Molecular and Cell Biology, LGC, Teddington, United Kingdom ; Cardiff School of BioSciences, The Sir Martin Evans Building, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 20;8(9):e75296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075296. eCollection 2013.
Gene expression measurements detailing mRNA quantities are widely employed in molecular biology and are increasingly important in diagnostic fields. Reverse transcription (RT), necessary for generating complementary DNA, can be both inefficient and imprecise, but remains a quintessential RNA analysis tool using qPCR. This study developed a Transcriptomic Calibration Material and assessed the RT reaction using digital (d)PCR for RNA measurement. While many studies characterise dPCR capabilities for DNA quantification, less work has been performed investigating similar parameters using RT-dPCR for RNA analysis. RT-dPCR measurement using three, one-step RT-qPCR kits was evaluated using single and multiplex formats when measuring endogenous and synthetic RNAs. The best performing kit was compared to UV quantification and sensitivity and technical reproducibility investigated. Our results demonstrate assay and kit dependent RT-dPCR measurements differed significantly compared to UV quantification. Different values were reported by different kits for each target, despite evaluation of identical samples using the same instrument. RT-dPCR did not display the strong inter-assay agreement previously described when analysing DNA. This study demonstrates that, as with DNA measurement, RT-dPCR is capable of accurate quantification of low copy RNA targets, but the results are both kit and target dependent supporting the need for calibration controls.
基因表达测量详细描述了 mRNA 的数量,广泛应用于分子生物学领域,在诊断领域也越来越重要。反转录 (RT) 是生成互补 DNA 所必需的,它既低效又不精确,但仍然是使用 qPCR 进行 RNA 分析的基本工具。本研究开发了转录组校准材料,并使用数字 (d)PCR 评估了 RT 反应在 RNA 测量中的应用。虽然许多研究都对 dPCR 用于 DNA 定量的能力进行了描述,但使用 RT-dPCR 进行 RNA 分析的类似参数的研究较少。使用三种一步法 RT-qPCR 试剂盒以单重和多重格式评估了 RT-dPCR 对内源性和合成 RNA 的测量。将性能最佳的试剂盒与 UV 定量进行比较,并对灵敏度和技术重复性进行了研究。我们的结果表明,与 UV 定量相比,基于检测和试剂盒的 RT-dPCR 测量存在显著差异。尽管使用相同的仪器对相同的样本进行了评估,但不同的试剂盒针对每个靶标报告了不同的值。与分析 DNA 时描述的情况一样,RT-dPCR 并未显示出强烈的测定间一致性。本研究表明,与 DNA 测量一样,RT-dPCR 能够准确定量低拷贝 RNA 靶标,但结果取决于试剂盒和靶标,这支持了需要校准对照的观点。