• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险行为双系统模型中的自下而上特质和自上而下特质在遗传学上是否存在差异?

Are bottom-up and top-down traits in dual-systems models of risky behavior genetically distinct?

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, 210 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA,

出版信息

Behav Genet. 2013 Nov;43(6):480-90. doi: 10.1007/s10519-013-9615-9. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1007/s10519-013-9615-9
PMID:24065563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3929393/
Abstract

Numerous dual-systems models of personality have been posited, which propose that behavior is influenced by two complementary systems. A bottom-up system is characterized by emotion-based drive (e.g., urge for rewarding experience), and a top-down system is characterized by the ability to control those urges. Although evidence suggests that these two systems are distinct and may be important in explaining some behaviors, these constructs are also moderately correlated. Notably, there has been little molecular or behavior genetic research on the genetic distinctness of the two systems central to the dual-systems model. The current study used a national twin sample to investigate the degree to which bottom-up and top-down systems, measured here as personality traits of sensation seeking and lack of planning, respectively, covary through genetic and environmental influences. Whereas the overlap between these systems was primarily comprised of unshared environmental influences (e.g., measurement error and unshared systematic variation) in females, a statistically significant proportion of the overlap was accounted for by genetic factors in men. Further, the genetic factors for these systems were moderately to highly correlated in men (rG = 0.62-0.79). These results provide clear support for a dual-systems model in women; however, these systems appear to share some common genetic influences in men.

摘要

已经提出了许多人格的双重系统模型,这些模型提出行为受到两个互补系统的影响。一个自下而上的系统以基于情感的驱动力为特征(例如,对奖励体验的渴望),而上层系统的特征是能够控制这些冲动。尽管有证据表明这两个系统是不同的,并且可能对解释某些行为很重要,但这些结构也有中度相关性。值得注意的是,对于双系统模型中两个核心系统的遗传独特性,很少有分子或行为遗传学研究。本研究使用全国双胞胎样本,调查了自下而上和自上而下系统(分别在此处测量为感觉寻求和缺乏计划的人格特质)通过遗传和环境影响相互关联的程度。虽然这些系统之间的重叠主要由女性的非共享环境影响(例如,测量误差和非共享系统变化)组成,但在男性中,重叠的一部分由遗传因素解释。此外,这些系统的遗传因素在男性中具有中度到高度相关性(rG=0.62-0.79)。这些结果为女性的双重系统模型提供了明确的支持;然而,这些系统在男性中似乎共享一些共同的遗传影响。

