• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牛津肘关节评分丹麦语版本的验证。

Validation of the Danish version of the Oxford Elbow Score.

作者信息

Plaschke Hans Christian, Jørgensen Andreas, Thillemann Theis Muncholm, Brorson Stig, Olsen Bo Sanderhoff

机构信息

Skulder- og Albuesektionen, Ortopædkirurgisk Afdeling, Herlev Hospital, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.

出版信息

Dan Med J. 2013 Oct;60(10):A4714.

PMID:24083528
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Oxford Elbow Score (OES) is a patient-related outcome measure quantifying quality of life in relation to elbow disorders. This 12-item patient-administered English questionnaire comprises three domains: function, social-psychological status and pain. The purpose of this study was to examine the structure and reliability of the Danish version of the OES (D-OES).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 130 patients who had total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) surgery performed in the period from 1981 to 2008 completed the D-OES. The Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH) and the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) were also completed with a view to examining the convergent validity of the D-OES. In 45 cases, the questionnaire was completed twice to allow for calculation of test-retest reliability. The structure of the questionnaire was tested using Rasch analysis.

RESULTS

Overall internal consistency tested by Cronbach's alpha was 0.99. The test-retest reliability correlation coefficient was 0.99. Expressed in terms of Pearson's correlation coefficient, the convergent validity of the D-OES's functional, social-psychological and pain domain was 0.78, 0.80 and 0.81, respectively, for the MEPS and -0.66, -0.58 and -0.49, respectively, for the DASH. The 12 items of the D-OES fitted the Rasch model, and the multidimensionality of the OES was confirmed.

CONCLUSION

The Danish 12-item OES is a valid and reliable-patient administered questionnaire that can be used to quantify quality of life in patients with TEA.

摘要

引言

牛津肘关节评分(OES)是一种与患者相关的结局指标,用于量化与肘关节疾病相关的生活质量。这份由患者自行填写的包含12个条目的英文问卷包括三个领域:功能、社会心理状态和疼痛。本研究的目的是检验丹麦版OES(D - OES)的结构和信度。

材料与方法

共有130例在1981年至2008年期间接受全肘关节置换术(TEA)的患者完成了D - OES问卷。同时还完成了手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍评分(DASH)以及梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS),以检验D - OES的收敛效度。在45例患者中,问卷填写了两次以计算重测信度。使用拉施分析对问卷结构进行了测试。

结果

通过克朗巴哈α系数检验的总体内部一致性为0.99。重测信度相关系数为0.99。以皮尔逊相关系数表示,D - OES功能、社会心理和疼痛领域与MEPS的收敛效度分别为0.78、0.80和0.81,与DASH的收敛效度分别为 - 0.66、 - 0.58和 - 0.49。D - OES的12个条目符合拉施模型,证实了OES的多维性。

