a Department of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine , University of Florida College of Medicine , Gainesville , Florida , USA.
Account Res. 2014;21(1):34-49. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.822267.
Common practices for responsible conduct of research (RCR) instruction have recently been shown to have no positive impact on and possibly to undermine ethical decision-making (EDM). We show that a team-based learning (TBL) RCR curriculum results in some gains in decision ethicality, the use of more helpful metacognitive reasoning strategies in decision-making, and elimination of most negative effects of other forms of RCR instruction on social-behavioral responses. TBL supports the reasoning strategies and social mechanisms that underlie EDM and ethics instruction, and may provide a more effective method for RCR instruction than lectures and small group discussion.
最近的研究表明,常见的负责任研究行为(RCR)教学实践对道德决策(EDM)没有积极影响,甚至可能破坏道德决策。我们发现,基于团队的学习(TBL)RCR 课程在决策道德性方面取得了一些进展,在决策中使用了更多有益的元认知推理策略,并消除了其他形式的 RCR 教学对社会行为反应的大多数负面影响。TBL 支持 EDM 和伦理教学的推理策略和社会机制,并且可能为 RCR 教学提供比讲座和小组讨论更有效的方法。