Suppr超能文献

关于身体活动的个性化反馈对客观测量的身体活动变化的影响(FAB 研究):一项随机对照试验。

Impact of personalised feedback about physical activity on change in objectively measured physical activity (the FAB study): a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Sep 16;8(9):e75398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075398. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low levels of physical activity are a major public health concern, and interventions to promote physical activity have had limited success. Whether or not personalised feedback about physical activity following objective measurement motivates behaviour change has yet to be rigorously examined.

METHODS

And Findings: In a parallel group, open randomised controlled trial, 466 healthy adults aged 32 to 54 years were recruited from the ongoing population-based Fenland Study (Cambridgeshire, UK). Participants were randomised to receive either no feedback until the end of the trial (control group, n=120) or one of three different types of feedback: simple, visual, or contextualised (intervention groups, n=346). The primary outcome was physical activity (physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE) in kJ/kg/day and average body acceleration (ACC) in m/s(2)) measured objectively using a combined heart rate monitor and accelerometer (Actiheart(®)). The main secondary outcomes included self-reported physical activity, intention to increase physical activity, and awareness of physical activity (the agreement between self-rated and objectively measured physical activity). At 8 weeks, 391 (83.9%) participants had complete physical activity data. The intervention had no effect on objectively measured physical activity (PAEE: β=-0.92, 95% CI=-3.50 to 1.66, p=0.48 and ACC: β=0.01, 95% CI=-0.00 to 0.02, p=0.21), self-reported physical activity (β=-0.39, 95% CI=-1.59 to 0.81), or intention to increase physical activity (β=-0.05, 95% CI=-0.22 to 0.11). However, it was associated with an increase in awareness of physical activity (OR=1.74, 95% CI=1.05 to 2.89). Results did not differ according to the type of feedback.

CONCLUSIONS

Personalised feedback about physical activity following objective measurement increased awareness but did not result in changes in physical activity in the short term. Measurement and feedback may have a role in promoting behaviour change but are ineffective on their own.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN92551397 http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN92551397.

摘要

背景

低水平的身体活动是一个主要的公共卫生关注点,促进身体活动的干预措施收效甚微。客观测量后提供个性化的身体活动反馈是否能激发行为改变,这一点仍有待严格检验。

方法

在一项平行组、开放随机对照试验中,我们招募了来自正在进行的人群基础芬兰研究(英国剑桥郡)的 32 至 54 岁健康成年人 466 名。参与者被随机分配至仅在试验结束时接受反馈(对照组,n=120)或接受三种不同类型的反馈之一(干预组,n=346):简单反馈、视觉反馈或情境化反馈。主要结局是使用组合心率监测器和加速度计(Actiheart(®))客观测量的身体活动(身体活动能量消耗(PAEE)以 kJ/kg/天和平均身体加速度(ACC)以 m/s(2)表示)。主要次要结局包括自我报告的身体活动、增加身体活动的意愿和对身体活动的认识(自我评估和客观测量的身体活动之间的一致性)。8 周时,391 名(83.9%)参与者有完整的身体活动数据。该干预措施对客观测量的身体活动(PAEE:β=-0.92,95%CI=-3.50 至 1.66,p=0.48 和 ACC:β=0.01,95%CI=-0.00 至 0.02,p=0.21)、自我报告的身体活动(β=-0.39,95%CI=-1.59 至 0.81)或增加身体活动的意愿(β=-0.05,95%CI=-0.22 至 0.11)均没有影响。然而,它与对身体活动的认识增加有关(OR=1.74,95%CI=1.05 至 2.89)。结果不因反馈类型而异。

结论

客观测量后提供个性化的身体活动反馈增加了人们的意识,但在短期内并未导致身体活动的改变。测量和反馈可能在促进行为改变方面发挥作用,但单凭它们是无效的。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN92551397 http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN92551397。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8be/3774634/55ce65488b18/pone.0075398.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验