Beasley Ian G, Laughton Deborah S, Coldrick Benjamin J, Drew Thomas E, Sallah Marium, Davies Leon N
Ophthalmic Research Group, Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK.
J Ophthalmol. 2013;2013:791084. doi: 10.1155/2013/791084. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
Purpose. To examine the influence of positional misalignments on intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement with a rebound tonometer. Methods. Using the iCare rebound tonometer, IOP readings were taken from the right eye of 36 healthy subjects at the central corneal apex (CC) and compared to IOP measures using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). Using a bespoke rig, iCare IOP readings were also taken 2 mm laterally from CC, both nasally and temporally, along with angular deviations of 5 and 10 degrees, both nasally and temporally to the visual axis. Results. Mean IOP ± SD, as measured by GAT, was 14.7 ± 2.5 mmHg versus iCare tonometer readings of 17.4 ± 3.6 mmHg at CC, representing an iCare IOP overestimation of 2.7 ± 2.8 mmHg (P < 0.001), which increased at higher average IOPs. IOP at CC using the iCare tonometer was not significantly different to values at lateral displacements. IOP was marginally underestimated with angular deviation of the probe but only reaching significance at 10 degrees nasally. Conclusions. As shown previously, the iCare tonometer overestimates IOP compared to GAT. However, IOP measurement in normal, healthy subjects using the iCare rebound tonometer appears insensitive to misalignments. An IOP underestimation of <1 mmHg with the probe deviated 10 degrees nasally reached statistical but not clinical significance levels.
目的。探讨位置偏移对回弹式眼压计测量眼压(IOP)的影响。方法。使用iCare回弹式眼压计,从36名健康受试者右眼的中央角膜顶点(CC)测量眼压读数,并与使用戈德曼压平眼压计(GAT)的眼压测量值进行比较。使用定制装置,还在CC鼻侧和颞侧旁开2毫米处测量iCare眼压读数,以及在鼻侧和颞侧相对于视轴5度和10度的角度偏差下测量。结果。GAT测量的平均眼压±标准差为14.7±2.5 mmHg,而CC处iCare眼压计读数为17.4±3.6 mmHg,表明iCare眼压高估2.7±2.8 mmHg(P<0.001),在平均眼压较高时增加。使用iCare眼压计在CC处的眼压与侧向位移处的值无显著差异。探头角度偏差时眼压略有低估,但仅在鼻侧10度时达到显著水平。结论。如前所示,与GAT相比,iCare眼压计高估眼压。然而,在正常健康受试者中使用iCare回弹式眼压计测量眼压似乎对偏移不敏感。探头鼻侧偏离10度时眼压低估<1 mmHg达到统计学但未达到临床显著水平。