Ståhl Christian, Edvardsson Stiwne Elinor
National Centre of Work and Rehabilitation, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden,
J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Sep;24(3):543-54. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9480-7.
The aim of this study was to analyze how different types of sick leave narratives were related to return to work (RTW), job mobility or continued sick leave for people sick-listed with common mental disorders. Special attention was paid to how the respondents described their contacts with employers and rehabilitation professionals.
Eight persons sick-listed with common mental disorders were interviewed at two occasions (2005-2006 and 2008-2009) about their self-perceptions, their sick leave, and their contacts with their employers and rehabilitation professionals, first during their first months as sick-listed, and a follow-up after approximately 4 years.
Two types of narratives were identified: restitutive (with focus on recovery and RTW), and contingent (focusing on managing the present). A common theme was that mental problems were not recognized and talked about in the same way as physical problems. This had consequences for peoples' acceptance of their diagnoses and for the RTW processes. In restitutive narratives, RTW was essential for returning to life as it was, where support from managers and colleagues facilitated a successful return. In contingent narratives, the experience of sick leave was part of a broader story of change where work relations were of less importance.
A narrative understanding of rehabilitation involves sensitivity toward the stories people are caught up in, and what role professionals may play in them. Promotion of job mobility may be difficult to accept for persons with restitutive narratives, while persons caught up in contingent narratives may be more open-and benefit more-from such solutions.
本研究旨在分析对于患有常见精神障碍而被列入病假名单的人,不同类型的病假经历叙述与重返工作岗位(RTW)、工作变动或持续病假之间的关系。特别关注受访者如何描述他们与雇主和康复专业人员的接触。
对八名患有常见精神障碍而被列入病假名单的人进行了两次访谈(2005 - 2006年和2008 - 2009年),内容涉及他们的自我认知、病假情况以及他们与雇主和康复专业人员的接触,第一次访谈是在他们被列入病假名单的头几个月,第二次访谈是在大约4年后的随访。
识别出两种类型的叙述:恢复性叙述(侧重于康复和重返工作岗位)和偶然性叙述(侧重于应对当下)。一个共同的主题是,精神问题没有像身体问题那样被认识和谈论。这对人们对其诊断的接受程度以及重返工作岗位的过程产生了影响。在恢复性叙述中,重返工作岗位对于回归原本的生活至关重要,经理和同事的支持有助于成功回归。在偶然性叙述中,病假经历是更广泛变化故事的一部分,其中工作关系的重要性较低。
对康复的叙述性理解涉及对人们所陷入的故事以及专业人员在其中可能扮演的角色保持敏感。对于有恢复性叙述的人来说,促进工作变动可能难以接受,而陷入偶然性叙述的人可能对这种解决方案更开放且受益更多。