• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

任务相关性和分心程度对刺激处理的影响。

The impact of task relevance and degree of distraction on stimulus processing.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Würzburg, Füchsleinstraβe 15, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Neurosci. 2013 Oct 1;14:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-107.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2202-14-107
PMID:24079268
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3851833/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of task relevance on event-related potential amplitudes of early visual processing was previously demonstrated. Study designs, however, differ greatly, not allowing simultaneous investigation of how both degree of distraction and task relevance influence processing variations. In our study, we combined different features of previous tasks. We used a modified 1-back task in which task relevant and task irrelevant stimuli were alternately presented. The task irrelevant stimuli could be from the same or from a different category as the task relevant stimuli, thereby producing high and low distracting task irrelevant stimuli. In addition, the paradigm comprised a passive viewing condition. Thus, our paradigm enabled us to compare the processing of task relevant stimuli, task irrelevant stimuli with differing degrees of distraction, and passively viewed stimuli. EEG data from twenty participants was collected and mean P100 and N170 amplitudes were analyzed. Furthermore, a potential connection of stimulus processing and symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was investigated.

RESULTS

Our results show a modulation of peak N170 amplitudes by task relevance. N170 amplitudes to task relevant stimuli were significantly higher than to high distracting task irrelevant or passively viewed stimuli. In addition, amplitudes to low distracting task irrelevant stimuli were significantly higher than to high distracting stimuli. N170 amplitudes to passively viewed stimuli were not significantly different from either kind of task irrelevant stimuli. Participants with more symptoms of hyperactivity and impulsivity showed decreased N170 amplitudes across all task conditions. On a behavioral level, lower N170 enhancement efficiency was significantly correlated with false alarm responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results point to a processing enhancement of task relevant stimuli. Unlike P100 amplitudes, N170 amplitudes were strongly influenced by enhancement and enhancement efficiency seemed to have direct behavioral consequences. These findings have potential implications for models of clinical disorders affecting selective attention, especially ADHD.

摘要

背景

先前已经证明了任务相关性对早期视觉处理事件相关电位幅度的影响。然而,研究设计差异很大,无法同时研究分心程度和任务相关性如何影响处理变化。在我们的研究中,我们结合了以前任务的不同特征。我们使用了一种修改后的 1 背任务,其中任务相关和任务不相关的刺激交替呈现。任务不相关的刺激可以与任务相关的刺激来自同一类别,也可以来自不同的类别,从而产生高和低分散注意力的任务不相关刺激。此外,该范式还包括被动观看条件。因此,我们的范式使我们能够比较任务相关刺激、具有不同分心程度的任务不相关刺激以及被动观看刺激的处理。从二十名参与者那里收集了 EEG 数据,并分析了平均 P100 和 N170 幅度。此外,还研究了刺激处理与注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)症状之间的潜在联系。

结果

我们的结果表明,任务相关性会调节峰值 N170 幅度。与高分散注意力的任务不相关或被动观看的刺激相比,任务相关刺激的 N170 幅度明显更高。此外,与高分散注意力的任务不相关刺激相比,低分散注意力的任务不相关刺激的幅度明显更高。被动观看的刺激的 N170 幅度与任何一种任务不相关刺激都没有显著差异。多动和冲动症状较多的参与者在所有任务条件下的 N170 幅度均降低。在行为水平上,较低的 N170 增强效率与错误警报反应显著相关。

结论

我们的结果表明,任务相关刺激的处理得到了增强。与 P100 幅度不同,N170 幅度受到增强的强烈影响,并且增强效率似乎具有直接的行为后果。这些发现对影响选择性注意的临床障碍模型,特别是 ADHD 具有潜在的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e8e/3851833/740196a8f338/1471-2202-14-107-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e8e/3851833/c6403788a1cf/1471-2202-14-107-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e8e/3851833/740196a8f338/1471-2202-14-107-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e8e/3851833/c6403788a1cf/1471-2202-14-107-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3e8e/3851833/740196a8f338/1471-2202-14-107-2.jpg

