑根据研究结果的方向或强度来提交或接受稿件发表的倾向。关于发表偏倚的许多知识来自社会科学,而医学领域的相关知识较少。在医学领域,有三项研究为这种偏倚提供了直接证据。从科学角度(知识的全面传播)以及从那些综合多项类似研究结果(荟萃分析)的人的角度来看,预防发表偏倚都很重要。如果治疗决策基于已发表的文献,那么文献必须包括所有质量可接受的可用数据。目前,获取特定领域内所有开展研究的信息很困难,甚至是不可能的。临床试验以及或许其他类型研究的注册,是科学界应该努力的方向。

相似文献

1
The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence.发表偏倚的存在及其发生的风险因素。
JAMA. 1990 Mar 9;263(10):1385-9.
2
An increasing problem in publication ethics: Publication bias and editors' role in avoiding it.出版伦理中日益凸显的问题:发表偏倚以及编辑在避免该问题中的作用。
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Jun;20(2):171-178. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9767-0.
3
How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data.发表性偏倚有多重要?现有数据的综合分析。
AIDS Educ Prev. 1997 Feb;9(1 Suppl):15-21.
4
Publication bias: the problem that won't go away.发表偏倚:一个挥之不去的问题。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Dec 31;703:135-46; discussion 146-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x.
5
Reducing publication bias through trial registration.通过试验注册减少发表偏倚。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jun;109(6):1434-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000266557.11064.2a.
6
Medical journals in the Republic of Macedonia after the Second World War.第二次世界大战后的马其顿共和国医学期刊。
Prilozi. 2011;32(2):11-31.
7
An editor's considerations in publishing industry-sponsored studies.编辑在发表行业资助研究时的考量
Urol Oncol. 2015 Mar;33(3):149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.11.023. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
8
Review articles and publication bias.综述文章与发表偏倚。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1992 May;42(5):587-91.
9
Publication bias in orthopaedic research: an analysis of scientific factors associated with publication in the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume).骨科研究中的发表偏倚:与《骨与关节外科杂志》(美国版)发表相关的科学因素分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Mar;90(3):595-601. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00279.
10
[La Medicina del Lavoro: 100 volumes].[《劳动医学:100卷》]
Med Lav. 2009 Jan-Feb;100(1):3-10.

引用本文的文献

1
Recommender Systems in Health Professions Education: Protocol for a Scoping Review.卫生专业教育中的推荐系统:一项范围综述的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 21;14:e69979. doi: 10.2196/69979.
2
Effectiveness of Workplace Lateral Violence Training for Healthcare Workers: A Scoping Review.针对医护人员的工作场所横向暴力培训的有效性:一项范围综述。
Saf Health Work. 2025 Jun;16(2):127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2025.03.002. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
3
Emotional Prosody Recognition in Autism Spectrum Disorder Without Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
无智力障碍的自闭症谱系障碍中的情感韵律识别:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06833-9.
4
Pooled perspectives: Critical considerations for the modern meta-analysis.汇总观点:现代荟萃分析的关键考量因素
Surg Open Sci. 2025 Mar 19;25:5-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sopen.2025.03.005. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Current best practices and future opportunities for reproducible findings using large-scale neuroimaging in psychiatry.使用大规模神经影像学在精神病学中实现可重现发现的当前最佳实践和未来机会。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Nov;50(1):37-51. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01938-8. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
6
Kidney medicine meets computer vision: a bibliometric analysis.肾脏病医学与计算机视觉:文献计量分析。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Oct;56(10):3361-3380. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04082-w. Epub 2024 May 30.
7
[The contribution of Open Science to the quality of educational research].[开放科学对教育研究质量的贡献]
Z Bild Forsch. 2020;10(3):263-278. doi: 10.1007/s35834-020-00286-z. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
8
Signal Smoothing and Syntactic Choices: A Critical Reflection on the UID Hypothesis.信号平滑与句法选择:对通用标识符假设的批判性反思
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Mar 5;8:217-234. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00125. eCollection 2024.
9
Power to Detect What? Considerations for Planning and Evaluating Sample Size.检测什么的能力?规划和评估样本量的考虑因素。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2024 Aug;28(3):276-301. doi: 10.1177/10888683241228328. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
10
An Evidence-Based Update on the Potential for Malignancy of Oral Lichen Planus and Related Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.口腔扁平苔藓及相关病症恶变可能性的循证更新:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jan 31;16(3):608. doi: 10.3390/cancers16030608.