• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A pilot study of a chiropractic intervention for management of chronic myofascial temporomandibular disorder.一项关于脊椎按摩疗法干预慢性肌筋膜性颞下颌关节紊乱症管理的试点研究。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144(10):1154-63. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0034.
2
Internet-Based Multimodal Pain Program With Telephone Support for Adults With Chronic Temporomandibular Disorder Pain: Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.基于互联网的多模式疼痛项目并通过电话支持慢性颞下颌关节紊乱症疼痛的成年人:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 13;22(10):e22326. doi: 10.2196/22326.
3
Reported concepts for the treatment modalities and pain management of temporomandibular disorders.颞下颌关节紊乱病治疗方式与疼痛管理的报道概念。
J Headache Pain. 2015;16:106. doi: 10.1186/s10194-015-0586-5. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
4
Comparison of three different options for immediate treatment of painful temporomandibular disorders: a randomized, controlled pilot trial.三种不同的颞下颌关节紊乱疼痛即时治疗方案的比较:一项随机对照试验性研究
Acta Odontol Scand. 2016 Aug;74(6):480-6. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2016.1204558. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
5
Comparison of device-supported sensorimotor training and splint intervention for myofascial temporomandibular disorder pain patients.设备辅助的感觉运动训练与夹板干预对肌筋膜性颞下颌关节紊乱疼痛患者的比较。
J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Sep;45(9):669-676. doi: 10.1111/joor.12662. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
6
Intraoral myofascial therapy for chronic myogenous temporomandibular disorder: a randomized controlled trial.慢性肌源性颞下颌关节紊乱病的口内肌筋膜治疗:一项随机对照试验
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Jan;35(1):26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
7
3D printed versus milled stabilization splints for the management of bruxism and temporomandibular disorders: study protocol for a randomized prospective single-blinded crossover trial.3D 打印与铣削稳定夹板治疗磨牙症和颞下颌关节紊乱的比较:一项随机前瞻性单盲交叉试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Sep 5;25(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08437-7.
8
Changes in pain intensity and oral health-related quality of life in patients with temporomandibular disorders during stabilization splint therapy--a pilot study.稳定咬合板治疗期间颞下颌关节紊乱病患者疼痛强度及口腔健康相关生活质量的变化——一项初步研究
Acta Clin Croat. 2014 Mar;53(1):7-16.
9
Use and effectiveness of splint appliance therapy: review of literature.夹板矫治器疗法的应用与疗效:文献综述
Cranio. 1997 Apr;15(2):159-66. doi: 10.1080/08869634.1997.11746007.
10
The long-term effect of occlusal therapy on self-administered treatment outcomes of TMD.咬合治疗对颞下颌关节紊乱病自我管理治疗效果的长期影响。
J Orofac Pain. 1998 Winter;12(1):75-88.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Using Occlusal Splints Without Other Adjunctive Treatment Modules in the Management of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review of Literature.在颞下颌关节紊乱病管理中使用无其他辅助治疗模块的咬合板的评估:文献系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Aug 13;17(8):e89955. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89955. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Comparative effectiveness of traditional East Asian medicine treatments for temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.传统东亚医学治疗颞下颌关节紊乱症的比较效果:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Integr Med Res. 2025 Mar;14(1):101114. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2024.101114. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
3
Practitioner/Practice- and Patient-Based Factors Contributing to Dental Practitioner Treatment Recommendations for Patients with Pain-Related TMDs: Findings from the National Dental PBRN.影响牙科从业者为疼痛相关 TMD 患者提出治疗建议的从业者/实践和患者因素:来自国家牙科 PBRN 的发现。
J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2023 Nov 17;37(3):195-206. doi: 10.11607/ofph.3263.
4
Temporomandibular Disorder Treated With Chiropractic Therapy.采用整脊疗法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱症。
Cureus. 2023 Mar 19;15(3):e36377. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36377. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
The Efficacy of Manual Therapy Approaches on Pain, Maximum Mouth Opening and Disability in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.手法治疗对颞下颌关节紊乱症疼痛、最大开口度及功能障碍的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价
Life (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;13(2):292. doi: 10.3390/life13020292.
6
Oral splints for patients with temporomandibular disorders or bruxism: a systematic review and economic evaluation.口腔夹板治疗颞下颌关节紊乱或磨牙症患者的效果:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Feb;24(7):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta24070.
7
The treatment modalities of masticatory muscle pain a network meta-analysis.咀嚼肌疼痛的治疗方式:一项网状Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Nov;98(46):e17934. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017934.
8
Integrating Chiropractic Care Into the Treatment of Migraine Headaches in a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Case Series.在三级医疗医院中将整脊疗法纳入偏头痛治疗:病例系列
Glob Adv Health Med. 2019 Mar 28;8:2164956119835778. doi: 10.1177/2164956119835778. eCollection 2019.
9
Chiropractic Treatment of Temporomandibular Dysfunction: A Retrospective Case Series.颞下颌关节紊乱症的整脊治疗:一项回顾性病例系列研究
J Chiropr Med. 2015 Dec;14(4):279-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2015.08.005. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
10
Chiropractor interaction and treatment equivalence in a pilot randomized controlled trial: an observational analysis of clinical encounter video-recordings.一项试点随机对照试验中脊椎治疗师的互动与治疗等效性:临床诊疗视频记录的观察性分析
Chiropr Man Therap. 2014 Dec 3;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12998-014-0042-7. eCollection 2014.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness of traditional Chinese medicine and psychosocial care in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders-associated chronic facial pain.中药与心理社会干预治疗颞下颌关节紊乱相关慢性面部疼痛的疗效比较。
J Pain. 2012 Nov;13(11):1075-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
2
Evaluation of the short-term effectiveness of education versus an occlusal splint for the treatment of myofascial pain of the jaw muscles.评估教育与咬合夹板治疗咀嚼肌肌筋膜疼痛的短期疗效。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Jan;143(1):47-53. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0018.
3
Intraoral myofascial therapy for chronic myogenous temporomandibular disorder: a randomized controlled trial.慢性肌源性颞下颌关节紊乱病的口内肌筋膜治疗:一项随机对照试验
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 Jan;35(1):26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
4
Acupuncture in the treatment of pain in temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.针刺治疗颞下颌关节紊乱疼痛的系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin J Pain. 2010 Jul-Aug;26(6):541-50. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181e2697e.
5
Osteopathic manual therapy versus conventional conservative therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a randomized controlled trial.
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010 Apr;14(2):179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
6
Clinical effect of a topical herbal ointment on pain in temporomandibular disorders: a randomized placebo-controlled trial.一种局部草药软膏治疗颞下颌关节紊乱疼痛的临床效果:一项随机安慰剂对照试验。
J Altern Complement Med. 2009 Dec;15(12):1311-7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2009.0129.
7
Conservative care of temporomandibular joint disorder in a 35-year-old patient with spinal muscular atrophy type III: a case study.一名35岁III型脊髓性肌萎缩症患者颞下颌关节紊乱的保守治疗:病例报告
J Chiropr Med. 2009 Dec;8(4):187-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2009.07.005.
8
Muscle disorders and dentition-related aspects in temporomandibular disorders: controversies in the most commonly used treatment modalities.颞下颌关节紊乱病中的肌肉疾病及牙列相关问题:常用治疗方式中的争议
Int Arch Med. 2008 Oct 30;1(1):23. doi: 10.1186/1755-7682-1-23.
9
The efficacy of traditional, low-cost and nonsplint therapies for temporomandibular disorder: a randomized controlled trial.传统、低成本且非夹板疗法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱症的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Aug;137(8):1099-107; quiz 1169. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0348.
10
Chiropractic treatment of temporomandibular disorders using the activator adjusting instrument and protocol.使用激活器调整器械和方案对颞下颌关节紊乱症进行整脊治疗。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;11(6):70-3.

