Suppr超能文献

ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的早期和晚期临床结局及其预测因素。

Early- and late-term clinical outcome and their predictors in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Konyang University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2013 Nov 15;169(4):254-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.08.132. Epub 2013 Sep 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUNDS

The disparity between ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) remains controversial. We compared clinical outcomes and prognostic factors between STEMI and NSTEMI using large-scale registry data.

METHODS

We recruited 28,421 patients with STEMI (n=16,607) and NSTEMI (n=11,814) between November 2005 and April 2010 from a nationwide registry in Korea. We performed landmark analysis of cardiac death, recurrent acute myocardial infarction (re-AMI), revascularization, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 30 days (early term) and 1 year (late term) after admission.

RESULTS

Patients with NSTEMI had a greater number of co-morbidities than STEMI patients. Early term MACE (6.9% vs. 4.5%, p<0.001) and cardiac death (6.1% vs. 3.7%, p<0.001) were higher in STEMI patients. However, late-term MACE (8.0% vs. 9.1%, p=0.007), cardiac death (1.9% vs. 2.6%, p=0.001), and re-AMI (0.6% vs. 1.3%, p<0.001) were lower in the STEMI group. The independent predictors of cardiac death were old age, renal dysfunction, LV dysfunction, Killip class, post-thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow, and major bleeding in both groups. Female gender, previous ischemic heart disease, diabetes, current smoking, multivessel disease, and body mass index were MI type- or time-dependent predictors.

CONCLUSION

The STEMI group displayed poor early term clinical outcome, whereas the NSTEMI group displayed poor late-term clinical outcome. The STEMI and NSTEMI groups had different predictor profiles for cardiac death, suggesting that different strategies are required for improving the late-term outcome of STEMI and NSTEMI patients.

摘要

背景

ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)之间的差异仍存在争议。我们使用大规模注册数据比较了 STEMI 和 NSTEMI 之间的临床结局和预后因素。

方法

我们招募了 2005 年 11 月至 2010 年 4 月期间来自韩国全国注册登记处的 28421 例 STEMI(n=16607)和 NSTEMI(n=11814)患者。我们对入院后 30 天(早期)和 1 年(晚期)的心脏死亡、复发性急性心肌梗死(再 AMI)、血运重建和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)进行了 landmark 分析。

结果

与 STEMI 患者相比,NSTEMI 患者有更多的合并症。STEMI 患者的早期 MACE(6.9% vs. 4.5%,p<0.001)和心脏死亡(6.1% vs. 3.7%,p<0.001)发生率更高。然而,晚期 MACE(8.0% vs. 9.1%,p=0.007)、心脏死亡(1.9% vs. 2.6%,p=0.001)和再 AMI(0.6% vs. 1.3%,p<0.001)发生率较低。两组的独立心脏死亡预测因素为年龄较大、肾功能不全、左心室功能障碍、Killip 分级、溶栓后心肌梗死(TIMI)血流和主要出血。女性、既往缺血性心脏病、糖尿病、当前吸烟、多血管疾病和体重指数是 MI 类型或时间依赖性预测因素。

结论

STEMI 组显示出较差的早期临床结局,而 NSTEMI 组显示出较差的晚期临床结局。STEMI 和 NSTEMI 组心脏死亡的预测因素不同,提示需要采取不同的策略来改善 STEMI 和 NSTEMI 患者的晚期预后。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验