结论

丹麦版12项OES是一种有效且可靠的患者自行填写的问卷,可用于量化TEA患者的生活质量。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Danish version of the Oxford Elbow Score.牛津肘关节评分丹麦语版本的验证。
Dan Med J. 2013 Oct;60(10):A4714.
2
[Validation of the German version of the Oxford Elbow Score : A cross-sectional study].[牛津肘关节评分德语版的验证:一项横断面研究]
Orthopade. 2016 Aug;45(8):695-700. doi: 10.1007/s00132-016-3292-3.
3
The reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Dutch version of the Oxford elbow score.荷兰版牛津肘部评分的可靠性、有效性和反应性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2011 Jul 30;6:39. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-6-39.
4
The development and validation of a patient-reported questionnaire to assess outcomes of elbow surgery.一份用于评估肘部手术结果的患者报告问卷的开发与验证
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Apr;90(4):466-73. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.20290.
5
Cross-cultural validation of the Oxford Elbow Score and Mayo Elbow Performance Score in Greek.希腊文版牛津肘部评分和 Mayo 肘部功能评分的跨文化验证。
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2022 Feb;57:102499. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102499. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
6
Specificity and responsiveness of patient-reported and clinician-rated outcome measures in the context of elbow surgery, comparing patients with and without rheumatoid arthritis.在肘关节炎手术背景下,比较有和没有类风湿关节炎的患者,患者自评和临床医生评定结局测量的特异性和反应性。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Oct;98(6):652-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.05.011. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
7
Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Chinese version of the Oxford elbow score.中文版本的牛津肘部评分的跨文化适应性和有效性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Nov 26;15(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02100-y.
8
Validity and sensitivity to change of patient-reported pain and disability measures for elbow pathologies.患者报告的肘部病变疼痛和残疾测量的有效性和对变化的敏感性。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Apr;43(4):263-74. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4029. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
9
Validation of the cross-cultural adapted Italian version of the Oxford Elbow Score.牛津肘关节评分跨文化适应意大利语版本的验证
JSES Int. 2021 Feb 6;5(2):328-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.025. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation into German and evaluation of its psychometric properties.美国肩肘外科医师协会(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons)肘功能评分表:德文化调适版及其心理测量学特性评估。
J Hand Ther. 2010 Jul-Sep;23(3):301-13; quiz 314. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2010.03.001. Epub 2010 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity, reliability, responsiveness and interpretability of the EFAS-DK PROM: an observational cohort study of Danish speaking foot and ankle patients.EFAS-DK患者报告结局量表的效度、信度、反应度及可解释性:一项针对丹麦语足踝患者的观察性队列研究
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Jun 13;9(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00897-y.
2
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Analysis of the Indonesian Version of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS-INA).《梅奥肘关节功能评分印尼语版(MEPS-INA)的翻译、跨文化调适及心理测量学分析》
Cureus. 2025 Mar 5;17(3):e80106. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80106. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Clinical and radiographic outcome of tension band suture fixation for displaced olecranon fractures.
张力带缝线固定治疗移位性尺骨鹰嘴骨折的临床和影像学结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 21;25(1):658. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07788-1.
4
The Oxford Elbow Score demonstrated good measurement properties when used with a shortened 7-day recall period.牛津肘关节评分在采用缩短至7天的回忆期进行评估时,显示出良好的测量特性。
JSES Int. 2023 Jan 31;7(3):499-505. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.12.023. eCollection 2023 May.
5
Validation of the cross-cultural adapted Italian version of the Oxford Elbow Score.牛津肘关节评分跨文化适应意大利语版本的验证
JSES Int. 2021 Feb 6;5(2):328-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.10.025. eCollection 2021 Mar.
6
Elbow hemiarthroplasty versus open reduction and internal fixation for AO/OTA type 13 C2 and C3 fractures of distal humerus in patients aged 50 years or above: a randomized controlled trial.50 岁及以上患者的肱骨远端 AO/OTA 13 C2 和 C3 型骨折:肘半关节成形术与切开复位内固定的随机对照试验。
Trials. 2020 Jun 8;21(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04418-8.
7
Minimal important change and other measurement properties of the Oxford Elbow Score and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand in patients with a simple elbow dislocation; validation study alongside the multicenter FuncSiE trial.单纯肘关节脱位患者牛津肘关节评分和手臂、肩部和手部快速残疾评定量表的最小重要变化及其他测量属性;与多中心FuncSiE试验同步进行的验证研究
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0182557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182557. eCollection 2017.
8
Short-term results after arthroscopic resection of synovial plicae in the radiohumeral joint: a case series of 64 procedures.桡肱关节滑膜皱襞关节镜下切除术的短期疗效:64例手术病例系列
SICOT J. 2017;3:42. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2017021. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
9
Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index - the Danish version.西 Ontario 肩部骨关节炎指数丹麦语版本的 Rasch 分析。
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016 Nov 14;7:173-181. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S87048. eCollection 2016.
10
The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Oxford Elbow Score.牛津肘关节评分土耳其语版本的信度和效度。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2016 Sep 1;11(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0429-3.