一项关于脊椎按摩疗法干预慢性肌筋膜性颞下颌关节紊乱症管理的试点研究。

A pilot study of a chiropractic intervention for management of chronic myofascial temporomandibular disorder.

作者信息

DeVocht James W, Goertz Christine M, Hondras Maria A, Long Cynthia R, Schaeffer Wally, Thomann Lauren, Spector Michael, Stanford Clark M

机构信息

Dr. DeVocht is an associate professor, Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, Palmer College of Chiropractic, Davenport, Iowa.

出版信息

J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144(10):1154-63. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0034.

DOI:10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0034
PMID:24080932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4103021/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Temporomandibular pain has multiple etiologies and a range of therapeutic options. In this pilot study, the authors assessed the feasibility of conducting a larger trial to evaluate chiropractic treatment of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs).

METHODS

The authors assigned 80 participants randomly into one of the following four groups, all of which included a comprehensive self-care program: reversible interocclusal splint therapy (RIST), Activator Method Chiropractic Technique (AMCT) (Activator Methods International, Phoenix), sham AMCT and self-care only. They made assessments at baseline and at month 2 and month 6, including use of the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders.

RESULTS

The authors screened 721 potential participants and enrolled 80 people; 52 participants completed the six-month assessment. The adjusted mean change in current pain over six months, as assessed on the 11-point numerical rating scale, was 2.0 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.1-3.0) for RIST, 1.7 (0.9-2.5) for self-care only, 1.5 (0.7-2.4) for AMCT and 1.6 (0.7-2.5) for sham AMCT. The authors also assessed bothersomeness and functionality.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found the study design and methodology to be manageable. They gained substantial knowledge to aid in conducting a larger study. AMCT, RIST and self-care should be evaluated in a future comparative effectiveness study.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

This pilot study was a necessary step to prepare for a larger study that will provide clinicians with information that should be helpful when discussing treatment options for patients with TMD.

摘要

背景

颞下颌疼痛有多种病因及一系列治疗选择。在这项初步研究中,作者评估了开展一项更大规模试验以评估整脊疗法治疗颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的可行性。

方法

作者将80名参与者随机分为以下四组之一,所有组均包括一个全面的自我护理计划:可逆性咬合板治疗(RIST)、激活器整脊技术(AMCT)(激活器方法国际公司,凤凰城)、假AMCT以及仅自我护理。他们在基线、第2个月和第6个月进行评估,包括使用颞下颌关节紊乱病研究诊断标准。

结果

作者筛查了721名潜在参与者,招募了80人;52名参与者完成了六个月的评估。在11点数字评分量表上评估,RIST组六个月内当前疼痛的调整后平均变化为2.0(95%置信区间,1.1 - 3.0),仅自我护理组为1.7(0.9 - 2.5),AMCT组为1.5(0.7 - 2.4),假AMCT组为1.6(0.7 - 2.5)。作者还评估了困扰程度和功能。

结论

作者发现该研究设计和方法是可管理的。他们获得了大量知识以帮助开展更大规模的研究。未来应在一项比较有效性研究中对AMCT、RIST和自我护理进行评估。

实际意义

这项初步研究是为一项更大规模研究做准备的必要步骤,该研究将为临床医生在讨论TMD患者的治疗选择时提供有用信息。