相似文献

1
Are bottom-up and top-down traits in dual-systems models of risky behavior genetically distinct?风险行为双系统模型中的自下而上特质和自上而下特质在遗传学上是否存在差异?
Behav Genet. 2013 Nov;43(6):480-90. doi: 10.1007/s10519-013-9615-9. Epub 2013 Sep 25.
2
Dual-systems models of the genetic architecture of impulsive personality traits: neurogenetic evidence of distinct but related factors.冲动性人格特质的遗传结构的双重系统模型:神经遗传学对不同但相关因素的证据。
Psychol Med. 2024 Jun;54(8):1533-1543. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723003367. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
3
Normal and abnormal personality traits: evidence for genetic and environmental relationships in the Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart.正常与异常人格特质:在明尼苏达分开抚养双胞胎研究中关于基因与环境关系的证据。
J Pers. 2002 Oct;70(5):661-93. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.05020.
4
Genetic overlap between personality and risk for disordered gambling: evidence from a national community-based Australian twin study.人格与赌博障碍风险之间的遗传重叠:来自澳大利亚全国社区双胞胎研究的证据。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2013 Feb;122(1):250-5. doi: 10.1037/a0029999. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
5
Genetic and environmental contributions to the inverse association between specific autistic traits and experience seeking in adults.遗传和环境因素对成年人特定自闭症特征与寻求刺激之间负相关关系的影响。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2016 Dec;171(8):1190-1197. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32352. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
6
Genetic and environmental influences underlying the relationship between autistic traits and temperament and character dimensions in adulthood.成年自闭症特质与气质和性格维度之间关系的遗传和环境影响。
Compr Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;58:178-88. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.12.018. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
7
Adolescent personality moderates genetic and environmental influences on relationships with parents.青少年的个性会调节基因和环境对亲子关系的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 May;94(5):899-912. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.899.
8
Identical genetic influences underpin behavior problems in adolescence and basic traits of personality.相同的基因影响是青少年行为问题和基本人格特质的基础。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;55(8):865-75. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12156. Epub 2013 Oct 25.
9
Nature vs nurture: are leaders born or made? A behavior genetic investigation of leadership style.天性与教养:领导者是天生的还是后天造就的?领导风格的行为遗传学调查。
Twin Res. 1998 Dec;1(4):216-23. doi: 10.1375/136905298320566195.
10
Psychopathic personality traits in 5 year old twins: the importance of genetic and shared environmental influences.5岁双胞胎的精神病态人格特质:基因和共同环境影响的重要性
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;26(4):469-479. doi: 10.1007/s00787-016-0899-1. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk Factors for Consensual and Coercive Sexual Hookup Behaviors Among College Men: A Daily Diary Study.大学男生中自愿与强迫性性勾搭行为的风险因素:一项日记研究
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2025 Mar;86(2):261-270. doi: 10.15288/jsad.24-00005. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
Binge drinking trajectories across adolescence and early adulthood: Associations with genetic influences for dual-systems impulsive personality traits, alcohol consumption, and alcohol use disorder.青少年期和成年早期的暴饮轨迹:与双系统冲动型人格特质、饮酒量及酒精使用障碍的遗传影响的关联
medRxiv. 2024 Oct 16:2024.10.15.24315471. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.15.24315471.
3
Dual-systems models of the genetic architecture of impulsive personality traits: neurogenetic evidence of distinct but related factors.冲动性人格特质的遗传结构的双重系统模型:神经遗传学对不同但相关因素的证据。
Psychol Med. 2024 Jun;54(8):1533-1543. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723003367. Epub 2023 Nov 29.
4
Ischemic preconditioning and exercise performance: are the psychophysiological responses underestimated?缺血预处理与运动表现:心理生理反应是否被低估了?
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023 Apr;123(4):683-693. doi: 10.1007/s00421-022-05109-9. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
5
A Role for Serotonin in Modulating Opposing Drive and Brake Circuits of Impulsivity.血清素在调节冲动的对立驱动和制动回路中的作用。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2022 Feb 17;16:791749. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.791749. eCollection 2022.
6
Ethical concerns relating to genetic risk scores for suicide.与自杀遗传风险评分相关的伦理问题。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2021 Dec;186(8):433-444. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32871. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
7
Delineating Developmental Periods in Adulthood Suggests Age-Related Shifts in the Correlates of Alcohol Use and Problems.成年期发展阶段的划分表明,与酒精使用和问题相关的因素随年龄变化而变化。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021 Feb;45(2):446-456. doi: 10.1111/acer.14535. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
8
A Multivariate Behavior Genetic Investigation of Dual-Systems Models of Alcohol Involvement.双系统模型在酒精依赖中的多变量行为遗传学研究
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2018 Jul;79(4):617-626. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.617.
9
Impulsivity and Alcohol Involvement: Multiple, Distinct Constructs and Processes.冲动性与酒精摄入:多种不同的概念与过程
Curr Addict Rep. 2014 Mar;1(1):33-40. doi: 10.1007/s40429-013-0004-5. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
10
Changes in negative urgency, positive urgency, and sensation seeking across adolescence.整个青春期消极冲动、积极冲动和寻求刺激的变化。
Pers Individ Dif. 2016 Feb 1;90:332-337. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.024.

本文引用的文献

1
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.结构效度:客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach.结构模型评估与修正:一种区间估计方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4.
3
A Developmental Functional MRI Study of Prefrontal Activation during Performance of a Go-No-Go Task.一项关于执行 Go-No-Go 任务时前额叶激活的发展功能磁共振成像研究。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):835-47. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.6.835.
4
Understanding adolescence as a period of social-affective engagement and goal flexibility.理解青春期是一个社会情感参与和目标灵活性的时期。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Sep;13(9):636-50. doi: 10.1038/nrn3313.
5
Differential changes in impulsivity and sensation seeking and the escalation of substance use from adolescence to early adulthood.从青春期到成年早期,冲动和寻求刺激的差异变化与物质使用的升级。
Dev Psychopathol. 2013 Feb;25(1):223-39. doi: 10.1017/S0954579412000284. Epub 2012 Jul 24.
6
Arrested development? Reconsidering dual-systems models of brain function in adolescence and disorders.发展停滞?重新思考青少年大脑功能的双重系统模型及其障碍
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Jun;16(6):322-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.011. Epub 2012 May 20.
7
Adolescent impulsivity phenotypes characterized by distinct brain networks.青少年冲动特质的特征在于不同的大脑网络。
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Jun;15(6):920-5. doi: 10.1038/nn.3092.
8
Dopamine transporter polymorphisms affect social approach-avoidance tendencies.多巴胺转运体多态性影响社会趋近-回避倾向。
Genes Brain Behav. 2012 Aug;11(6):671-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2012.00791.x. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
9
Are executive function and impulsivity antipodes? A conceptual reconstruction with special reference to addiction.执行功能和冲动是对立面吗?特别参考成瘾的概念重构。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jun;221(3):361-87. doi: 10.1007/s00213-012-2689-x. Epub 2012 Mar 24.
10
Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications.前额叶皮层在成瘾中的功能障碍:神经影像学发现及临床意义。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011 Oct 20;12(11):652-69. doi: 10.1038/nrn3119.