Tangney June Price, Stuewig Jeffrey, Furukawa Emi, Kopelovich Sarah, Meyer Patrick, Cosby Brandon
George Mason University.
Crim Justice Behav. 2012 Oct;39(10):1340-1360. doi: 10.1177/0093854812451092.
Theory, research, and clinical reports suggest that moral cognitions play a role in initiating and sustaining criminal behavior. The 25 item Criminogenic Cognitions Scale (CCS) was designed to tap 5 dimensions: Notions of entitlement; Failure to Accept Responsibility; Short-Term Orientation; Insensitivity to Impact of Crime; and Negative Attitudes Toward Authority. Results from 552 jail inmates support the reliability, validity, and predictive utility of the measure. The CCS was linked to criminal justice system involvement, self-report measures of aggression, impulsivity, and lack of empathy. Additionally, the CCS was associated with violent criminal history, antisocial personality, and clinicians' ratings of risk for future violence and psychopathy (PCL:SV). Furthermore, criminogenic thinking upon incarceration predicted subsequent official reports of inmate misconduct during incarceration. CCS scores varied somewhat by gender and race. Research and applied uses of CCS are discussed.
理论、研究及临床报告表明,道德认知在引发和维持犯罪行为中发挥着作用。25项致罪认知量表(CCS)旨在衡量五个维度:权利观念;不愿承担责任;短期取向;对犯罪影响不敏感;以及对权威的消极态度。对552名监狱囚犯的研究结果支持了该量表的信度、效度及预测效用。CCS与卷入刑事司法系统、攻击行为、冲动性及缺乏同理心的自我报告测量相关。此外,CCS还与暴力犯罪史、反社会人格以及临床医生对未来暴力和精神病态风险(PCL:SV)的评分相关。此外,入狱时的致罪思维可预测囚犯在服刑期间随后的不当行为官方报告。CCS得分在性别和种族上略有差异。本文还讨论了CCS的研究及应用用途。