Suppr超能文献

对口语和书面叙述的选择性和不变的神经反应。

Selective and invariant neural responses to spoken and written narratives.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 2;33(40):15978-88. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1580-13.2013.

Abstract

Linguistic content can be conveyed both in speech and in writing. But how similar is the neural processing when the same real-life information is presented in spoken and written form? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we recorded neural responses from human subjects who either listened to a 7 min spoken narrative or read a time-locked presentation of its transcript. Next, within each brain area, we directly compared the response time courses elicited by the written and spoken narrative. Early visual areas responded selectively to the written version, and early auditory areas to the spoken version of the narrative. In addition, many higher-order parietal and frontal areas demonstrated strong selectivity, responding far more reliably to either the spoken or written form of the narrative. By contrast, the response time courses along the superior temporal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus were remarkably similar for spoken and written narratives, indicating strong modality-invariance of linguistic processing in these circuits. These results suggest that our ability to extract the same information from spoken and written forms arises from a mixture of selective neural processes in early (perceptual) and high-order (control) areas, and modality-invariant responses in linguistic and extra-linguistic areas.

摘要

语言内容既可以通过口语表达,也可以通过书面形式传达。但是,当相同的真实信息以口语和书面形式呈现时,神经处理过程有多么相似呢?我们使用功能磁共振成像技术,记录了人类受试者的神经反应,这些受试者要么听了一段 7 分钟的口语叙述,要么阅读了与其时间锁定的文本。接下来,我们在每个大脑区域内,直接比较了书面和口语叙述引起的反应时间过程。早期视觉区域对书面版本有选择性反应,而早期听觉区域对叙述的口语版本有选择性反应。此外,许多高级顶叶和额叶区域表现出强烈的选择性,对叙述的口语或书面形式的反应更为可靠。相比之下,沿着颞上回和额下回的反应时间过程在口语和书面叙述中非常相似,这表明这些回路中的语言处理具有很强的模态不变性。这些结果表明,我们从口语和书面形式中提取相同信息的能力源于早期(感知)和高级(控制)区域中选择性神经过程的混合,以及语言和非语言区域中的模态不变响应。

相似文献

2
Speech comprehension aided by multiple modalities: behavioural and neural interactions.多模态辅助言语理解:行为和神经的相互作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Apr;50(5):762-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
4
A temporal bottleneck in the language comprehension network.语言理解网络中的时间瓶颈。
J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 27;32(26):9089-102. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5685-11.2012.
5
Convergence of spoken and written language processing in the superior temporal sulcus.颞上回中口语和书面语处理的融合。
Neuroimage. 2018 May 1;171:62-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.068. Epub 2017 Dec 23.
7
Shared premotor activity in spoken and written communication.口语和书面语交流中的共享运动前区活动。
Brain Lang. 2019 Dec;199:104694. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104694. Epub 2019 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Hierarchical surprise signals in naturalistic violation of expectations.自然主义违背预期中的分层意外信号。
Imaging Neurosci (Camb). 2025 Jan 24;3. doi: 10.1162/imag_a_00459. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Brain regions that represent amodal conceptual knowledge.代表非模态概念知识的大脑区域。
J Neurosci. 2013 Jun 19;33(25):10552-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0051-13.2013.
3
5
A temporal bottleneck in the language comprehension network.语言理解网络中的时间瓶颈。
J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 27;32(26):9089-102. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5685-11.2012.
6
Right temporal TMS impairs voice detection.右侧颞叶经颅磁刺激会损害语音检测。
Curr Biol. 2011 Oct 25;21(20):R838-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.08.046.
10
Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation.自然刺激过程中的皮质活动的可靠性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Jan;14(1):40-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.10.011. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验