Suppr超能文献

根据国际标准8612对青光眼患者进行的Icare眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较。

Comparison of ICare and IOPen Goldmann applanation tonometry according to international standards 8612 in glaucoma patients.

作者信息

Pahlitzsch Milena, Brünner Jeanette, Gonnermann Johannes, Maier Anna-Karina B, Torun Necip, Bertelmann Eckart, Klamann Matthias Kj

机构信息

Glaucoma and Retinal Degeneration Research Group, UCL, Institute of Ophthalmology, Bath Street, London, EC1V 9EL, United Kingdom.

Department of Ophthalmology, Campus Virchow Clinic, Charite University Medicine, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin13353, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov 18;9(11):1624-1628. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.11.14. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

AIM

To compare IOPen and ICare rebound tonometry to Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) according to International Standards Organization (ISO) 8612 criteria.

METHODS

Totally 191 eyes (=107 individuals) were included. Criteria of ISO 8612 were fulfilled: 3 clusters of IOP, measured by GAT, were formed. The GAT results were given as mean±standard deviation.

RESULTS

GAT (19.7±0.5 mm Hg) showed a significant correlation to ICare (19.8±0.5 mm Hg) (=0.547, <0.001) and IOPen (19.5±0.5 mm Hg) (=0.526, <0.001). According to ISO 8612 criteria in all 3 IOP groups the number of outliers (of the 95% limits of agreement) exceeded 5% for ICare and IOPen GAT: No.1 (=68) 29.4% and 22.1%, No.2 (=62) 35.5% and 37.1%, No.3 (=61) 26.2% and 42.6%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The strict requirements of the ISO 8612 are not fulfilled in a glaucoma collective by ICare and IOPen at present. As long as the Goldmann tonometry is applicable it should be used first of all for reproducible IOP readings. ICare and IOPen tonometry should be considered as an alternative tool, if application of Goldmann tonometry is not possible.

摘要

目的

根据国际标准化组织(ISO)8612标准,比较IOPen眼压计和ICare眼压回弹式眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)。

方法

共纳入191只眼(=107名个体)。符合ISO 8612标准:通过GAT测量形成3组眼压。GAT结果以平均值±标准差表示。

结果

GAT(19.7±0.5 mmHg)与ICare(19.8±0.5 mmHg)(=0.547,<0.001)和IOPen(19.5±0.5 mmHg)(=0.526,<0.001)显示出显著相关性。根据ISO 8612标准,在所有3组眼压中,ICare和IOPen的异常值数量(在95%一致性界限内)均超过5%:GAT:第1组(=68只眼)分别为29.4%和22.1%,第2组(=62只眼)分别为35.5%和37.1%,第3组(=61只眼)分别为26.2%和42.6%。

结论

目前,青光眼患者群体中ICare和IOPen眼压计未达到ISO 8612的严格要求。只要Goldmann眼压计适用,就应首先使用它来获取可重复的眼压读数。如果无法应用Goldmann眼压计,ICare和IOPen眼压计可作为替代工具。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

10
Critical pathway for primary open angle glaucoma diagnosis.原发性开角型青光眼诊断的关键路径
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 18;10(6):968-972. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.06.21. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
New technologies for measuring intraocular pressure.测量眼压的新技术。
Prog Brain Res. 2015;221:67-79. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验