相似文献

1
The impact of task relevance and degree of distraction on stimulus processing.任务相关性和分心程度对刺激处理的影响。
BMC Neurosci. 2013 Oct 1;14:107. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-14-107.
2
Distraction by salient stimuli in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence for the role of task difficulty in bottom-up and top-down processing.注意缺陷多动障碍成人中显著刺激的分心:任务难度在自下而上和自上而下加工中的作用证据。
Cortex. 2018 Apr;101:206-220. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
3
Influence of education level on design-induced N170 and P300 components of event related potentials in the human brain.教育水平对人脑事件相关电位中设计诱发的N170和P300成分的影响。
J Integr Neurosci. 2014 Mar;13(1):71-88. doi: 10.1142/S0219635214500058. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
4
The role of aperiodic spectral slope in event-related potentials and cognition among children with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.周期性频谱斜率在注意缺陷多动障碍儿童与非注意缺陷多动障碍儿童事件相关电位和认知中的作用。
J Neurophysiol. 2022 Dec 1;128(6):1546-1554. doi: 10.1152/jn.00295.2022. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
5
Impaired processing of task-irrelevant salient information in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Evidence from event-related potentials.注意缺陷多动障碍成人对任务无关显著信息的加工受损:来自事件相关电位的证据。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2017 Jan;126(1):52-62. doi: 10.1037/abn0000221. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
6
The impact of prefrontal cortex for selective attention in a visual working memory task.前额叶皮质在视觉工作记忆任务中对选择性注意的影响。
Int J Neurosci. 2008 Dec;118(12):1673-88. doi: 10.1080/00207450601067356.
7
Acute aerobic exercise enhances attentional modulation of somatosensory event-related potentials during a tactile discrimination task.急性有氧运动可增强触觉辨别任务期间体感事件相关电位的注意力调节。
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Mar 15;281:267-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.12.045. Epub 2014 Dec 27.
8
Aging effects on selective attention-related electroencephalographic patterns during face encoding.老化对人脸编码过程中选择性注意相关脑电图模式的影响。
Neuroscience. 2010 Nov 24;171(1):173-86. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.08.051. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
9
Orchestrating Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms for Filtering Distracting Information: Brain-Behavior Relationships Revealed by a Mixed-Design fMRI Study.协调用于过滤干扰信息的主动和反应机制:一项混合设计功能磁共振成像研究揭示的脑-行为关系
J Neurosci. 2016 Jan 20;36(3):988-1000. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2966-15.2016.
10
Age-related loss in attention-based modulation of tactile stimuli at early stages of somatosensory processing.年龄相关的基于注意力的触觉刺激调制在躯体感觉加工早期的丧失。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1502-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.03.002. Epub 2012 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Identifying P100 and N170 as electrophysiological markers for conscious and unconscious processing of emotional facial expressions.将P100和N170识别为情绪面部表情有意识和无意识加工的电生理标志物。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2025 Jan 23;18:1464888. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1464888. eCollection 2024.
2
The Rejection Template of Working Memory Operates after Attention Capture.工作记忆的抑制模板在注意力捕获之后起作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Nov 8;12(11):436. doi: 10.3390/bs12110436.
3
Taking the chance!-Interindividual differences in rule-breaking.

本文引用的文献

1
Activation of the prefrontal cortex in a nonspatial working memory task with functional MRI.功能磁共振成像在非空间工作记忆任务中前额叶皮层的激活。
Hum Brain Mapp. 1994;1(4):293-304. doi: 10.1002/hbm.460010407.
2
Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential.空间选择性注意影响视觉诱发电位的早期外纹状区但不影响纹状区成分。
J Cogn Neurosci. 1996 Sep;8(5):387-402. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.5.387.
3
Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation.
铤而走险!——打破规则的个体差异。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 7;17(10):e0274837. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274837. eCollection 2022.
4
Overlaps and distinctions between attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder in young adulthood: Systematic review and guiding framework for EEG-imaging research.ADHD 与自闭症谱系障碍在青年期的重叠和区别:系统综述及 EEG 影像学研究的指导框架。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Jan;96:93-115. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
5
Increase or Decrease of fMRI Activity in Adult Attention Deficit/ Hyperactivity Disorder: Does It Depend on Task Difficulty?成人注意力缺陷多动障碍中功能磁共振成像活动的增加或减少:这取决于任务难度吗?
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016 May 6;19(10):pyw049. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyw049.
6
The Roles of Dopamine and Hypocretin in Reward: A Electroencephalographic Study.多巴胺和下丘脑泌素在奖赏中的作用:一项脑电图研究。
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0142432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142432. eCollection 2015.
7
Auditory conflict resolution correlates with medial-lateral frontal theta/alpha phase synchrony.听觉冲突解决与额部中-外侧θ/α相位同步相关。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 24;9(10):e110989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110989. eCollection 2014.
注意捕获在视觉搜索中受到目标可预测性的抑制:来自 N2pc、Pd 和地形分割的证据。
Psychophysiology. 2013 May;50(5):422-30. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12019. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
4
Standard errors and confidence intervals in within-subjects designs: generalizing Loftus and Masson (1994) and avoiding the biases of alternative accounts.在被试内设计中:推广 Loftus 和 Masson(1994)的研究并避免其他解释的偏见。标准误差和置信区间。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Jun;19(3):395-404. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0230-1.
5
Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.自上而下的调制:连接选择性注意和工作记忆。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Feb;16(2):129-35. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.014. Epub 2011 Dec 28.
6
Target resolution in visual search involves the direct suppression of distractors: evidence from electrophysiology.视觉搜索中的目标分辨率涉及对干扰物的直接抑制:来自电生理学的证据。
Psychophysiology. 2012 Apr;49(4):504-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01326.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
7
Control of working memory: effects of attention training on target recognition and distractor salience in an auditory selection task.工作记忆控制:注意训练对听觉选择任务中目标识别和分心物突显度的影响。
Brain Res. 2012 Jan 9;1430:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2011.10.036. Epub 2011 Oct 26.
8
Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.注意捕获由显著干扰物在视觉搜索期间由时间任务需求决定。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Mar;24(3):749-59. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00127. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
9
Cognitive control in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.成人注意缺陷多动障碍的认知控制。
Psychiatry Res. 2011 Aug 15;188(3):406-10. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.04.014. Epub 2011 May 6.
10
German validation of the Conners Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS) II: reliability, validity, diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.德国验证成人注意缺陷多动障碍评定量表(CAARS) II:信度、效度、诊断敏感性和特异性。
Eur Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;27(5):321-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.12.010. Epub 2011 Mar 9.